[Home page](/) [Latest blog](../)

# British Localisation of Free Software

This section is part of [something like a blog](../). To contact me or comment
on this, [see my email page](/email.html).

![photo](/mjr2002.jpg)

* * *

## Links to related projects

I try to keep my [British localisation
projects](http://mjr.towers.org.uk/proj/britlang/) link page up-to-date, but I
lost a few minor links last time. More importantly, the only surviving Cornish
link now 404s - anyone know any replacements or additions?

[Multilingual blogging](blogmoves#multiling) is covered on another page.

* * *

## English Enforcement

Is English Enforcement in free software programming a growing problem? I was
surprised to see [ a call for all programs to be English-only
[cakebaker]](https://cakebaker.wordpress.com/2006/07/16/hey-programmer-why-
dont-you-code-in-english/) from a Swiss software developer. Half of the time,
supposedly-English-speaking programmers use nonsensical variable names, so who
cares if they mean something in another language? It may even help someone if
they know that language. Not all programmers are monoglots and English-
enforcement isn't healthy. I doubt speaking English will be a key factor in [
What Makes a Programmer?
[rabble]](http://www.anarchogeek.com/articles/2006/07/16/what-
makes-a-programmer) any time soon. Even many English-first-
language(1L)-speaking programmers don't use English properly, having grown up
in places like the USA or England since they stopped teaching language and
grammar at school. Many German-1L-speakers seem to speak USA English rather
than normal English too. What's a bit more language butchery between friends?

Code without translated documentation has many problems being maintained or
used anyway, whether the source documentation is English or some other
language. Also, I've seen API docs written by English-as-a-second-
language(2L)-speakers where they've misphrased something and it's ended up
just plain wrong. With a few exceptions, documentation is a translation from
code to prose and is best written by 1L-speakers in their first language, like
other translations. That's not always possible, I know.

The problem may not just be free software. Apparently, [ English should be the
only language needed for software patents
[BLOG@IP::JUR],](http://www.ipjur.com/2006/07/uk-cipa-favours-english-only-
language.php3) according to industry groups and some others. Patent-English is
barely comprehensible to a 1L-English speaker, so I think this makes EU
software patents even more unreasonable. The patenters push to give away ever
less information about their processes, arguing that being understandable
costs too much. In return for this violation of the spirit of patenting
(public knowledge in return for protection), we should refuse to give them
monopolies in new fields like software.

### transfuscate.wikipedia.org

Internationalisation can have unforseen problems. [ The Elephants Dream film
used an insult to label Catalan subtitles in the menu
[slashdot],](http://slashdot.org/articles/06/07/16/1345246.shtml) because the
only source they used was wikipedia and it had been vandalised. They should
have read [ The Wikipedia Hall of
Shame](http://chuck.mahost.org/weblog/index.php?cat=27) or [ Doh, the
humanity!](http://www.xcom2002.com/doh/index.php?s=06050514oth) Wikipedia is
notoriously unreliable. Why didn't they ask the translator, I wonder?

### Germash and Englitsch

[My language-jumping post in English about a German
advert](http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2006/08/msg00294.html) got the
entirely fair feedback of _"That's the worst Germanism I've ever seen giving
me the creeps!"_ as well as a pointer to [German influence in US
English](http://cioppino.blogs.com/hungrig_in_san_francisco/2006/06/englisch_oder_d.html).

* * *

## An Uneasy Multilingualism

In the past, I have suggested that it was a mistake to make a state-based
fsfe-uk mailing list instead of a language-based fsfe-en list. [The discussion
resulting from a call for Welsh and Irish
help](http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.org.fsf.uk/4462) is a pretty sad example
of some reasons why.

  * To top of this page
  * [To blog index](../)

[Comment form for non-frame browsers](../../comp/respond.pl).

Comments are moderated (damn spammers) but almost anything sensible gets
approved (albeit eventually). If you give a web address, I'll link it. I won't
publish your email address unless you ask me to, but I'll email you a link
when the comment is posted, or the reason why it's not posted.

* * *

This is copyright 2006 MJ Ray. See fuller notice on [front page](/).

