<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
         xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
         xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
         xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel rdf:about="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/index.rss">
		<title>MJR&#39;s slef-reflections</title>
		<description>Mostly news about cooperative work, free software projects, business, satellite TV and cycling around Weston-super-Mare.</description>
                <link>http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/</link>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
	
		<rdf:li resource="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/End_of_LugRadio_.html" />
	
		<rdf:li resource="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Firefox_3__day_10__security_flaw_2__more_banks__looking_for_a_new_browser.html" />
	
		<rdf:li resource="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Firefox_3__day_6__security_flaw_and_banks.html" />
	
		<rdf:li resource="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Firefox_3__day_3__first_impressions.html" />
	
		<rdf:li resource="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/7_Reasons_Why_Firefox_3_Download_Day_Sucks.html" />
	
		<rdf:li resource="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Forthcoming__and_past__Events_News__LUGoG__BikeWeek__HacktionLab__SPI.html" />
	
		<rdf:li resource="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Warning_for_Webmasters__Friday_13th_ahoy_.html" />
	
		<rdf:li resource="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/More_driving_and_cycling.html" />
	
		<rdf:li resource="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Online_shopping.html" />
	
		<rdf:li resource="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Fixing_things_the_wrong_way.html" />
	
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
        </channel>
	
	<item rdf:about="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/End_of_LugRadio_.html">
		<title>End of LugRadio!</title>
		<link>http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/End_of_LugRadio_.html</link>
		<description>
&lt;p&gt;
Just read on
&lt;a href=&quot;http://theangryangel.co.uk/index.php?/archives/262-Farewell-LUGRadio.html&quot;&gt;Farewell LUGRadio? [theangryangel]&lt;/a&gt;
and
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sungate.co.uk/?p=320&quot;&gt;Ashes to ashes, dust to dust... Lugradio is at an end [sungate]&lt;/a&gt;
that the most famous UK Free Software podcast
is ending at the end of this year.
I don&#39;t know the reasons yet, but it seems a
shame.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
I&#39;ve been listening again since they proved me
wrong and sorted out
the dumb licensing terms so it&#39;s clearly legal
to cut the shows up and only copy the bits that
interest me, and Season 5 seems more interesting
than previous ones.  Then again, I enjoyed
Red Dwarf VIII, so what do I know? (but VI and VII
did drag a lot)
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Maybe I will go to
&lt;a href=&quot;http://lugradio.org/live/UK2008/&quot;&gt;Lugradio Live 2008 in Wolverhampton on 19-20 July&lt;/a&gt;
now I know when it is! (Why
is the date only as a large slow graphic on the
event page? D&#39;oh! (Yeah I know I should have
emailed them, but I had
&lt;a href=&quot;http://mjr.towers.org.uk/blog/2007/#lr41645&quot;&gt;an unfun experience with the show&lt;a/&gt;,
so I&#39;d rather shout this in public.
Wow.  I guess I&#39;m still unhappy about them
regressing to school playground name-calling.))
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
There are some suggested alternatives on
theangryangel, but most are more
Ubuntu-centric (which wasn&#39;t a good thing about LR),
non-Ogg and/or non-European,
so it looks like I&#39;ll give
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.linuxoutlaws.com/&quot;&gt;LinuxOutlaws&lt;/a&gt;
a try.  Any other recommendations?
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p>
Just read on
<a href="http://theangryangel.co.uk/index.php?/archives/262-Farewell-LUGRadio.html">Farewell LUGRadio? [theangryangel]</a>
and
<a href="http://www.sungate.co.uk/?p=320">Ashes to ashes, dust to dust... Lugradio is at an end [sungate]</a>
that the most famous UK Free Software podcast
is ending at the end of this year.
I don't know the reasons yet, but it seems a
shame.
</p><p>
I've been listening again since they proved me
wrong and sorted out
the dumb licensing terms so it's clearly legal
to cut the shows up and only copy the bits that
interest me, and Season 5 seems more interesting
than previous ones.  Then again, I enjoyed
Red Dwarf VIII, so what do I know? (but VI and VII
did drag a lot)
</p><p>
Maybe I will go to
<a href="http://lugradio.org/live/UK2008/">Lugradio Live 2008 in Wolverhampton on 19-20 July</a>
now I know when it is! (Why
is the date only as a large slow graphic on the
event page? D'oh! (Yeah I know I should have
emailed them, but I had
<a href="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/blog/2007/#lr41645">an unfun experience with the show<a/>,
so I'd rather shout this in public.
Wow.  I guess I'm still unhappy about them
regressing to school playground name-calling.))
</p><p>
There are some suggested alternatives on
theangryangel, but most are more
Ubuntu-centric (which wasn't a good thing about LR),
non-Ogg and/or non-European,
so it looks like I'll give
<a href="http://www.linuxoutlaws.com/">LinuxOutlaws</a>
a try.  Any other recommendations?
</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:date>2008-07-03T12:57:21+00:00</dc:date>
  <dc:subject>software</dc:subject><dc:subject>web</dc:subject> 
	</item>
	
	<item rdf:about="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Firefox_3__day_10__security_flaw_2__more_banks__looking_for_a_new_browser.html">
		<title>Firefox 3, day 10: security flaw 2, more banks, looking for a new browser</title>
		<link>http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Firefox_3__day_10__security_flaw_2__more_banks__looking_for_a_new_browser.html</link>
		<description>
&lt;p&gt;
Well, I was hoping to get Yet Another Blog Reorg
done before posting this, but it just hasn&#39;t
happened, so here are a few more thoughts on
Firefox 3 on this ol&#39; blog.
In fact, I&#39;ll probably finish the FF3 series here
before I switch over.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
I was in central London on Tuesday and suffered both
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.drake.org.uk/2008/06/more-london-fun.html&quot;&gt;the rudeness&lt;/a&gt;
and
&lt;a href=&quot;http://she.geek.nz/archives/502-london-so-far.html&quot;&gt;the black snot&lt;/a&gt;
(which no-one else I know seems to suffer)
so maybe that&#39;s why I&#39;ve been underachieving
this week.  I&#39;ve had London lethargy.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
I had a report about online banking that doesn&#39;t
work with FF3.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.npbs.co.uk/&quot;&gt;NPBS&lt;/a&gt;
will move into the hall of shame, sadly.
I&#39;m almost certain I warned them months ago that
their online banking was doing Javascript
stunts that aren&#39;t going to work forever.
I emailed them and haven&#39;t heard back since.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Back to the browser:
I share the contempt for the 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.madism.org/index.php/2008/06/26/177-firefox3-and-ssl&quot;&gt;Firefox 3 and SSL&lt;/a&gt;
problems
and I
&lt;a href=&quot;http://upsilon.cc/~zack/blog/posts/2008/06/firefox_3_un-ranting/&quot;&gt;like the new URL bar too.&lt;/a&gt;
However, I am finding the FF3 seems to use more
CPU (and so power) than FF1.5 and there seems to
be some frustrating delays in FF-clipboard
communications,
so I&#39;m looking at other browsers.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://conkeror.org/&quot;&gt;Conkeror&lt;/a&gt;
looks interesting.  Still Gecko (useful for work)
but stripped down.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
I spotted another post about microformats,
which I mentioned in my last post,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://ejohn.org/blog/bbc-removing-microformat-support/&quot;&gt;about the BBC dropping support for microformats [John Resig]&lt;/a&gt;
and I also noticed
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.intertwingly.net/blog/2008/06/24/Minimalist-Markup&quot;&gt;just how good SVG and Minimalist Markup looks in FF3 [Sam Ruby]&lt;/a&gt;
- I&#39;d love to try it, but my IE-using clients
probably wouldn&#39;t understand and I hate making
single-browser special editions.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p>
Well, I was hoping to get Yet Another Blog Reorg
done before posting this, but it just hasn't
happened, so here are a few more thoughts on
Firefox 3 on this ol' blog.
In fact, I'll probably finish the FF3 series here
before I switch over.
</p><p>
I was in central London on Tuesday and suffered both
<a href="http://www.drake.org.uk/2008/06/more-london-fun.html">the rudeness</a>
and
<a href="http://she.geek.nz/archives/502-london-so-far.html">the black snot</a>
(which no-one else I know seems to suffer)
so maybe that's why I've been underachieving
this week.  I've had London lethargy.
</p><p>
I had a report about online banking that doesn't
work with FF3.
<a href="http://www.npbs.co.uk/">NPBS</a>
will move into the hall of shame, sadly.
I'm almost certain I warned them months ago that
their online banking was doing Javascript
stunts that aren't going to work forever.
I emailed them and haven't heard back since.
</p><p>
Back to the browser:
I share the contempt for the 
<a href="http://blog.madism.org/index.php/2008/06/26/177-firefox3-and-ssl">Firefox 3 and SSL</a>
problems
and I
<a href="http://upsilon.cc/~zack/blog/posts/2008/06/firefox_3_un-ranting/">like the new URL bar too.</a>
However, I am finding the FF3 seems to use more
CPU (and so power) than FF1.5 and there seems to
be some frustrating delays in FF-clipboard
communications,
so I'm looking at other browsers.
<a href="http://conkeror.org/">Conkeror</a>
looks interesting.  Still Gecko (useful for work)
but stripped down.
</p><p>
I spotted another post about microformats,
which I mentioned in my last post,
<a href="http://ejohn.org/blog/bbc-removing-microformat-support/">about the BBC dropping support for microformats [John Resig]</a>
and I also noticed
<a href="http://www.intertwingly.net/blog/2008/06/24/Minimalist-Markup">just how good SVG and Minimalist Markup looks in FF3 [Sam Ruby]</a>
- I'd love to try it, but my IE-using clients
probably wouldn't understand and I hate making
single-browser special editions.
</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:date>2008-06-27T20:45:44+00:00</dc:date>
  <dc:subject>banking</dc:subject><dc:subject>life</dc:subject><dc:subject>software</dc:subject><dc:subject>web</dc:subject> 
	</item>
	
	<item rdf:about="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Firefox_3__day_6__security_flaw_and_banks.html">
		<title>Firefox 3, day 6: security flaw and banks</title>
		<link>http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Firefox_3__day_6__security_flaw_and_banks.html</link>
		<description>
&lt;p&gt;
I didn&#39;t spot this when I wrote my last post,
but it seems there&#39;s a security alert for FF3
already - 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://hackademix.net/2008/06/19/firefox-3-untimely-security-advisory/&quot;&gt;hackademix.net: Firefox 3 Untimely Security Advisory&lt;/a&gt;
- but it also affects FF2 and probably my
cautious Javascript settings are enough to stop
it anyway, looking at that report.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
I&#39;ve also been sent another update to the page on
&lt;a href=&quot;http://mjr.towers.org.uk/blog/2007/banking#list&quot;&gt;Online Banking with GNU/Linux, Firefox-based browsers or Free Software&lt;/a&gt;
(first direct plus using ActiveX)
- I wonder if any bankers will be
noticeably slow to allow FF3 and will
any of them cite this security flaw?
I hope not - UK online banking security is
hardly in a good place to throw stones.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
I was mildly surprised that the list was linked from
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/bbcinternet/2008/06/linux_ubuntu_blog.html&quot;&gt;Ashley Highfield&#39;s BBC blog on Testing Linux Ubuntu&lt;/a&gt;
but I&#39;ve no idea why he doubts
the list&#39;s accuracy! It&#39;s as accurate as its
contributors - most of whom I name - and I&#39;m
willing to put my name to it too.
That&#39;s better than Wikipedia, which the BBC
uses far too much IMO.  Would he trust the list
more if it was anonymously-edited on a public
site?  Anyway, I guess I should
move that list to a more permanent location soon.
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Previous FF3 parts:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Firefox_3__day_3__first_impressions.html&quot;&gt;Firefox 3, day 3: first impressions&lt;/a&gt;
and &lt;a href=&quot;http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/7_Reasons_Why_Firefox_3_Download_Day_Sucks.html&quot;&gt;7 Reasons Why Firefox 3 Download Day Sucks&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p>
I didn't spot this when I wrote my last post,
but it seems there's a security alert for FF3
already - 
<a href="http://hackademix.net/2008/06/19/firefox-3-untimely-security-advisory/">hackademix.net: Firefox 3 Untimely Security Advisory</a>
- but it also affects FF2 and probably my
cautious Javascript settings are enough to stop
it anyway, looking at that report.
</p><p>
I've also been sent another update to the page on
<a href="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/blog/2007/banking#list">Online Banking with GNU/Linux, Firefox-based browsers or Free Software</a>
(first direct plus using ActiveX)
- I wonder if any bankers will be
noticeably slow to allow FF3 and will
any of them cite this security flaw?
I hope not - UK online banking security is
hardly in a good place to throw stones.
</p><p>
I was mildly surprised that the list was linked from
<a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/bbcinternet/2008/06/linux_ubuntu_blog.html">Ashley Highfield's BBC blog on Testing Linux Ubuntu</a>
but I've no idea why he doubts
the list's accuracy! It's as accurate as its
contributors - most of whom I name - and I'm
willing to put my name to it too.
That's better than Wikipedia, which the BBC
uses far too much IMO.  Would he trust the list
more if it was anonymously-edited on a public
site?  Anyway, I guess I should
move that list to a more permanent location soon.
</p>

<p>Previous FF3 parts:
<a href="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Firefox_3__day_3__first_impressions.html">Firefox 3, day 3: first impressions</a>
and <a href="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/7_Reasons_Why_Firefox_3_Download_Day_Sucks.html">7 Reasons Why Firefox 3 Download Day Sucks</a></p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:date>2008-06-23T11:23:01+00:00</dc:date>
  <dc:subject>banking</dc:subject><dc:subject>software</dc:subject><dc:subject>web</dc:subject> 
	</item>
	
	<item rdf:about="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Firefox_3__day_3__first_impressions.html">
		<title>Firefox 3, day 3: first impressions</title>
		<link>http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Firefox_3__day_3__first_impressions.html</link>
		<description>
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/7_Reasons_Why_Firefox_3_Download_Day_Sucks.html&quot;&gt;Previously&lt;/a&gt;, I wrote:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Seriously: the browser looks like
a big improvement from Firefox 2, but
there are so many niggles with
this download day idea...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In reply to
&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.liblime.com/open-sesame/archives/93&quot;&gt;Open Sesame » Did you download Firefox 3?&lt;/a&gt;,
I answer &quot;Yes&quot;.
It was a major upgrade for me, requiring new versions
of Cairo and GTK+2, and installation of DBus-GLib
on my &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gobolinux.org/&quot;&gt;GoboLinux&lt;/a&gt;
computer, which brought in new versions of Xorg and so
required a recompile of my
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gnustep.org/&quot;&gt;GNUstep&lt;/a&gt;
desktop applications.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Once that was done, Firefox compiled unattended.
As noted by Adam Sampson in the
&lt;a href=&quot;http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/7_Reasons_Why_Firefox_3_Download_Day_Sucks.html#c&quot;&gt;comments on my last post,&lt;/a&gt;
even after building from source, you still get all the
obnoxious click-through EULA and when you type about:config
into the address bar, you get a &quot;no user-servicable parts&quot;
sort of notice, which really sucks.
I notice that MozCorp don&#39;t call it &quot;100% Open Source&quot;,
preferring instead
&lt;a href=&quot;http://en-us.www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/organic/&quot;&gt;Firefox: 100% Organic Software&lt;/a&gt;
(because we need another marketing campaign for free software,
right?),
so I expect I need to winkle out
the restrictively-licensed parts again -
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gnu.org/software/gnuzilla/&quot;&gt;GNUzilla&lt;/a&gt;,
there&#39;s still demand for your good work!
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;After day 3 with Firefox 3, what do I think of it?
Well, it seems a lot faster and a lot less RAM-hungry,
and I&#39;m quite impressed that all of the fancier bits of
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.koha.org/&quot;&gt;Koha&lt;/a&gt; and
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wordpress.org/&quot;&gt;Wordpress&lt;/a&gt;
seem to be working nicely
but while I&#39;m not annoyed enough to switch browsers yet (unlike
&lt;a href=&quot;http://wooga.drbacchus.com/ff3-and-safari&quot;&gt;FF3 and Safari - DrBacchus&#39; Journal&lt;/a&gt;),
there are still a hell of a lot of niggles and interface bugs.
Some of the problems may have been introduced in Firefox 2,
but I didn&#39;t actually use that enough to notice.
My day-to-day browsing for the last year or so has been on
a customised Firefox 1.5.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
The FF3 user interface has some big steps backwards from
FF1.5: in
particular, I&#39;ve lost the &quot;force pages that try to open new windows into the same window&quot; option
(or whatever it was called... I can&#39;t find the FF1.5 manual
online anymore);
some keyboard shortcuts have changed - for no good reason
that I can see (JavaScript has switched from Alt-E n Alt-S to
Alt-E n Alt-J, for example);
what on earth is the history drop down doing next to the
&quot;Go Forward&quot; arrow?;
and
the button to close a tab is on each tab, so I need to be
careful to miss it when trying to switch to a tab and
my pointer makes a pointless detour to the top-right when
I want to close a tab.
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#39;s not all bad on the interface.  The new RSS feed
and bookmark links in the location bar are much better
than in previous versions.  The bookmark tagging and
auto-generated folders could be a great idea once I&#39;ve
used it for a while.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#39;m pretty annoyed that Firefox 3 seems to come with
some spyware enabled as default.  I usually have cookies
either switched off or set to &quot;ask me every time&quot; so I
was surprised to be offered a cookie from
safebrowsing.google.com!
I know it&#39;s for a noble goal, but what&#39;s this doing
enabled without asking first?  Untick
the &quot;tell me if the site I&#39;m visiting is ...&quot; options in
Edit: Preferences: Security if you don&#39;t want details
of your browsing to be sent to the USA.
Another thing which really annoys me is that the
&lt;a href=&quot;http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/&quot;&gt;Firefox support site&lt;/a&gt;
requires javascript and seems unhappy with my cookie settings.
Not cool.
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Other than that, the main problems with Firefox 3
are omissions rather than bugs.  For example,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2006/12/11/microformats-part-0-introduction/&quot;&gt;Microformats [Alex Faaborg]&lt;/a&gt;
support was one of the long-trumpeted new features in Firefox 3,
but they&#39;re really not obviously included, as noted by others
in posts like
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ampedwebstandards.com/2008/06/13/firefox-3-is-here-wheres-the-microformats-support/&quot;&gt;Firefox 3 is here - where&#39;s the microformats?&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And finally,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://en-us.www.mozilla.com/en-US/search/?query=firefox&amp;amp;hits_per_page=10&amp;amp;hits_per_site=0&quot;&gt;searching mozilla.com for firefox&lt;/a&gt; returns 0 hits, which is a bit strange...
are they ashamed of it?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p><a href="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/7_Reasons_Why_Firefox_3_Download_Day_Sucks.html">Previously</a>, I wrote:</p>
<blockquote><p>Seriously: the browser looks like
a big improvement from Firefox 2, but
there are so many niggles with
this download day idea...</p></blockquote>

<p>In reply to
<a href="http://blogs.liblime.com/open-sesame/archives/93">Open Sesame » Did you download Firefox 3?</a>,
I answer "Yes".
It was a major upgrade for me, requiring new versions
of Cairo and GTK+2, and installation of DBus-GLib
on my <a href="http://www.gobolinux.org/">GoboLinux</a>
computer, which brought in new versions of Xorg and so
required a recompile of my
<a href="http://www.gnustep.org/">GNUstep</a>
desktop applications.
</p>
<p>Once that was done, Firefox compiled unattended.
As noted by Adam Sampson in the
<a href="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/7_Reasons_Why_Firefox_3_Download_Day_Sucks.html#c">comments on my last post,</a>
even after building from source, you still get all the
obnoxious click-through EULA and when you type about:config
into the address bar, you get a "no user-servicable parts"
sort of notice, which really sucks.
I notice that MozCorp don't call it "100% Open Source",
preferring instead
<a href="http://en-us.www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/organic/">Firefox: 100% Organic Software</a>
(because we need another marketing campaign for free software,
right?),
so I expect I need to winkle out
the restrictively-licensed parts again -
<a href="http://www.gnu.org/software/gnuzilla/">GNUzilla</a>,
there's still demand for your good work!
</p>

<p>After day 3 with Firefox 3, what do I think of it?
Well, it seems a lot faster and a lot less RAM-hungry,
and I'm quite impressed that all of the fancier bits of
<a href="http://www.koha.org/">Koha</a> and
<a href="http://www.wordpress.org/">Wordpress</a>
seem to be working nicely
but while I'm not annoyed enough to switch browsers yet (unlike
<a href="http://wooga.drbacchus.com/ff3-and-safari">FF3 and Safari - DrBacchus' Journal</a>),
there are still a hell of a lot of niggles and interface bugs.
Some of the problems may have been introduced in Firefox 2,
but I didn't actually use that enough to notice.
My day-to-day browsing for the last year or so has been on
a customised Firefox 1.5.
</p><p>
The FF3 user interface has some big steps backwards from
FF1.5: in
particular, I've lost the "force pages that try to open new windows into the same window" option
(or whatever it was called... I can't find the FF1.5 manual
online anymore);
some keyboard shortcuts have changed - for no good reason
that I can see (JavaScript has switched from Alt-E n Alt-S to
Alt-E n Alt-J, for example);
what on earth is the history drop down doing next to the
"Go Forward" arrow?;
and
the button to close a tab is on each tab, so I need to be
careful to miss it when trying to switch to a tab and
my pointer makes a pointless detour to the top-right when
I want to close a tab.
</p>

<p>It's not all bad on the interface.  The new RSS feed
and bookmark links in the location bar are much better
than in previous versions.  The bookmark tagging and
auto-generated folders could be a great idea once I've
used it for a while.</p>

<p>I'm pretty annoyed that Firefox 3 seems to come with
some spyware enabled as default.  I usually have cookies
either switched off or set to "ask me every time" so I
was surprised to be offered a cookie from
safebrowsing.google.com!
I know it's for a noble goal, but what's this doing
enabled without asking first?  Untick
the "tell me if the site I'm visiting is ..." options in
Edit: Preferences: Security if you don't want details
of your browsing to be sent to the USA.
Another thing which really annoys me is that the
<a href="http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/">Firefox support site</a>
requires javascript and seems unhappy with my cookie settings.
Not cool.
</p>

<p>Other than that, the main problems with Firefox 3
are omissions rather than bugs.  For example,
<a href="http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2006/12/11/microformats-part-0-introduction/">Microformats [Alex Faaborg]</a>
support was one of the long-trumpeted new features in Firefox 3,
but they're really not obviously included, as noted by others
in posts like
<a href="http://www.ampedwebstandards.com/2008/06/13/firefox-3-is-here-wheres-the-microformats-support/">Firefox 3 is here - where's the microformats?</a>
</p>

<p>And finally,
<a href="http://en-us.www.mozilla.com/en-US/search/?query=firefox&amp;hits_per_page=10&amp;hits_per_site=0">searching mozilla.com for firefox</a> returns 0 hits, which is a bit strange...
are they ashamed of it?</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:date>2008-06-20T14:24:30+00:00</dc:date>
  <dc:subject>cooperatives</dc:subject><dc:subject>koha</dc:subject><dc:subject>software</dc:subject><dc:subject>spi</dc:subject><dc:subject>web</dc:subject> 
	</item>
	
	<item rdf:about="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/7_Reasons_Why_Firefox_3_Download_Day_Sucks.html">
		<title>7 Reasons Why Firefox 3 Download Day Sucks</title>
		<link>http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/7_Reasons_Why_Firefox_3_Download_Day_Sucks.html</link>
		<description>
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spreadfirefox.com/en-US/worldrecord&quot; &gt;&lt;img alt=&quot;Download Day 2008&quot; title=&quot;Download Day 2008&quot; src=&quot;http://www.spreadfirefox.com/sites/all/themes/spreadfirefox_RCS/images/download-day/buttons/en-US/180x150_02.png&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,91221-1319341,00.html&quot;&gt;It&#39;s&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7457503.stm&quot;&gt;every&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newsnow.co.uk/h/Breaking+News/Firefox+3.0+Launch&quot;&gt;where&lt;/a&gt;
on TV and in print, even
&lt;a href=&quot;http://raporto.info/node/4&quot;&gt;in Esperanto&lt;/a&gt;,
which
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all.html&quot;&gt;doesn&#39;t even have an official translation&lt;/a&gt;
- only
&lt;a href=&quot;http://tradukado.esperanto.org.uy/&quot;&gt;a third-party add-on Esperanto language pack&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;It was &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.web2learning.net/archives/1804&quot;&gt;late even for the US&lt;/a&gt;
and after most of Europe finished
work AFAIK.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;There&#39;s no official &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bittorrent.org/introduction.html&quot;&gt;bittorrent&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;There&#39;s no link to
&lt;a href=&quot;http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/3.0/source/&quot;&gt;the source code&lt;/a&gt;
from
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/?p=downloadday&quot;&gt;the main download page&lt;/a&gt;
as far as I can tell.
It may be mostly free software, but it feels
like MozCorp don&#39;t want pesky users
changing things.
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;It brings
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/wa-ffox3/?ca=dgr-lnxw04wa-ffox3&amp;amp;S_TACT=105AGX59&amp;amp;S_CMP=GRsitelnxw04&quot;&gt;more changes for webmasters&lt;/a&gt;
(which is another reason I code to standards whenever possible, but I bet some of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ttllp.co.uk/&quot;&gt;the free software web applications we use&lt;/a&gt; will need upgrades).&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;It might be the &lt;a href=&quot;http://np237.livejournal.com/18484.html&quot;&gt;&quot;most stupid world record ever&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
(or at least &lt;a href=&quot;http://glandium.org/blog/?p=198&quot;&gt;useless&lt;/a&gt;)
and comes just as some browsers move away
from the Gecko engine.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;...and all this irritation
came before I&#39;ve even built
and installed the damn thing!&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Seriously: the browser looks like
a big improvement from Firefox 2, but
there are so many niggles with
this download day idea...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p><a href="http://www.spreadfirefox.com/en-US/worldrecord" ><img alt="Download Day 2008" title="Download Day 2008" src="http://www.spreadfirefox.com/sites/all/themes/spreadfirefox_RCS/images/download-day/buttons/en-US/180x150_02.png" /></a></p>
<ol>
<li><a href="http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,91221-1319341,00.html">It's</a>
<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7457503.stm">every</a>
<a href="http://www.newsnow.co.uk/h/Breaking+News/Firefox+3.0+Launch">where</a>
on TV and in print, even
<a href="http://raporto.info/node/4">in Esperanto</a>,
which
<a href="http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all.html">doesn't even have an official translation</a>
- only
<a href="http://tradukado.esperanto.org.uy/">a third-party add-on Esperanto language pack</a>.
</li>
<li>It was <a href="http://www.web2learning.net/archives/1804">late even for the US</a>
and after most of Europe finished
work AFAIK.</li>
<li>There's no official <a href="http://www.bittorrent.org/introduction.html">bittorrent</a>.</li>
<li>There's no link to
<a href="http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/3.0/source/">the source code</a>
from
<a href="http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/?p=downloadday">the main download page</a>
as far as I can tell.
It may be mostly free software, but it feels
like MozCorp don't want pesky users
changing things.
</li>
<li>It brings
<a href="http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/wa-ffox3/?ca=dgr-lnxw04wa-ffox3&amp;S_TACT=105AGX59&amp;S_CMP=GRsitelnxw04">more changes for webmasters</a>
(which is another reason I code to standards whenever possible, but I bet some of <a href="http://www.ttllp.co.uk/">the free software web applications we use</a> will need upgrades).</li>
<li>It might be the <a href="http://np237.livejournal.com/18484.html">"most stupid world record ever"</a>
(or at least <a href="http://glandium.org/blog/?p=198">useless</a>)
and comes just as some browsers move away
from the Gecko engine.</li>
<li>...and all this irritation
came before I've even built
and installed the damn thing!</li>
</ol>
<p>Seriously: the browser looks like
a big improvement from Firefox 2, but
there are so many niggles with
this download day idea...</p> ]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:date>2008-06-18T14:06:57+00:00</dc:date>
  <dc:subject>cooperatives</dc:subject><dc:subject>software</dc:subject><dc:subject>spi</dc:subject><dc:subject>web</dc:subject> 
	</item>
	
	<item rdf:about="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Forthcoming__and_past__Events_News__LUGoG__BikeWeek__HacktionLab__SPI.html">
		<title>Forthcoming (and past) Events News: LUGoG, BikeWeek, HacktionLab, SPI</title>
		<link>http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Forthcoming__and_past__Events_News__LUGoG__BikeWeek__HacktionLab__SPI.html</link>
		<description>
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lugog.org.uk/&quot;&gt;LUG of Glastonbury&lt;/a&gt;
meets at
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.torleisure.com/&quot;&gt;Tor Leisure&lt;/a&gt;
in Glastonbury at 7pm tonight (Monday).
It will be a general planning meeting, maybe with some GPG-key-signing
and other tasks.  If you want the LUG to show you something in
particular, this will be a good event to attend.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
This week is
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bikeweek.org.uk/&quot;&gt;BikeWeek 2008&lt;/a&gt;
and there&#39;s
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bikeweek.org.uk/event_search.php?pagemode=display&amp;amp;event_id=548&quot;&gt;a free cyclists breakfast&lt;/a&gt;
at the Victorian Cafe on the Weston-super-Mare seafront about 8am Wednesday morning.
For events in other areas,
stick a partial postcode into
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bikeweek.org.uk/event_search.php&quot;&gt;the BikeWeek event search.&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.doonofmay.org/blog/?p=24&quot;&gt;Someone from The Doon Of May was at Hacktionlab 2008 @ Highbury Farm&lt;/a&gt;
this last weekend, as were
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bristolwireless.net/news/?p=393&quot;&gt;Bristol Wireless, who were running the wifi.&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
I&#39;ve not seen an official announcement, but
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spi-inc.org/corporate/meetings&quot;&gt;SPI&#39;s board meeting&lt;/a&gt;
will be on Wednesday at 8pm UK time (1900 UTC),
according to
&lt;a href=&quot;http://lists.spi-inc.org/pipermail/spi-general/2008-May/002574.html&quot;&gt;my last meeting report.&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
I&#39;ve heard through
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bristol.lug.org.uk/&quot;&gt;BBLUG&lt;/a&gt;
that the notorious Shevek is co-organising an event called &quot;An Adventure in Technology&quot;
at Trinity Community Arts in Bristol on 28 June 2008.
It&#39;s a
follow-up event to the 2003 Bristol Linux
and will be an all-inclusive event where everybody is encouraged to
bring something along, talk about it, swap ideas, and build things on
site. It doesn&#39;t have to be Linux-based, but a lot of things will be.
The event web site is
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techadventure.org/&quot;&gt;http://www.techadventure.org/&lt;/a&gt;
and you should post there if you have an idea or want to run a
session. There will also be a list for people who decide on the day
that they want to give a talk.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p>
<a href="http://www.lugog.org.uk/">LUG of Glastonbury</a>
meets at
<a href="http://www.torleisure.com/">Tor Leisure</a>
in Glastonbury at 7pm tonight (Monday).
It will be a general planning meeting, maybe with some GPG-key-signing
and other tasks.  If you want the LUG to show you something in
particular, this will be a good event to attend.
</p><p>
This week is
<a href="http://www.bikeweek.org.uk/">BikeWeek 2008</a>
and there's
<a href="http://www.bikeweek.org.uk/event_search.php?pagemode=display&amp;event_id=548">a free cyclists breakfast</a>
at the Victorian Cafe on the Weston-super-Mare seafront about 8am Wednesday morning.
For events in other areas,
stick a partial postcode into
<a href="http://www.bikeweek.org.uk/event_search.php">the BikeWeek event search.</a>
</p><p>
<a href="http://www.doonofmay.org/blog/?p=24">Someone from The Doon Of May was at Hacktionlab 2008 @ Highbury Farm</a>
this last weekend, as were
<a href="http://www.bristolwireless.net/news/?p=393">Bristol Wireless, who were running the wifi.</a>
</p><p>
I've not seen an official announcement, but
<a href="http://www.spi-inc.org/corporate/meetings">SPI's board meeting</a>
will be on Wednesday at 8pm UK time (1900 UTC),
according to
<a href="http://lists.spi-inc.org/pipermail/spi-general/2008-May/002574.html">my last meeting report.</a>
</p><p>
I've heard through
<a href="http://www.bristol.lug.org.uk/">BBLUG</a>
that the notorious Shevek is co-organising an event called "An Adventure in Technology"
at Trinity Community Arts in Bristol on 28 June 2008.
It's a
follow-up event to the 2003 Bristol Linux
and will be an all-inclusive event where everybody is encouraged to
bring something along, talk about it, swap ideas, and build things on
site. It doesn't have to be Linux-based, but a lot of things will be.
The event web site is
<a href="http://www.techadventure.org/">http://www.techadventure.org/</a>
and you should post there if you have an idea or want to run a
session. There will also be a list for people who decide on the day
that they want to give a talk.
</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:date>2008-06-16T15:05:41+00:00</dc:date>
  <dc:subject>cooperatives</dc:subject><dc:subject>life</dc:subject><dc:subject>spi</dc:subject><dc:subject>travel</dc:subject><dc:subject>web</dc:subject><dc:subject>wsm</dc:subject> 
	</item>
	
	<item rdf:about="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Warning_for_Webmasters__Friday_13th_ahoy_.html">
		<title>Warning for Webmasters: Friday 13th ahoy!</title>
		<link>http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Warning_for_Webmasters__Friday_13th_ahoy_.html</link>
		<description>
&lt;p&gt;
Personally, I like Friday 13th.
It&#39;s usually been
pretty good for me.  But for this one,
I won&#39;t be surprised if computer abusers
are planning some big attack tomorrow.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
I&#39;ve just spent a big chunk of my day
upgrading and securing some of the websites
that
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ttllp.co.uk/&quot;&gt;our free software cooperative&lt;/a&gt;
supports for a customer.
The number of attacks in the access logs is
surprising - and I&#39;ve been fixing other
people&#39;s cracked servers for over a decade.
It makes me wonder if someone is finding and
recruiting exploitable systems for tomorrow.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
If you have a website, please check that
any web applications on it are installed
correctly and the latest secure versions.
I&#39;ve been seeing
a lot of attack attempts for
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.joomla.org/&quot;&gt;Joomla&lt;/a&gt;
and
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wordpress.org/&quot;&gt;WordPress&lt;/a&gt;
in particular, even on sites which don&#39;t
run them.  That says something bad about
either the success rate of attacks for them,
or the stupidity of their attackers.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
In our case today, the damage seems to have
been minimal (touch wood!),
with the customer merely being
banned from some networks for a while.
It could be so much worse, like this
BBC News report about Cotton Traders
&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7446871.stm&quot;&gt;Card details stolen in web hack&lt;/a&gt;
(which is part of why I suggest small online
shops avoid storing credit card details on
their site - leave it to the payment gateway).
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Finally, there are some new scams like
&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7448187.stm&quot;&gt;Conmen abuse web address checks&lt;/a&gt;
on the horizon for online shops, so make
sure you&#39;ve got your 3D-Secure rules set
correctly by now and be cautious about
sending goods before you&#39;re sure you&#39;ve got
the money.  I think all web card payment
systems are a risk, so please
try to limit your risk.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Update:&lt;/strong&gt;
If you do get attacked, try to help track
the attackers down so we can get other results
like the
&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7451268.stm&quot;&gt;Jail sentence for botnet creator.&lt;/a&gt;
I wish our governments would concentrate on
toughening up blatent computer misuse law
and stop
&lt;a href=&quot;http://actonacta.org/?p=9&quot;&gt;tightening copyright law in secret.&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p>
Personally, I like Friday 13th.
It's usually been
pretty good for me.  But for this one,
I won't be surprised if computer abusers
are planning some big attack tomorrow.
</p><p>
I've just spent a big chunk of my day
upgrading and securing some of the websites
that
<a href="http://www.ttllp.co.uk/">our free software cooperative</a>
supports for a customer.
The number of attacks in the access logs is
surprising - and I've been fixing other
people's cracked servers for over a decade.
It makes me wonder if someone is finding and
recruiting exploitable systems for tomorrow.
</p><p>
If you have a website, please check that
any web applications on it are installed
correctly and the latest secure versions.
I've been seeing
a lot of attack attempts for
<a href="http://www.joomla.org/">Joomla</a>
and
<a href="http://www.wordpress.org/">WordPress</a>
in particular, even on sites which don't
run them.  That says something bad about
either the success rate of attacks for them,
or the stupidity of their attackers.
</p><p>
In our case today, the damage seems to have
been minimal (touch wood!),
with the customer merely being
banned from some networks for a while.
It could be so much worse, like this
BBC News report about Cotton Traders
<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7446871.stm">Card details stolen in web hack</a>
(which is part of why I suggest small online
shops avoid storing credit card details on
their site - leave it to the payment gateway).
</p><p>
Finally, there are some new scams like
<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7448187.stm">Conmen abuse web address checks</a>
on the horizon for online shops, so make
sure you've got your 3D-Secure rules set
correctly by now and be cautious about
sending goods before you're sure you've got
the money.  I think all web card payment
systems are a risk, so please
try to limit your risk.
</p><p>
<strong>Update:</strong>
If you do get attacked, try to help track
the attackers down so we can get other results
like the
<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7451268.stm">Jail sentence for botnet creator.</a>
I wish our governments would concentrate on
toughening up blatent computer misuse law
and stop
<a href="http://actonacta.org/?p=9">tightening copyright law in secret.</a>
</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:date>2008-06-12T16:18:11+00:00</dc:date>
  <dc:subject>cooperatives</dc:subject><dc:subject>life</dc:subject><dc:subject>software</dc:subject><dc:subject>web</dc:subject> 
	</item>
	
	<item rdf:about="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/More_driving_and_cycling.html">
		<title>More driving and cycling</title>
		<link>http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/More_driving_and_cycling.html</link>
		<description>
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://jbailey.livejournal.com/53415.html&quot;&gt;Jeff Bailey&lt;/a&gt;
asked:
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;Heya Brits! Any of you still driving cars at ~ 1.15 according to the Daily Mail&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Yes, I am.  I drove on Monday (at 1.18/l)
because
it was the least bad option for the journey.
I try to avoid it and I felt bad afterwards
(literally - it was too damn hot and
each part of the journey was too short for
the cab to cool down), but the car was
available and the other choices
involved not attending some events.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
On Sunday, I used my bike instead, but I was
I wondering if the world is full of Sunday drivers today or whether
I was really riding that badly. You name a junction on my route and I seemed
to get into a conflict with a car at it.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Today&#39;s bike trip went much better,
even getting thanks
from a coach for pulling aside halfway up
an incline, but I had to take avoiding action
 as I re-entered the
village because of a police car.
I&#39;m pretty damn sure that wasn&#39;t my
fault, but I do wonder when it&#39;s the police.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
I&#39;m still riding without a helmet, without
ill effects.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://gwolf.org/node/1829&quot;&gt;Gunnar Wolf was getting a breeze through a different kind of helmet&lt;/a&gt;
but I think it&#39;s telling that cyclists &quot;feel
naked&quot; rather than actually being naked
(usually, at least).  Have we got too used
to being cocooned in metal boxes while out
on the roads?  I&#39;ve always ridden and walked
a lot - is this why I don&#39;t miss the hat much?
I must remember to drink more in summer
without it, though.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
I share
&lt;a href=&quot;http://taz.net.au/blog/2008/05/31/sick-of-whinging-about-petrol/&quot;&gt;Criag Sanders&#39;s scepticism about the protests&lt;/a&gt;
and
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.perrier.eu.org/weblog/2008/05/28#planet-summary&quot;&gt;Chrisitan Perrier&#39;s enthusiasm for bike-pools.&lt;/a&gt;
I don&#39;t agree with many of
&lt;a href=&quot;http://etbe.coker.com.au/2008/06/09/record-oil-prices/&quot;&gt;Russel Coker&#39;s views on oil prices&lt;/a&gt;
but they are interesting reading, even so.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
I&#39;m taking part in
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jambustingjune.com&quot;&gt;JamBustingJune for the West of England region&lt;/a&gt;
and
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bikeweek.org.uk/&quot;&gt;BikeWeek 14-21 June 2008&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p>
<a href="http://jbailey.livejournal.com/53415.html">Jeff Bailey</a>
asked:
</p><blockquote><p>"Heya Brits! Any of you still driving cars at ~ 1.15 according to the Daily Mail"</p></blockquote><p>
Yes, I am.  I drove on Monday (at 1.18/l)
because
it was the least bad option for the journey.
I try to avoid it and I felt bad afterwards
(literally - it was too damn hot and
each part of the journey was too short for
the cab to cool down), but the car was
available and the other choices
involved not attending some events.
</p><p>
On Sunday, I used my bike instead, but I was
I wondering if the world is full of Sunday drivers today or whether
I was really riding that badly. You name a junction on my route and I seemed
to get into a conflict with a car at it.
</p><p>
Today's bike trip went much better,
even getting thanks
from a coach for pulling aside halfway up
an incline, but I had to take avoiding action
 as I re-entered the
village because of a police car.
I'm pretty damn sure that wasn't my
fault, but I do wonder when it's the police.
</p><p>
I'm still riding without a helmet, without
ill effects.
<a href="http://gwolf.org/node/1829">Gunnar Wolf was getting a breeze through a different kind of helmet</a>
but I think it's telling that cyclists "feel
naked" rather than actually being naked
(usually, at least).  Have we got too used
to being cocooned in metal boxes while out
on the roads?  I've always ridden and walked
a lot - is this why I don't miss the hat much?
I must remember to drink more in summer
without it, though.
</p><p>
I share
<a href="http://taz.net.au/blog/2008/05/31/sick-of-whinging-about-petrol/">Criag Sanders's scepticism about the protests</a>
and
<a href="http://www.perrier.eu.org/weblog/2008/05/28#planet-summary">Chrisitan Perrier's enthusiasm for bike-pools.</a>
I don't agree with many of
<a href="http://etbe.coker.com.au/2008/06/09/record-oil-prices/">Russel Coker's views on oil prices</a>
but they are interesting reading, even so.
</p><p>
I'm taking part in
<a href="http://www.jambustingjune.com">JamBustingJune for the West of England region</a>
and
<a href="http://www.bikeweek.org.uk/">BikeWeek 14-21 June 2008</a>
</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:date>2008-06-11T18:17:56+00:00</dc:date>
  <dc:subject>cycling</dc:subject><dc:subject>life</dc:subject><dc:subject>toll road</dc:subject><dc:subject>travel</dc:subject> 
	</item>
	
	<item rdf:about="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Online_shopping.html">
		<title>Online shopping</title>
		<link>http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Online_shopping.html</link>
		<description>
&lt;p&gt;
I maintain a number of web shops for
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ttllp.co.uk/&quot;&gt;our webmaster cooperative&lt;/a&gt;
and one of our main challenges is to
encourage people who put things into
their basket/cart to actually buy them.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.grahamjones.co.uk/2008/06/how-to-avoid-shopping-cart-abandonment.htm&quot;&gt;How to avoid shopping cart abandonment by Graham Jones&lt;/a&gt;
makes some points that I&#39;ve identified as
possible reasons for people not buying
in the past: comparisons,
robots and not trusting the site enough to
give payment details.
There&#39;s not much we can do about robots or
people comparison-shopping at a technical
level, but
we try to build some trust by publishing
the shop owner&#39;s geographic address and
telephone number (which I think is required
by law in England for most web shops now),
making sure the SSL certificate and domain
registration details are correct,
using reputable payment
providers and being clear about
delivery charges and terms.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
The point about the
slickness of the checkout process is a good
one and one that we&#39;ve only recently started
to work on.  We&#39;ve had pretty good
results from making the checkout slicker
on one site.  It looks like two-thirds of
people who click the checkout button now
continue to buy, putting it comfortably ahead of
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.coremetrics.co.uk/solutions/benchmarking.php&quot;&gt;current UK averages&lt;/a&gt;
but I need to tweak our stats calculator to
make the report directly comparable.
Nevertheless, I think those improvements
will be added to our other shops as soon as
possible.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
I share Graham&#39;s low opinion of the oft-quoted
Amazon.
We&#39;ve also been looking at other web shop
software besides
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oscommerce.com/&quot;&gt;OSCommerce&lt;/a&gt;
for a new project, so now would be
a good time to change to something new if
it improves the checkout a lot.
We&#39;ve made OSCommerce&#39;s checkout a lot
smoother, but it&#39;s still essentially OSC.
Is there a good checkout which you&#39;d want
to use as an example?
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
The other challenge is getting visitors onto
the site in the first place.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/how-to-build-links/&quot;&gt;How To Build Links By Patrick Altoft&lt;/a&gt;
explains the basics as well as I&#39;ve seen
recently.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p>
I maintain a number of web shops for
<a href="http://www.ttllp.co.uk/">our webmaster cooperative</a>
and one of our main challenges is to
encourage people who put things into
their basket/cart to actually buy them.
</p><p>
<a href="http://www.grahamjones.co.uk/2008/06/how-to-avoid-shopping-cart-abandonment.htm">How to avoid shopping cart abandonment by Graham Jones</a>
makes some points that I've identified as
possible reasons for people not buying
in the past: comparisons,
robots and not trusting the site enough to
give payment details.
There's not much we can do about robots or
people comparison-shopping at a technical
level, but
we try to build some trust by publishing
the shop owner's geographic address and
telephone number (which I think is required
by law in England for most web shops now),
making sure the SSL certificate and domain
registration details are correct,
using reputable payment
providers and being clear about
delivery charges and terms.
</p><p>
The point about the
slickness of the checkout process is a good
one and one that we've only recently started
to work on.  We've had pretty good
results from making the checkout slicker
on one site.  It looks like two-thirds of
people who click the checkout button now
continue to buy, putting it comfortably ahead of
<a href="http://www.coremetrics.co.uk/solutions/benchmarking.php">current UK averages</a>
but I need to tweak our stats calculator to
make the report directly comparable.
Nevertheless, I think those improvements
will be added to our other shops as soon as
possible.
</p><p>
I share Graham's low opinion of the oft-quoted
Amazon.
We've also been looking at other web shop
software besides
<a href="http://www.oscommerce.com/">OSCommerce</a>
for a new project, so now would be
a good time to change to something new if
it improves the checkout a lot.
We've made OSCommerce's checkout a lot
smoother, but it's still essentially OSC.
Is there a good checkout which you'd want
to use as an example?
</p><p>
The other challenge is getting visitors onto
the site in the first place.
<a href="http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/how-to-build-links/">How To Build Links By Patrick Altoft</a>
explains the basics as well as I've seen
recently.
</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:date>2008-06-10T11:48:38+00:00</dc:date>
  <dc:subject>cooperatives</dc:subject><dc:subject>software</dc:subject><dc:subject>statistics</dc:subject><dc:subject>web</dc:subject> 
	</item>
	
	<item rdf:about="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Fixing_things_the_wrong_way.html">
		<title>Fixing things the wrong way</title>
		<link>http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Fixing_things_the_wrong_way.html</link>
		<description>
&lt;p&gt;
For some reason (maybe related to upgrading
openssl recently), my Jabber client became
unstable.  Instead of fixing it the right
way, I simply upgraded to Emacs 22.2 (which
also got me the emacsclient --eval option
mentioned on this blog previously).
It still wouldn&#39;t make SSL connections at
first, but a quick application of
&lt;a href=&quot;http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=87od88hl58.fsf%40blackbird.nest.zamazal.org&quot;&gt;[jabber.el] Anybody using emacs-jabber with Emacs 22.2?&lt;/a&gt;
fixed it.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
That&#39;s the wrong way to fix that bug, but
it&#39;s not quite as wrong as
misusing computers
to try to fix copyright infringement.
MediaDefender denial-of-service attacked
a TV production company, as described in
&lt;a href=&quot;http://revision3.com/blog/2008/05/29/inside-the-attack-that-crippled-revision3&quot;&gt;Inside the Attack that Crippled Revision3 on May 29th, 2008 at 07:49 am by Jim Louderback in Polemics&lt;/a&gt;
MediaDefender or MediaDestroyer?
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
That&#39;s the wrong way to fix that bug, but
it&#39;s not quite as wrong as
making treaties mostly in secret, under NDAs
to try to evade local copyright law-makers.
The US government, the European Commission, Japan, Switzerland, Australia and a handful of other countries are meeting in a secret negotiation on a new treaty
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;that undermines civil rights and privacy, and which many say will change the substantive rights the public has to use copyrighted works or inventions.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Read more at 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://actonacta.org/&quot;&gt;Act On ACTA&lt;/a&gt;
and then contact your law-making
representatives.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p>
For some reason (maybe related to upgrading
openssl recently), my Jabber client became
unstable.  Instead of fixing it the right
way, I simply upgraded to Emacs 22.2 (which
also got me the emacsclient --eval option
mentioned on this blog previously).
It still wouldn't make SSL connections at
first, but a quick application of
<a href="http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=87od88hl58.fsf%40blackbird.nest.zamazal.org">[jabber.el] Anybody using emacs-jabber with Emacs 22.2?</a>
fixed it.
</p><p>
That's the wrong way to fix that bug, but
it's not quite as wrong as
misusing computers
to try to fix copyright infringement.
MediaDefender denial-of-service attacked
a TV production company, as described in
<a href="http://revision3.com/blog/2008/05/29/inside-the-attack-that-crippled-revision3">Inside the Attack that Crippled Revision3 on May 29th, 2008 at 07:49 am by Jim Louderback in Polemics</a>
MediaDefender or MediaDestroyer?
</p><p>
That's the wrong way to fix that bug, but
it's not quite as wrong as
making treaties mostly in secret, under NDAs
to try to evade local copyright law-makers.
The US government, the European Commission, Japan, Switzerland, Australia and a handful of other countries are meeting in a secret negotiation on a new treaty
</p><blockquote><p>"that undermines civil rights and privacy, and which many say will change the substantive rights the public has to use copyrighted works or inventions."</p></blockquote><p>
Read more at 
<a href="http://actonacta.org/">Act On ACTA</a>
and then contact your law-making
representatives.
</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:date>2008-06-09T13:14:56+00:00</dc:date>
  <dc:subject>life</dc:subject><dc:subject>software</dc:subject><dc:subject>web</dc:subject> 
	</item>
	
</rdf:RDF>
