<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
         xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
         xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
         xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel rdf:about="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/index.rss">
		<title>MJR&#39;s slef-reflections - Entries tagged banking</title>
		<description>Entries tagged banking</description>
                <link>http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/</link>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
	
		<rdf:li resource="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Firefox_3__day_6__security_flaw_and_banks.html" />
	
		<rdf:li resource="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Firefox_3__day_10__security_flaw_2__more_banks__looking_for_a_new_browser.html" />
	
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
        </channel>
	
	<item rdf:about="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Firefox_3__day_6__security_flaw_and_banks.html">
		<title>Firefox 3, day 6: security flaw and banks</title>
		<link>http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Firefox_3__day_6__security_flaw_and_banks.html</link>
		<description>
&lt;p&gt;
I didn&#39;t spot this when I wrote my last post,
but it seems there&#39;s a security alert for FF3
already - 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://hackademix.net/2008/06/19/firefox-3-untimely-security-advisory/&quot;&gt;hackademix.net: Firefox 3 Untimely Security Advisory&lt;/a&gt;
- but it also affects FF2 and probably my
cautious Javascript settings are enough to stop
it anyway, looking at that report.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
I&#39;ve also been sent another update to the page on
&lt;a href=&quot;http://mjr.towers.org.uk/blog/2007/banking#list&quot;&gt;Online Banking with GNU/Linux, Firefox-based browsers or Free Software&lt;/a&gt;
(first direct plus using ActiveX)
- I wonder if any bankers will be
noticeably slow to allow FF3 and will
any of them cite this security flaw?
I hope not - UK online banking security is
hardly in a good place to throw stones.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
I was mildly surprised that the list was linked from
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/bbcinternet/2008/06/linux_ubuntu_blog.html&quot;&gt;Ashley Highfield&#39;s BBC blog on Testing Linux Ubuntu&lt;/a&gt;
but I&#39;ve no idea why he doubts
the list&#39;s accuracy! It&#39;s as accurate as its
contributors - most of whom I name - and I&#39;m
willing to put my name to it too.
That&#39;s better than Wikipedia, which the BBC
uses far too much IMO.  Would he trust the list
more if it was anonymously-edited on a public
site?  Anyway, I guess I should
move that list to a more permanent location soon.
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Previous FF3 parts:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Firefox_3__day_3__first_impressions.html&quot;&gt;Firefox 3, day 3: first impressions&lt;/a&gt;
and &lt;a href=&quot;http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/7_Reasons_Why_Firefox_3_Download_Day_Sucks.html&quot;&gt;7 Reasons Why Firefox 3 Download Day Sucks&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p>
I didn't spot this when I wrote my last post,
but it seems there's a security alert for FF3
already - 
<a href="http://hackademix.net/2008/06/19/firefox-3-untimely-security-advisory/">hackademix.net: Firefox 3 Untimely Security Advisory</a>
- but it also affects FF2 and probably my
cautious Javascript settings are enough to stop
it anyway, looking at that report.
</p><p>
I've also been sent another update to the page on
<a href="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/blog/2007/banking#list">Online Banking with GNU/Linux, Firefox-based browsers or Free Software</a>
(first direct plus using ActiveX)
- I wonder if any bankers will be
noticeably slow to allow FF3 and will
any of them cite this security flaw?
I hope not - UK online banking security is
hardly in a good place to throw stones.
</p><p>
I was mildly surprised that the list was linked from
<a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/bbcinternet/2008/06/linux_ubuntu_blog.html">Ashley Highfield's BBC blog on Testing Linux Ubuntu</a>
but I've no idea why he doubts
the list's accuracy! It's as accurate as its
contributors - most of whom I name - and I'm
willing to put my name to it too.
That's better than Wikipedia, which the BBC
uses far too much IMO.  Would he trust the list
more if it was anonymously-edited on a public
site?  Anyway, I guess I should
move that list to a more permanent location soon.
</p>

<p>Previous FF3 parts:
<a href="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Firefox_3__day_3__first_impressions.html">Firefox 3, day 3: first impressions</a>
and <a href="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/7_Reasons_Why_Firefox_3_Download_Day_Sucks.html">7 Reasons Why Firefox 3 Download Day Sucks</a></p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:date>2008-06-23T11:23:01+00:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item rdf:about="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Firefox_3__day_10__security_flaw_2__more_banks__looking_for_a_new_browser.html">
		<title>Firefox 3, day 10: security flaw 2, more banks, looking for a new browser</title>
		<link>http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Firefox_3__day_10__security_flaw_2__more_banks__looking_for_a_new_browser.html</link>
		<description>
&lt;p&gt;
Well, I was hoping to get Yet Another Blog Reorg
done before posting this, but it just hasn&#39;t
happened, so here are a few more thoughts on
Firefox 3 on this ol&#39; blog.
In fact, I&#39;ll probably finish the FF3 series here
before I switch over.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
I was in central London on Tuesday and suffered both
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.drake.org.uk/2008/06/more-london-fun.html&quot;&gt;the rudeness&lt;/a&gt;
and
&lt;a href=&quot;http://she.geek.nz/archives/502-london-so-far.html&quot;&gt;the black snot&lt;/a&gt;
(which no-one else I know seems to suffer)
so maybe that&#39;s why I&#39;ve been underachieving
this week.  I&#39;ve had London lethargy.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
I had a report about online banking that doesn&#39;t
work with FF3.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.npbs.co.uk/&quot;&gt;NPBS&lt;/a&gt;
will move into the hall of shame, sadly.
I&#39;m almost certain I warned them months ago that
their online banking was doing Javascript
stunts that aren&#39;t going to work forever.
I emailed them and haven&#39;t heard back since.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Back to the browser:
I share the contempt for the 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.madism.org/index.php/2008/06/26/177-firefox3-and-ssl&quot;&gt;Firefox 3 and SSL&lt;/a&gt;
problems
and I
&lt;a href=&quot;http://upsilon.cc/~zack/blog/posts/2008/06/firefox_3_un-ranting/&quot;&gt;like the new URL bar too.&lt;/a&gt;
However, I am finding the FF3 seems to use more
CPU (and so power) than FF1.5 and there seems to
be some frustrating delays in FF-clipboard
communications,
so I&#39;m looking at other browsers.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://conkeror.org/&quot;&gt;Conkeror&lt;/a&gt;
looks interesting.  Still Gecko (useful for work)
but stripped down.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
I spotted another post about microformats,
which I mentioned in my last post,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://ejohn.org/blog/bbc-removing-microformat-support/&quot;&gt;about the BBC dropping support for microformats [John Resig]&lt;/a&gt;
and I also noticed
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.intertwingly.net/blog/2008/06/24/Minimalist-Markup&quot;&gt;just how good SVG and Minimalist Markup looks in FF3 [Sam Ruby]&lt;/a&gt;
- I&#39;d love to try it, but my IE-using clients
probably wouldn&#39;t understand and I hate making
single-browser special editions.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p>
Well, I was hoping to get Yet Another Blog Reorg
done before posting this, but it just hasn't
happened, so here are a few more thoughts on
Firefox 3 on this ol' blog.
In fact, I'll probably finish the FF3 series here
before I switch over.
</p><p>
I was in central London on Tuesday and suffered both
<a href="http://www.drake.org.uk/2008/06/more-london-fun.html">the rudeness</a>
and
<a href="http://she.geek.nz/archives/502-london-so-far.html">the black snot</a>
(which no-one else I know seems to suffer)
so maybe that's why I've been underachieving
this week.  I've had London lethargy.
</p><p>
I had a report about online banking that doesn't
work with FF3.
<a href="http://www.npbs.co.uk/">NPBS</a>
will move into the hall of shame, sadly.
I'm almost certain I warned them months ago that
their online banking was doing Javascript
stunts that aren't going to work forever.
I emailed them and haven't heard back since.
</p><p>
Back to the browser:
I share the contempt for the 
<a href="http://blog.madism.org/index.php/2008/06/26/177-firefox3-and-ssl">Firefox 3 and SSL</a>
problems
and I
<a href="http://upsilon.cc/~zack/blog/posts/2008/06/firefox_3_un-ranting/">like the new URL bar too.</a>
However, I am finding the FF3 seems to use more
CPU (and so power) than FF1.5 and there seems to
be some frustrating delays in FF-clipboard
communications,
so I'm looking at other browsers.
<a href="http://conkeror.org/">Conkeror</a>
looks interesting.  Still Gecko (useful for work)
but stripped down.
</p><p>
I spotted another post about microformats,
which I mentioned in my last post,
<a href="http://ejohn.org/blog/bbc-removing-microformat-support/">about the BBC dropping support for microformats [John Resig]</a>
and I also noticed
<a href="http://www.intertwingly.net/blog/2008/06/24/Minimalist-Markup">just how good SVG and Minimalist Markup looks in FF3 [Sam Ruby]</a>
- I'd love to try it, but my IE-using clients
probably wouldn't understand and I hate making
single-browser special editions.
</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:date>2008-06-27T20:45:44+00:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
</rdf:RDF>
