<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
         xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
         xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
         xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel rdf:about="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/index.rss">
		<title>MJR&#39;s slef-reflections - Entries tagged koha</title>
		<description>Entries tagged koha</description>
                <link>http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/</link>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
	
		<rdf:li resource="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Met_Calyx_about_Koha.html" />
	
		<rdf:li resource="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Bristol_and_Bath_Perl_Mongers.html" />
	
		<rdf:li resource="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Firefox_3__day_3__first_impressions.html" />
	
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
        </channel>
	
	<item rdf:about="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Met_Calyx_about_Koha.html">
		<title>Met Calyx about Koha</title>
		<link>http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Met_Calyx_about_Koha.html</link>
		<description>
&lt;p&gt;
I met Irma and Bob from
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.calyx.net.au/&quot;&gt;Calyx&lt;/a&gt;
yesterday.  They&#39;re fellow
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.koha.org/&quot;&gt;Koha&lt;/a&gt;
service providers from
Sydney, Australia 
who are over in Europe visiting various
people.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
It was nice to see them (first time
I&#39;ve met Bob) and have a bit of a
chat about where we&#39;re each going with Koha.
One interesting difference is that they have
several private-sector clients, while I
don&#39;t think
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ttllp.co.uk/&quot;&gt;my cooperative&lt;/a&gt;
has yet done a private-sector Koha,
but there seemed to be more similarities
than differences, including adding more
robust project management and ticketing
as we deliver Koha 3 to people.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
We went for lunch at
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bizwiki.co.uk/cafes/197634/the-cliffs-tea-rooms.htm&quot;&gt;The Cliffs Tea Rooms&lt;/a&gt;
at the other end of
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kewstoke.org/&quot;&gt;Kewstoke&lt;/a&gt;
Toll Road,
which has great views towards Wales,
but I forgot to take any pictures.  Ooops.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p>
I met Irma and Bob from
<a href="http://www.calyx.net.au/">Calyx</a>
yesterday.  They're fellow
<a href="http://www.koha.org/">Koha</a>
service providers from
Sydney, Australia 
who are over in Europe visiting various
people.
</p><p>
It was nice to see them (first time
I've met Bob) and have a bit of a
chat about where we're each going with Koha.
One interesting difference is that they have
several private-sector clients, while I
don't think
<a href="http://www.ttllp.co.uk/">my cooperative</a>
has yet done a private-sector Koha,
but there seemed to be more similarities
than differences, including adding more
robust project management and ticketing
as we deliver Koha 3 to people.
</p><p>
We went for lunch at
<a href="http://www.bizwiki.co.uk/cafes/197634/the-cliffs-tea-rooms.htm">The Cliffs Tea Rooms</a>
at the other end of
<a href="http://www.kewstoke.org/">Kewstoke</a>
Toll Road,
which has great views towards Wales,
but I forgot to take any pictures.  Ooops.
</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:date>2008-05-20T12:22:23+00:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item rdf:about="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Bristol_and_Bath_Perl_Mongers.html">
		<title>Bristol and Bath Perl Mongers</title>
		<link>http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Bristol_and_Bath_Perl_Mongers.html</link>
		<description>
&lt;p&gt;
The first meeting of the new
&lt;a href=&quot;http://perl.bristolbath.org/&quot;&gt;Bristol and Bath Perl M[ou]ngers&lt;/a&gt;
is tonight (Tue 27th) at 7pm,
according to
&lt;a href=&quot;http://mailman.bristolbath.org/pipermail/bristolbathpm/2008-May/000126.html&quot;&gt;this mailing list post.&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Despite their
&lt;a href=&quot;http://perl.bristolbath.org/rules.html&quot;&gt;rules,&lt;/a&gt;
I&#39;ve already been well-flamed by one member,
so it will be interesting to see what
sort of group it becomes.
Hopefully the flamers are nicer in real life.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p>
The first meeting of the new
<a href="http://perl.bristolbath.org/">Bristol and Bath Perl M[ou]ngers</a>
is tonight (Tue 27th) at 7pm,
according to
<a href="http://mailman.bristolbath.org/pipermail/bristolbathpm/2008-May/000126.html">this mailing list post.</a>
</p><p>
Despite their
<a href="http://perl.bristolbath.org/rules.html">rules,</a>
I've already been well-flamed by one member,
so it will be interesting to see what
sort of group it becomes.
Hopefully the flamers are nicer in real life.
</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:date>2008-05-27T08:55:01+00:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item rdf:about="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Firefox_3__day_3__first_impressions.html">
		<title>Firefox 3, day 3: first impressions</title>
		<link>http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Firefox_3__day_3__first_impressions.html</link>
		<description>
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/7_Reasons_Why_Firefox_3_Download_Day_Sucks.html&quot;&gt;Previously&lt;/a&gt;, I wrote:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Seriously: the browser looks like
a big improvement from Firefox 2, but
there are so many niggles with
this download day idea...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In reply to
&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.liblime.com/open-sesame/archives/93&quot;&gt;Open Sesame » Did you download Firefox 3?&lt;/a&gt;,
I answer &quot;Yes&quot;.
It was a major upgrade for me, requiring new versions
of Cairo and GTK+2, and installation of DBus-GLib
on my &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gobolinux.org/&quot;&gt;GoboLinux&lt;/a&gt;
computer, which brought in new versions of Xorg and so
required a recompile of my
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gnustep.org/&quot;&gt;GNUstep&lt;/a&gt;
desktop applications.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Once that was done, Firefox compiled unattended.
As noted by Adam Sampson in the
&lt;a href=&quot;http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/7_Reasons_Why_Firefox_3_Download_Day_Sucks.html#c&quot;&gt;comments on my last post,&lt;/a&gt;
even after building from source, you still get all the
obnoxious click-through EULA and when you type about:config
into the address bar, you get a &quot;no user-servicable parts&quot;
sort of notice, which really sucks.
I notice that MozCorp don&#39;t call it &quot;100% Open Source&quot;,
preferring instead
&lt;a href=&quot;http://en-us.www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/organic/&quot;&gt;Firefox: 100% Organic Software&lt;/a&gt;
(because we need another marketing campaign for free software,
right?),
so I expect I need to winkle out
the restrictively-licensed parts again -
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gnu.org/software/gnuzilla/&quot;&gt;GNUzilla&lt;/a&gt;,
there&#39;s still demand for your good work!
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;After day 3 with Firefox 3, what do I think of it?
Well, it seems a lot faster and a lot less RAM-hungry,
and I&#39;m quite impressed that all of the fancier bits of
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.koha.org/&quot;&gt;Koha&lt;/a&gt; and
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wordpress.org/&quot;&gt;Wordpress&lt;/a&gt;
seem to be working nicely
but while I&#39;m not annoyed enough to switch browsers yet (unlike
&lt;a href=&quot;http://wooga.drbacchus.com/ff3-and-safari&quot;&gt;FF3 and Safari - DrBacchus&#39; Journal&lt;/a&gt;),
there are still a hell of a lot of niggles and interface bugs.
Some of the problems may have been introduced in Firefox 2,
but I didn&#39;t actually use that enough to notice.
My day-to-day browsing for the last year or so has been on
a customised Firefox 1.5.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
The FF3 user interface has some big steps backwards from
FF1.5: in
particular, I&#39;ve lost the &quot;force pages that try to open new windows into the same window&quot; option
(or whatever it was called... I can&#39;t find the FF1.5 manual
online anymore);
some keyboard shortcuts have changed - for no good reason
that I can see (JavaScript has switched from Alt-E n Alt-S to
Alt-E n Alt-J, for example);
what on earth is the history drop down doing next to the
&quot;Go Forward&quot; arrow?;
and
the button to close a tab is on each tab, so I need to be
careful to miss it when trying to switch to a tab and
my pointer makes a pointless detour to the top-right when
I want to close a tab.
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#39;s not all bad on the interface.  The new RSS feed
and bookmark links in the location bar are much better
than in previous versions.  The bookmark tagging and
auto-generated folders could be a great idea once I&#39;ve
used it for a while.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#39;m pretty annoyed that Firefox 3 seems to come with
some spyware enabled as default.  I usually have cookies
either switched off or set to &quot;ask me every time&quot; so I
was surprised to be offered a cookie from
safebrowsing.google.com!
I know it&#39;s for a noble goal, but what&#39;s this doing
enabled without asking first?  Untick
the &quot;tell me if the site I&#39;m visiting is ...&quot; options in
Edit: Preferences: Security if you don&#39;t want details
of your browsing to be sent to the USA.
Another thing which really annoys me is that the
&lt;a href=&quot;http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/&quot;&gt;Firefox support site&lt;/a&gt;
requires javascript and seems unhappy with my cookie settings.
Not cool.
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Other than that, the main problems with Firefox 3
are omissions rather than bugs.  For example,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2006/12/11/microformats-part-0-introduction/&quot;&gt;Microformats [Alex Faaborg]&lt;/a&gt;
support was one of the long-trumpeted new features in Firefox 3,
but they&#39;re really not obviously included, as noted by others
in posts like
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ampedwebstandards.com/2008/06/13/firefox-3-is-here-wheres-the-microformats-support/&quot;&gt;Firefox 3 is here - where&#39;s the microformats?&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And finally,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://en-us.www.mozilla.com/en-US/search/?query=firefox&amp;amp;hits_per_page=10&amp;amp;hits_per_site=0&quot;&gt;searching mozilla.com for firefox&lt;/a&gt; returns 0 hits, which is a bit strange...
are they ashamed of it?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p><a href="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/7_Reasons_Why_Firefox_3_Download_Day_Sucks.html">Previously</a>, I wrote:</p>
<blockquote><p>Seriously: the browser looks like
a big improvement from Firefox 2, but
there are so many niggles with
this download day idea...</p></blockquote>

<p>In reply to
<a href="http://blogs.liblime.com/open-sesame/archives/93">Open Sesame » Did you download Firefox 3?</a>,
I answer "Yes".
It was a major upgrade for me, requiring new versions
of Cairo and GTK+2, and installation of DBus-GLib
on my <a href="http://www.gobolinux.org/">GoboLinux</a>
computer, which brought in new versions of Xorg and so
required a recompile of my
<a href="http://www.gnustep.org/">GNUstep</a>
desktop applications.
</p>
<p>Once that was done, Firefox compiled unattended.
As noted by Adam Sampson in the
<a href="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/7_Reasons_Why_Firefox_3_Download_Day_Sucks.html#c">comments on my last post,</a>
even after building from source, you still get all the
obnoxious click-through EULA and when you type about:config
into the address bar, you get a "no user-servicable parts"
sort of notice, which really sucks.
I notice that MozCorp don't call it "100% Open Source",
preferring instead
<a href="http://en-us.www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/organic/">Firefox: 100% Organic Software</a>
(because we need another marketing campaign for free software,
right?),
so I expect I need to winkle out
the restrictively-licensed parts again -
<a href="http://www.gnu.org/software/gnuzilla/">GNUzilla</a>,
there's still demand for your good work!
</p>

<p>After day 3 with Firefox 3, what do I think of it?
Well, it seems a lot faster and a lot less RAM-hungry,
and I'm quite impressed that all of the fancier bits of
<a href="http://www.koha.org/">Koha</a> and
<a href="http://www.wordpress.org/">Wordpress</a>
seem to be working nicely
but while I'm not annoyed enough to switch browsers yet (unlike
<a href="http://wooga.drbacchus.com/ff3-and-safari">FF3 and Safari - DrBacchus' Journal</a>),
there are still a hell of a lot of niggles and interface bugs.
Some of the problems may have been introduced in Firefox 2,
but I didn't actually use that enough to notice.
My day-to-day browsing for the last year or so has been on
a customised Firefox 1.5.
</p><p>
The FF3 user interface has some big steps backwards from
FF1.5: in
particular, I've lost the "force pages that try to open new windows into the same window" option
(or whatever it was called... I can't find the FF1.5 manual
online anymore);
some keyboard shortcuts have changed - for no good reason
that I can see (JavaScript has switched from Alt-E n Alt-S to
Alt-E n Alt-J, for example);
what on earth is the history drop down doing next to the
"Go Forward" arrow?;
and
the button to close a tab is on each tab, so I need to be
careful to miss it when trying to switch to a tab and
my pointer makes a pointless detour to the top-right when
I want to close a tab.
</p>

<p>It's not all bad on the interface.  The new RSS feed
and bookmark links in the location bar are much better
than in previous versions.  The bookmark tagging and
auto-generated folders could be a great idea once I've
used it for a while.</p>

<p>I'm pretty annoyed that Firefox 3 seems to come with
some spyware enabled as default.  I usually have cookies
either switched off or set to "ask me every time" so I
was surprised to be offered a cookie from
safebrowsing.google.com!
I know it's for a noble goal, but what's this doing
enabled without asking first?  Untick
the "tell me if the site I'm visiting is ..." options in
Edit: Preferences: Security if you don't want details
of your browsing to be sent to the USA.
Another thing which really annoys me is that the
<a href="http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/">Firefox support site</a>
requires javascript and seems unhappy with my cookie settings.
Not cool.
</p>

<p>Other than that, the main problems with Firefox 3
are omissions rather than bugs.  For example,
<a href="http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2006/12/11/microformats-part-0-introduction/">Microformats [Alex Faaborg]</a>
support was one of the long-trumpeted new features in Firefox 3,
but they're really not obviously included, as noted by others
in posts like
<a href="http://www.ampedwebstandards.com/2008/06/13/firefox-3-is-here-wheres-the-microformats-support/">Firefox 3 is here - where's the microformats?</a>
</p>

<p>And finally,
<a href="http://en-us.www.mozilla.com/en-US/search/?query=firefox&amp;hits_per_page=10&amp;hits_per_site=0">searching mozilla.com for firefox</a> returns 0 hits, which is a bit strange...
are they ashamed of it?</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:date>2008-06-20T14:24:30+00:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
</rdf:RDF>
