<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
         xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
         xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
         xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel rdf:about="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/index.rss">
		<title>MJR&#39;s slef-reflections - Entries tagged satellite</title>
		<description>Entries tagged satellite</description>
                <link>http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/</link>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
	
		<rdf:li resource="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/BBC_TV__Click__Free_beer_and_facebook_flaming.html" />
	
		<rdf:li resource="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Sky_Data_Protection.html" />
	
		<rdf:li resource="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/BBC_website__TV_and_Technology.html" />
	
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
        </channel>
	
	<item rdf:about="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/BBC_TV__Click__Free_beer_and_facebook_flaming.html">
		<title>BBC TV: Click: Free=beer and facebook-flaming</title>
		<link>http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/BBC_TV__Click__Free_beer_and_facebook_flaming.html</link>
		<description>
&lt;p&gt;
Free software finally gets significant coverage on BBC TV&#39;s Click show
this week, but I think it&#39;s very much Linux rather than GNU/Linux and
free cost rather than freedom.  They mentioned free security software
and even raised the possibility of trojans, but didn&#39;t mention how
free (as in freedom) software allows any random end-user to check or
have it checked.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Quite a missed opportunity!  However, Click has a regular letters
section, so watch it (times below), email click@bbc.co.uk
and see if we can get the free software view across.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
The letters section this week seemed to be flaming proprietary SaaS
social network site facebook for their pathetic default-permit
approach to security of user details.  I really think there&#39;s a role
for something like
&lt;a href=&quot;http://noserub.com&quot;&gt;noserub&lt;/a&gt;
in free software social networking.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/click&quot;&gt;Click-UK&lt;/a&gt;
 is shown on BBC News Channel Saturday 1130, Sunday
0430 and 1130, Monday 0030 and Sunday 0430 on BBC-1 (times BST)
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbcworld.com/click&quot;&gt;Click-World&lt;/a&gt;
is shown Thursday 19:30 GMT, Repeated Friday 09:30
and 12:30 (Asia Pacific only), Saturdays 06:30, Mondays 15:30,
Tuesdays 01:30 (not Asia Pacific, Middle East or South Asia) and 07:30 GMT
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Anyone else see this?
&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p>
Free software finally gets significant coverage on BBC TV's Click show
this week, but I think it's very much Linux rather than GNU/Linux and
free cost rather than freedom.  They mentioned free security software
and even raised the possibility of trojans, but didn't mention how
free (as in freedom) software allows any random end-user to check or
have it checked.
</p><p>
Quite a missed opportunity!  However, Click has a regular letters
section, so watch it (times below), email click@bbc.co.uk
and see if we can get the free software view across.
</p><p>
The letters section this week seemed to be flaming proprietary SaaS
social network site facebook for their pathetic default-permit
approach to security of user details.  I really think there's a role
for something like
<a href="http://noserub.com">noserub</a>
in free software social networking.
</p><p>
<a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/click">Click-UK</a>
 is shown on BBC News Channel Saturday 1130, Sunday
0430 and 1130, Monday 0030 and Sunday 0430 on BBC-1 (times BST)
</p><p>
<a href="http://www.bbcworld.com/click">Click-World</a>
is shown Thursday 19:30 GMT, Repeated Friday 09:30
and 12:30 (Asia Pacific only), Saturdays 06:30, Mondays 15:30,
Tuesdays 01:30 (not Asia Pacific, Middle East or South Asia) and 07:30 GMT
</p><p>
Anyone else see this?
</p>

 ]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:date>2008-05-16T17:15:36+00:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item rdf:about="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Sky_Data_Protection.html">
		<title>Sky Data Protection</title>
		<link>http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Sky_Data_Protection.html</link>
		<description>
&lt;p&gt;
For the first time in a while,
I&#39;ve filed a
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ico.gov.uk/complaints/data_protection.aspx&quot;&gt;data protection complaint&lt;/a&gt;
with the
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ico.gov.uk/&quot;&gt;Information Commissioner&#39;s Office&lt;/a&gt;
about a company&#39;s bad behaviour.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Take a bow, Sky TV!  Claiming that you can&#39;t
remove my details from your mailing lists
because I&#39;m not one of your customers is
stupid beyond belief.
If I&#39;m not one of your customers, never have
been and have never permitted you to have
my personal details, then you shouldn&#39;t
have them anyway and you definitely
shouldn&#39;t keep them after I&#39;ve asked you to
stop.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p>
For the first time in a while,
I've filed a
<a href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/complaints/data_protection.aspx">data protection complaint</a>
with the
<a href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/">Information Commissioner's Office</a>
about a company's bad behaviour.
</p><p>
Take a bow, Sky TV!  Claiming that you can't
remove my details from your mailing lists
because I'm not one of your customers is
stupid beyond belief.
If I'm not one of your customers, never have
been and have never permitted you to have
my personal details, then you shouldn't
have them anyway and you definitely
shouldn't keep them after I've asked you to
stop.
</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:date>2008-05-24T08:52:34+00:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item rdf:about="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/BBC_website__TV_and_Technology.html">
		<title>BBC website, TV and Technology</title>
		<link>http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/BBC_website__TV_and_Technology.html</link>
		<description>
&lt;p class=&quot;leadimg&quot;&gt;
&lt;img src=&quot;http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/attachments/satdish_sm.jpg&quot; width=&quot;120&quot; height=&quot;120&quot; alt=&quot;[Dish]&quot; title=&quot;Dish&quot; /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
(How I get TV)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The British Broadcasting Corporation,
the largest UK public service broadcaster,
is seen as a slow lumbering beast and a bit
clueless about technology,
as you can see from
&lt;a href=&quot;http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/BBC_TV__Click__Free_beer_and_facebook_flaming.html#c&quot;&gt;the comment when I wrote about Click: Free=beer and facebook-flaming&lt;/a&gt;
recently.  I think that&#39;s a pretty typical
view.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
For example,
the BBC has recently helped to launch
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.freesat.co.uk/&quot;&gt;Freesat&lt;/a&gt;
which is good in some ways (free-to-air and
maybe more standards-based than Sky) but
still publishes half-truths like
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;Installing a satellite dish is a job for professionals&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;
(On balance, it&#39;s no harder than installing
most TV aerials, in my opinion, but
remember you get no warranty on DIY.)
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
It&#39;s pretty much the same situation online,
which is why stories like
&lt;a href=&quot;http://davepress.net/2008/06/02/the-bbc-and-innovation/&quot;&gt;The BBC and innovation [DavePress]&lt;/a&gt;
and
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/good-news-for-websites-bbc-told-to-link-out-more/&quot;&gt;Good news for websites - BBC told to link out more!&lt;/a&gt;
continue to be news, nearly 12 years after
the BBC&#39;s website launched.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://web.archive.org/web/19961029213728/http://www.bbcnc.org.uk/&quot;&gt;(Source)&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
One of the few areas where BBC triumphs
is probably news-gathering, picking up
stories that are unpopular
with both business and government, like
&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7431336.stm&quot;&gt;BBC NEWS: Towns triumph in broadband tests&lt;/a&gt;
which follows the
&lt;a href=&quot;http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Update__Experts_Say_Ofcom_Wrong_About_Rural_Broadband.html&quot;&gt;Experts Say Ofcom Wrong About Rural Broadband&lt;/a&gt;
storm online.  I recently helped
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.doonofmay.org/blog/?p=21&quot;&gt;The Doon of May team look into internet connectivity&lt;/a&gt;
and I was surprised how bad it was in their
location: a bit
of attention from BBC News is most welcome.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
If you&#39;d like to try receiving the BBC - or
some other national broadcasters in Europe -
by satellite, I&#39;m currently taking
&lt;a href=&quot;http://cyclingfans.net/satellite/2008/questions-about-cycling-on-satellite&quot;&gt;Questions About Cycling on Satellite&lt;/a&gt;
over on my Cycling Fans blog.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p class="leadimg">
<img src="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/attachments/satdish_sm.jpg" width="120" height="120" alt="[Dish]" title="Dish" /><br />
(How I get TV)
</p>
<p>
The British Broadcasting Corporation,
the largest UK public service broadcaster,
is seen as a slow lumbering beast and a bit
clueless about technology,
as you can see from
<a href="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/BBC_TV__Click__Free_beer_and_facebook_flaming.html#c">the comment when I wrote about Click: Free=beer and facebook-flaming</a>
recently.  I think that's a pretty typical
view.
</p><p>
For example,
the BBC has recently helped to launch
<a href="http://www.freesat.co.uk/">Freesat</a>
which is good in some ways (free-to-air and
maybe more standards-based than Sky) but
still publishes half-truths like
</p><blockquote><p>"Installing a satellite dish is a job for professionals"</p></blockquote><p>
(On balance, it's no harder than installing
most TV aerials, in my opinion, but
remember you get no warranty on DIY.)
</p><p>
It's pretty much the same situation online,
which is why stories like
<a href="http://davepress.net/2008/06/02/the-bbc-and-innovation/">The BBC and innovation [DavePress]</a>
and
<a href="http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/good-news-for-websites-bbc-told-to-link-out-more/">Good news for websites - BBC told to link out more!</a>
continue to be news, nearly 12 years after
the BBC's website launched.
<a href="http://web.archive.org/web/19961029213728/http://www.bbcnc.org.uk/">(Source)</a>
</p><p>
One of the few areas where BBC triumphs
is probably news-gathering, picking up
stories that are unpopular
with both business and government, like
<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7431336.stm">BBC NEWS: Towns triumph in broadband tests</a>
which follows the
<a href="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Update__Experts_Say_Ofcom_Wrong_About_Rural_Broadband.html">Experts Say Ofcom Wrong About Rural Broadband</a>
storm online.  I recently helped
<a href="http://www.doonofmay.org/blog/?p=21">The Doon of May team look into internet connectivity</a>
and I was surprised how bad it was in their
location: a bit
of attention from BBC News is most welcome.
</p><p>
If you'd like to try receiving the BBC - or
some other national broadcasters in Europe -
by satellite, I'm currently taking
<a href="http://cyclingfans.net/satellite/2008/questions-about-cycling-on-satellite">Questions About Cycling on Satellite</a>
over on my Cycling Fans blog.
</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:date>2008-06-03T10:43:29+00:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
</rdf:RDF>

