<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
         xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
         xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
         xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel rdf:about="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/index.rss">
		<title>MJR&#39;s slef-reflections - Entries tagged statistics</title>
		<description>Entries tagged statistics</description>
                <link>http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/</link>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
	
		<rdf:li resource="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Update__Experts_Say_Ofcom_Wrong_About_Rural_Broadband.html" />
	
		<rdf:li resource="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/World_Environment_Day.html" />
	
		<rdf:li resource="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Online_shopping.html" />
	
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
        </channel>
	
	<item rdf:about="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Update__Experts_Say_Ofcom_Wrong_About_Rural_Broadband.html">
		<title>Update: Experts Say Ofcom Wrong About Rural Broadband</title>
		<link>http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Update__Experts_Say_Ofcom_Wrong_About_Rural_Broadband.html</link>
		<description>
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Silver_Surfer_s_Day_2008.html&quot;&gt;Last Friday, I mentioned&lt;/a&gt;
Ofcom announcing that
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ofcom.org.uk/media/news/2008/05/nr_20080522&quot;&gt;Rural broadband households overtake urban for the first time&lt;/a&gt;
and wondered whether
the Ofcom definition of broadband
is as broken as
&lt;a href=&quot;http://mjr.towers.org.uk/blog/2004-8.html#ofcommadness1103&quot;&gt;the Ofcom definition of digital television.&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Of course it is.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Apprently, it ignores download speed,
alternative access points and lots of
other aspects.  See
&lt;a href=&quot;http://simonberry.ruralnet.org.uk/2008/05/22/rural-broadband-%e2%80%93-lies-damn-lies-and-statistics/&quot;&gt;Rural broadband - lies, damn lies and statistics&lt;/a&gt;
(hey, don&#39;t blame the numbers - blame those
doing the interpretation!),
&lt;a href=&quot;http://lifetorque.blogspot.com/2008/05/ofcom-still-out-of-touch-on-broadband.html&quot;&gt;Lifetorque: Ofcom still out of touch on broadband&lt;/a&gt;
and
&lt;a href=&quot;http://swict.wordpress.com/2008/05/23/its-broadband-jim-but-not-as-we-know-it/&quot;&gt;It&#39;s Broadband Jim - but not as we know it!&lt;/a&gt;
for some of the points and links to more.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Can we ever trust any of Ofcom&#39;s statistics?
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p>
<a href="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Silver_Surfer_s_Day_2008.html">Last Friday, I mentioned</a>
Ofcom announcing that
<a href="http://www.ofcom.org.uk/media/news/2008/05/nr_20080522">Rural broadband households overtake urban for the first time</a>
and wondered whether
the Ofcom definition of broadband
is as broken as
<a href="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/blog/2004-8.html#ofcommadness1103">the Ofcom definition of digital television.</a>
</p><p>
Of course it is.
</p><p>
Apprently, it ignores download speed,
alternative access points and lots of
other aspects.  See
<a href="http://simonberry.ruralnet.org.uk/2008/05/22/rural-broadband-%e2%80%93-lies-damn-lies-and-statistics/">Rural broadband - lies, damn lies and statistics</a>
(hey, don't blame the numbers - blame those
doing the interpretation!),
<a href="http://lifetorque.blogspot.com/2008/05/ofcom-still-out-of-touch-on-broadband.html">Lifetorque: Ofcom still out of touch on broadband</a>
and
<a href="http://swict.wordpress.com/2008/05/23/its-broadband-jim-but-not-as-we-know-it/">It's Broadband Jim - but not as we know it!</a>
for some of the points and links to more.
</p><p>
Can we ever trust any of Ofcom's statistics?
</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:date>2008-05-26T17:24:34+00:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item rdf:about="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/World_Environment_Day.html">
		<title>World Environment Day</title>
		<link>http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/World_Environment_Day.html</link>
		<description>
&lt;p&gt;
Today is
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unep.org/wed/2008/english/&quot;&gt;World Environment Day 2008&lt;/a&gt;
and also
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.recyclenowpartners.org.uk/local_authorities/news/are_you_ready_for.html&quot;&gt;Recycle Week in the UK.&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Locally,
our poor recycling record has attracted
attention.  The main Somerset CC area averages
50% recycling and composting,
while North Somerset only does 36%.
This will cost us money, as explained under
the subtly-titled local newspaper article
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thisissomerset.co.uk/displayNode.jsp?nodeId=147472&amp;amp;command=displayContent&amp;amp;sourceNode=147472&amp;amp;contentPK=20792383&amp;amp;folderPk=84808&quot;&gt;&#39;REDUCE WASTE NOW OR FACE A £12M FINE&#39;&lt;/a&gt;
It&#39;s very annoying to read
a Conservative councillor say
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;The message we really have to get out to people is that this is their problem too.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;
We
&lt;strong&gt;know&lt;/strong&gt;
it&#39;s a bloody problem.  Have you
tried to use your stupid recycling system?
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Criticism of the stupid collections&lt;/strong&gt;
is strangely absent from the local Lib-Dem&#39;s
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mike-bell.org.uk/news/000428/mid_table_place_shouldnt_be_good_enough_when_it_comes_to_recycling.html&quot;&gt;Mid table place shouldn&#39;t be good enough when it comes to recycling (Mike Bell)&lt;/a&gt;
and I can&#39;t even find recycling mentioned
on local Labour sites - I think those two
groups may have been in coalition
when the stupid system was introduced.
It&#39;s left to
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wsmforum.co.uk/index.php?topic=15.0&quot;&gt;local residents to explain the problem.&lt;/a&gt;  
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.n-somerset.gov.uk/waste/&quot;&gt;Local waste collections have been simplified recently&lt;/a&gt;
but it still seems bloody awkward, taking
different types of waste to different places.
The most recent edition of the council&#39;s
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.n-somerset.gov.uk/Your+Council/Communication+and+information/North+Somerset+Life/default.htm&quot;&gt;North Somerset Life&lt;/a&gt;
magazine explained that they don&#39;t collect
plastic bottles from the doorstep because
it would add £10 per year to our local tax.
I&#39;m damn sure it already costs me more than that
to store them and ferry them into town
over a year.  The only people rewarded by
saving that £10 seem to be those who
live near the town centre collection point,
drive to that Tesco anyway, or
don&#39;t recycle plastics.  Why reward them?
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Speaking of Tesco...&lt;/strong&gt;
those
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nomillroadtesco.org/&quot;&gt;national&lt;/a&gt;
and
&lt;a href=&quot;http://bristol.indymedia.org/article/688196&quot;&gt;local favourites&lt;/a&gt;
have applied to build
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thewestonmercury.co.uk/content/twm/news/story.aspx?brand=Westonmercury&amp;amp;category=news&amp;amp;tBrand=westonmercury&amp;amp;tCategory=znews&amp;amp;itemid=WeED04%20Jun%202008%2016%3A30%3A52%3A210&quot;&gt;Two more Tesco stores for Weston [The Weston Mercury]&lt;/a&gt;
including one directly opposite another
supermarket.
The application number is
&lt;a href=&quot;http://wam.n-somerset.gov.uk/MULTIWAM/showCaseFile.do?appNumber=08/P/1230/F&quot;&gt;08/P/1230/F&lt;/a&gt;
if you want to respond.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;The planning system seems my main
chance to protect my local environment&lt;/strong&gt; at
the moment. Next Monday evening at 7.30pm,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://wam.n-somerset.gov.uk/MULTIWAM/showCaseFile.do?appNumber=08/P/1070/F&quot;&gt;08/P/1070/F - Erection of 5 storey building to provide 14 flats, restaurant and office with basement parking following demolition of restaurant&lt;/a&gt;
will be considered by a
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kewstoke.org/parish.htm&quot;&gt;Kewstoke village council&lt;/a&gt;
planning meeting in the village hall.
As I understand it,
the public may make statements at the
start of the meeting and
2 Kewstoke Road is currently the Castle.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p>
Today is
<a href="http://www.unep.org/wed/2008/english/">World Environment Day 2008</a>
and also
<a href="http://www.recyclenowpartners.org.uk/local_authorities/news/are_you_ready_for.html">Recycle Week in the UK.</a>
</p><p>
Locally,
our poor recycling record has attracted
attention.  The main Somerset CC area averages
50% recycling and composting,
while North Somerset only does 36%.
This will cost us money, as explained under
the subtly-titled local newspaper article
<a href="http://www.thisissomerset.co.uk/displayNode.jsp?nodeId=147472&amp;command=displayContent&amp;sourceNode=147472&amp;contentPK=20792383&amp;folderPk=84808">'REDUCE WASTE NOW OR FACE A £12M FINE'</a>
It's very annoying to read
a Conservative councillor say
</p><blockquote><p>"The message we really have to get out to people is that this is their problem too."</p></blockquote><p>
We
<strong>know</strong>
it's a bloody problem.  Have you
tried to use your stupid recycling system?
</p><p>
<strong>Criticism of the stupid collections</strong>
is strangely absent from the local Lib-Dem's
<a href="http://www.mike-bell.org.uk/news/000428/mid_table_place_shouldnt_be_good_enough_when_it_comes_to_recycling.html">Mid table place shouldn't be good enough when it comes to recycling (Mike Bell)</a>
and I can't even find recycling mentioned
on local Labour sites - I think those two
groups may have been in coalition
when the stupid system was introduced.
It's left to
<a href="http://www.wsmforum.co.uk/index.php?topic=15.0">local residents to explain the problem.</a>  
</p><p>
<a href="http://www.n-somerset.gov.uk/waste/">Local waste collections have been simplified recently</a>
but it still seems bloody awkward, taking
different types of waste to different places.
The most recent edition of the council's
<a href="http://www.n-somerset.gov.uk/Your+Council/Communication+and+information/North+Somerset+Life/default.htm">North Somerset Life</a>
magazine explained that they don't collect
plastic bottles from the doorstep because
it would add £10 per year to our local tax.
I'm damn sure it already costs me more than that
to store them and ferry them into town
over a year.  The only people rewarded by
saving that £10 seem to be those who
live near the town centre collection point,
drive to that Tesco anyway, or
don't recycle plastics.  Why reward them?
</p><p>
<strong>Speaking of Tesco...</strong>
those
<a href="http://www.nomillroadtesco.org/">national</a>
and
<a href="http://bristol.indymedia.org/article/688196">local favourites</a>
have applied to build
<a href="http://www.thewestonmercury.co.uk/content/twm/news/story.aspx?brand=Westonmercury&amp;category=news&amp;tBrand=westonmercury&amp;tCategory=znews&amp;itemid=WeED04%20Jun%202008%2016%3A30%3A52%3A210">Two more Tesco stores for Weston [The Weston Mercury]</a>
including one directly opposite another
supermarket.
The application number is
<a href="http://wam.n-somerset.gov.uk/MULTIWAM/showCaseFile.do?appNumber=08/P/1230/F">08/P/1230/F</a>
if you want to respond.
</p><p>
<strong>The planning system seems my main
chance to protect my local environment</strong> at
the moment. Next Monday evening at 7.30pm,
<a href="http://wam.n-somerset.gov.uk/MULTIWAM/showCaseFile.do?appNumber=08/P/1070/F">08/P/1070/F - Erection of 5 storey building to provide 14 flats, restaurant and office with basement parking following demolition of restaurant</a>
will be considered by a
<a href="http://www.kewstoke.org/parish.htm">Kewstoke village council</a>
planning meeting in the village hall.
As I understand it,
the public may make statements at the
start of the meeting and
2 Kewstoke Road is currently the Castle.
</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:date>2008-06-05T15:04:16+00:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item rdf:about="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Online_shopping.html">
		<title>Online shopping</title>
		<link>http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Online_shopping.html</link>
		<description>
&lt;p&gt;
I maintain a number of web shops for
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ttllp.co.uk/&quot;&gt;our webmaster cooperative&lt;/a&gt;
and one of our main challenges is to
encourage people who put things into
their basket/cart to actually buy them.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.grahamjones.co.uk/2008/06/how-to-avoid-shopping-cart-abandonment.htm&quot;&gt;How to avoid shopping cart abandonment by Graham Jones&lt;/a&gt;
makes some points that I&#39;ve identified as
possible reasons for people not buying
in the past: comparisons,
robots and not trusting the site enough to
give payment details.
There&#39;s not much we can do about robots or
people comparison-shopping at a technical
level, but
we try to build some trust by publishing
the shop owner&#39;s geographic address and
telephone number (which I think is required
by law in England for most web shops now),
making sure the SSL certificate and domain
registration details are correct,
using reputable payment
providers and being clear about
delivery charges and terms.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
The point about the
slickness of the checkout process is a good
one and one that we&#39;ve only recently started
to work on.  We&#39;ve had pretty good
results from making the checkout slicker
on one site.  It looks like two-thirds of
people who click the checkout button now
continue to buy, putting it comfortably ahead of
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.coremetrics.co.uk/solutions/benchmarking.php&quot;&gt;current UK averages&lt;/a&gt;
but I need to tweak our stats calculator to
make the report directly comparable.
Nevertheless, I think those improvements
will be added to our other shops as soon as
possible.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
I share Graham&#39;s low opinion of the oft-quoted
Amazon.
We&#39;ve also been looking at other web shop
software besides
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oscommerce.com/&quot;&gt;OSCommerce&lt;/a&gt;
for a new project, so now would be
a good time to change to something new if
it improves the checkout a lot.
We&#39;ve made OSCommerce&#39;s checkout a lot
smoother, but it&#39;s still essentially OSC.
Is there a good checkout which you&#39;d want
to use as an example?
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
The other challenge is getting visitors onto
the site in the first place.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/how-to-build-links/&quot;&gt;How To Build Links By Patrick Altoft&lt;/a&gt;
explains the basics as well as I&#39;ve seen
recently.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p>
I maintain a number of web shops for
<a href="http://www.ttllp.co.uk/">our webmaster cooperative</a>
and one of our main challenges is to
encourage people who put things into
their basket/cart to actually buy them.
</p><p>
<a href="http://www.grahamjones.co.uk/2008/06/how-to-avoid-shopping-cart-abandonment.htm">How to avoid shopping cart abandonment by Graham Jones</a>
makes some points that I've identified as
possible reasons for people not buying
in the past: comparisons,
robots and not trusting the site enough to
give payment details.
There's not much we can do about robots or
people comparison-shopping at a technical
level, but
we try to build some trust by publishing
the shop owner's geographic address and
telephone number (which I think is required
by law in England for most web shops now),
making sure the SSL certificate and domain
registration details are correct,
using reputable payment
providers and being clear about
delivery charges and terms.
</p><p>
The point about the
slickness of the checkout process is a good
one and one that we've only recently started
to work on.  We've had pretty good
results from making the checkout slicker
on one site.  It looks like two-thirds of
people who click the checkout button now
continue to buy, putting it comfortably ahead of
<a href="http://www.coremetrics.co.uk/solutions/benchmarking.php">current UK averages</a>
but I need to tweak our stats calculator to
make the report directly comparable.
Nevertheless, I think those improvements
will be added to our other shops as soon as
possible.
</p><p>
I share Graham's low opinion of the oft-quoted
Amazon.
We've also been looking at other web shop
software besides
<a href="http://www.oscommerce.com/">OSCommerce</a>
for a new project, so now would be
a good time to change to something new if
it improves the checkout a lot.
We've made OSCommerce's checkout a lot
smoother, but it's still essentially OSC.
Is there a good checkout which you'd want
to use as an example?
</p><p>
The other challenge is getting visitors onto
the site in the first place.
<a href="http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/how-to-build-links/">How To Build Links By Patrick Altoft</a>
explains the basics as well as I've seen
recently.
</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:date>2008-06-10T11:48:38+00:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
</rdf:RDF>

