<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
         xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
         xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
         xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel rdf:about="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/index.rss">
		<title>MJR&#39;s slef-reflections - Entries tagged web</title>
		<description>Entries tagged web</description>
                <link>http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/</link>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
	
		<rdf:li resource="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/21_today__MJR_around_the_web___.html" />
	
		<rdf:li resource="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Explaining_web_site_improvements__what_s_important_to_you_.html" />
	
		<rdf:li resource="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/UK_mobile_micropublishing_choices_.html" />
	
		<rdf:li resource="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Updated_GnuPG_Key_Expiry.html" />
	
		<rdf:li resource="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Posting_Ahead.html" />
	
		<rdf:li resource="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/No_Battles___Just_Stand_Firm_On_Best_Practice.html" />
	
		<rdf:li resource="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/BBC_TV__Click__Free_beer_and_facebook_flaming.html" />
	
		<rdf:li resource="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Updating_the_Accounts.html" />
	
		<rdf:li resource="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Silver_Surfer_s_Day_2008.html" />
	
		<rdf:li resource="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Update__Experts_Say_Ofcom_Wrong_About_Rural_Broadband.html" />
	
		<rdf:li resource="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Quick_Question__opticaljungle_com___publicdomainregistry_com_.html" />
	
		<rdf:li resource="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Told_You_So__Exhibitions_and_Spammer_Registrars.html" />
	
		<rdf:li resource="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Please_Tell_Me_How_To_Do_It.html" />
	
		<rdf:li resource="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/BBC_website__TV_and_Technology.html" />
	
		<rdf:li resource="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Hosting_Blogs_on_Multiple_Servers.html" />
	
		<rdf:li resource="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Bridgwater_College_Computing_Advisory_Panel.html" />
	
		<rdf:li resource="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Fixing_things_the_wrong_way.html" />
	
		<rdf:li resource="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Online_shopping.html" />
	
		<rdf:li resource="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Warning_for_Webmasters__Friday_13th_ahoy_.html" />
	
		<rdf:li resource="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Forthcoming__and_past__Events_News__LUGoG__BikeWeek__HacktionLab__SPI.html" />
	
		<rdf:li resource="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/7_Reasons_Why_Firefox_3_Download_Day_Sucks.html" />
	
		<rdf:li resource="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Firefox_3__day_3__first_impressions.html" />
	
		<rdf:li resource="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Firefox_3__day_6__security_flaw_and_banks.html" />
	
		<rdf:li resource="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Firefox_3__day_10__security_flaw_2__more_banks__looking_for_a_new_browser.html" />
	
		<rdf:li resource="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/End_of_LugRadio_.html" />
	
		<rdf:li resource="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/End_of_this_blog_.html" />
	
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
        </channel>
	
	<item rdf:about="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/21_today__MJR_around_the_web___.html">
		<title>21 today! MJR around the web...</title>
		<link>http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/21_today__MJR_around_the_web___.html</link>
		<description>
&lt;p&gt;
Not done one of these round-ups for a while and
I&#39;m really pushed for time today, so
here are some sites that I&#39;ve written on:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=
&quot;http://www.deborahlipp.com/wordpress/?p=1394#comment-64271&quot;&gt;Property
of a Lady » Wicca on House&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=
&quot;http://www.burtonini.com/blog/life/homoeopathy-2007-11-16-08-45?showcomments=yes#&quot;&gt;
Ross Burton: The End Of Homeopathy?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.bigballofwax.co.nz/?p=683&quot;&gt;»
Enough with the dried yoghurt covered raisins Korerorero: Just
random ranting and raving&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=
&quot;http://www.freesoftwaremagazine.com/blogs/how_to_host_a_free_software_advocacy_event&quot;&gt;
How to host a free software advocacy event | Free Software
Magazine&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=
&quot;http://raw-output.org/20071120/agpl&quot;&gt;Raw Output: AGPL&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=
&quot;http://lambdaman.blogspot.com/2007/11/facebook-comments.html&quot;&gt;One
for the Morning Glory: Facebook comments&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.liddicott.com/~sam/?p=84&quot;&gt;Sam
Liddicott » GPL3 Questions and Implications&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=
&quot;http://etbe.coker.com.au/2007/11/23/drugs-and-an-election/&quot;&gt;
Drugs and an Election | etbe&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=
&quot;http://tropicanawatch.org.uk/2007/11/23/new-tropicana-images/&quot;&gt;
New Tropicana images «&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=
&quot;http://www.robmyers.org/weblog/2007/11/24/support-by-sasfdl-compatibility-not-by-safdl-compatibility/&quot;&gt;
robmyers - Support BY-SA/SFDL Compatibility, Not BY-SA/FDL
Compatibility&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=
&quot;http://www.grahamjones.co.uk/2007/11/teenagers-do-not-need-our-help-online.htm&quot;&gt;
Internet Psychology: Teenagers do not need our help online - we
need them to help us oldies by Graham Jones, Internet
Psychologist&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=
&quot;http://www.davidleeking.com/2007/11/29/wanting-your-opinions-about-blog-comments-and-city-attorneys/&quot;&gt;
Wanting Your Opinions about Blog Comments and City Attorneys :
David Lee King&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=
&quot;http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/12/01/zookoda-i-dont-recommend-them-anymore/&quot;&gt;
Zookoda - I Don&#39;t Recommend them Anymore&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=
&quot;http://www.solarwaterheating.eu/ShowBlog.aspx?BlogID=15&quot;&gt;Solar
Water Heating :: ShowBlog&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=
&quot;http://www.grahamjones.co.uk/2007/12/forget-email-its-old-hat.htm&quot;&gt;
Internet Psychology: Forget email - it&#39;s old hat by Graham Jones,
Internet Psychologist&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=
&quot;http://www.drake.org.uk/2007/12/thats-a-wrap-ti.html?cid=93223128&quot;&gt;
Drake.org.uk: That&#39;s a wrap! Time to roll the end
credits..&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=
&quot;http://www.grahamjones.co.uk/2007/12/internet-criminals-are-going-to-have.htm&quot;&gt;
Internet Psychology: Internet criminals are going to have a field
day by Graham Jones, Internet Psychologist&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=
&quot;http://cambridgeco-operation.blogspot.com/2007/12/rebranded-stores.html&quot;&gt;
A Cambridge Co-operator: Rebranded Stores&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=
&quot;http://www.robmyers.org/weblog/2007/12/07/two-common-errors/&quot;&gt;
robmyers - Two Common Errors&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=
&quot;http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/blog/?p=265&quot;&gt;Lucas
Nussbaum&#39;s Blog » Blog Archive » Where is the NM
bottleneck?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=
&quot;http://blog.madism.org/index.php/2007/12/12/146-nm-fd-is-fixed?cos=1&quot;&gt;
NM: FD is fixed - MadBlog&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p>
Not done one of these round-ups for a while and
I'm really pushed for time today, so
here are some sites that I've written on:</p>
<ol>
<li><a href=
"http://www.deborahlipp.com/wordpress/?p=1394#comment-64271">Property
of a Lady » Wicca on House</a></li>
<li><a href=
"http://www.burtonini.com/blog/life/homoeopathy-2007-11-16-08-45?showcomments=yes#">
Ross Burton: The End Of Homeopathy?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blog.bigballofwax.co.nz/?p=683">»
Enough with the dried yoghurt covered raisins Korerorero: Just
random ranting and raving</a></li>
<li><a href=
"http://www.freesoftwaremagazine.com/blogs/how_to_host_a_free_software_advocacy_event">
How to host a free software advocacy event | Free Software
Magazine</a></li>
<li><a href=
"http://raw-output.org/20071120/agpl">Raw Output: AGPL</a></li>
<li><a href=
"http://lambdaman.blogspot.com/2007/11/facebook-comments.html">One
for the Morning Glory: Facebook comments</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.liddicott.com/~sam/?p=84">Sam
Liddicott » GPL3 Questions and Implications</a></li>
<li><a href=
"http://etbe.coker.com.au/2007/11/23/drugs-and-an-election/">
Drugs and an Election | etbe</a></li>
<li><a href=
"http://tropicanawatch.org.uk/2007/11/23/new-tropicana-images/">
New Tropicana images «</a></li>
<li><a href=
"http://www.robmyers.org/weblog/2007/11/24/support-by-sasfdl-compatibility-not-by-safdl-compatibility/">
robmyers - Support BY-SA/SFDL Compatibility, Not BY-SA/FDL
Compatibility</a></li>
<li><a href=
"http://www.grahamjones.co.uk/2007/11/teenagers-do-not-need-our-help-online.htm">
Internet Psychology: Teenagers do not need our help online - we
need them to help us oldies by Graham Jones, Internet
Psychologist</a></li>
<li><a href=
"http://www.davidleeking.com/2007/11/29/wanting-your-opinions-about-blog-comments-and-city-attorneys/">
Wanting Your Opinions about Blog Comments and City Attorneys :
David Lee King</a></li>
<li><a href=
"http://www.problogger.net/archives/2007/12/01/zookoda-i-dont-recommend-them-anymore/">
Zookoda - I Don't Recommend them Anymore</a></li>
<li><a href=
"http://www.solarwaterheating.eu/ShowBlog.aspx?BlogID=15">Solar
Water Heating :: ShowBlog</a></li>
<li><a href=
"http://www.grahamjones.co.uk/2007/12/forget-email-its-old-hat.htm">
Internet Psychology: Forget email - it's old hat by Graham Jones,
Internet Psychologist</a></li>
<li><a href=
"http://www.drake.org.uk/2007/12/thats-a-wrap-ti.html?cid=93223128">
Drake.org.uk: That's a wrap! Time to roll the end
credits..</a></li>
<li><a href=
"http://www.grahamjones.co.uk/2007/12/internet-criminals-are-going-to-have.htm">
Internet Psychology: Internet criminals are going to have a field
day by Graham Jones, Internet Psychologist</a></li>
<li><a href=
"http://cambridgeco-operation.blogspot.com/2007/12/rebranded-stores.html">
A Cambridge Co-operator: Rebranded Stores</a></li>
<li><a href=
"http://www.robmyers.org/weblog/2007/12/07/two-common-errors/">
robmyers - Two Common Errors</a></li>
<li><a href=
"http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/blog/?p=265">Lucas
Nussbaum's Blog » Blog Archive » Where is the NM
bottleneck?</a></li>
<li><a href=
"http://blog.madism.org/index.php/2007/12/12/146-nm-fd-is-fixed?cos=1">
NM: FD is fixed - MadBlog</a></li>
</ol>
 ]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:date>2008-04-17T13:44:57+00:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item rdf:about="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Explaining_web_site_improvements__what_s_important_to_you_.html">
		<title>Explaining web site improvements: what&#39;s important to you?</title>
		<link>http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Explaining_web_site_improvements__what_s_important_to_you_.html</link>
		<description>
&lt;p class=&quot;leadimg&quot;&gt;
&lt;img src=&quot;http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/attachments/traffic.jpg&quot; width=&quot;120&quot; height=&quot;120&quot; alt=&quot;[Photo of Some Traffic]&quot; title=&quot;Real World Traffic&quot; /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Is this traffic or congestion?
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
This is one of those Friday Afternoon Projects
- it&#39;s been put off all through a busy week
because it&#39;s unpaid,
I&#39;m not completely sure how to approach it
and now my arms hurt like hell
from travel jabs which are making it hard to
concentrate!  So I&#39;m going to float it on here...
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
I&#39;ve been asked to brief a meeting next week
about that group&#39;s current web site and
its problems.  I&#39;m not linking it yet to avoid
insulting/embarrassing them.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
The site looks OK,
but doesn&#39;t rank well on search engines
and doesn&#39;t allow much member participation.
I need to explain why that&#39;s a bad thing and
how the site&#39;s technical choices
have led to that.
I&#39;m not directly pitching for 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ttllp.co.uk/&quot;&gt;TTLLP&lt;/a&gt;
to get any work (because
I&#39;m a member of that group, it might
be a conflict of interest and we&#39;re pretty
busy anyway - even our own site needs work on
some of the points I&#39;m going to mention),
but I don&#39;t want to be unhappy
if we&#39;re asked to
implement my recommendations.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
I&#39;ve got a usual outline that I follow,
but my presentation&#39;s time is limited,
so I&#39;d like to ask you: what about this is
important and what isn&#39;t?
If you give me useful feedback, I&#39;ll put you
in the Acknowledgements with a backlink and
I hope the briefing will be shared pretty
widely over the next few months.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
The current plan is to start
with a basic explanation of
how search engines rank pages, as far as we
can tell, referring to
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sirgroane.net/google-page-rank/&quot;&gt;PageRank Explained Correctly with Examples, by Ian Rogers&lt;/a&gt;
as well as the shorter official summaries
from the dominant search sites at
&lt;a href=&quot;http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/search/ranking/&quot;&gt;Yahoo,&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.msdn.com/webmaster/archive/2008/01/11/i-m-not-ranking-in-live-search-what-can-i-do.aspx&quot;&gt;Microsoft&lt;/a&gt;
and
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/technology/index.html&quot;&gt;Google.&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Then I go through a quick evaluation
of the site against the basics of validation,
accessibility and robot-friendliness,
followed by a couple of SEO-style checks of
its current rankings and inbound links.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Next is a bit different because I have access
to some of their web access stats: I summarise
what we know and suggest some other stats
they&#39;ve probably not considered
and why they&#39;re useful, along the lines of
&lt;a href=&quot;http://davepress.net/2008/04/17/how-do-you-measure-blog-success/&quot;&gt;Dave Briggs&#39;s measures of blog success.&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Finally, I suggest ways to improve the
site.  The top tip will be to take control
of the site hosting and stop using the
cheap and cheerful donated server that makes
all links except the front page point
to another domain.  I&#39;ll probably suggest
a mix of free and open source software
tools to power it.
If they don&#39;t want to move it all yet,
I&#39;ll suggest running a second site for
member participation, using tools like
Wordpress, NoseRub and so on.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
What do you think?  Plan for success, am
I missing some tricks, or am I setting myself
up for
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.asktog.com/columns/047HowToWriteAReport.html&quot;&gt;a lynching?&lt;/a&gt;
Let me know with a comment or email, please.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p class="leadimg">
<img src="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/attachments/traffic.jpg" width="120" height="120" alt="[Photo of Some Traffic]" title="Real World Traffic" /><br />
Is this traffic or congestion?
</p><p>
This is one of those Friday Afternoon Projects
- it's been put off all through a busy week
because it's unpaid,
I'm not completely sure how to approach it
and now my arms hurt like hell
from travel jabs which are making it hard to
concentrate!  So I'm going to float it on here...
</p><p>
I've been asked to brief a meeting next week
about that group's current web site and
its problems.  I'm not linking it yet to avoid
insulting/embarrassing them.
</p><p>
The site looks OK,
but doesn't rank well on search engines
and doesn't allow much member participation.
I need to explain why that's a bad thing and
how the site's technical choices
have led to that.
I'm not directly pitching for 
<a href="http://www.ttllp.co.uk/">TTLLP</a>
to get any work (because
I'm a member of that group, it might
be a conflict of interest and we're pretty
busy anyway - even our own site needs work on
some of the points I'm going to mention),
but I don't want to be unhappy
if we're asked to
implement my recommendations.
</p><p>
I've got a usual outline that I follow,
but my presentation's time is limited,
so I'd like to ask you: what about this is
important and what isn't?
If you give me useful feedback, I'll put you
in the Acknowledgements with a backlink and
I hope the briefing will be shared pretty
widely over the next few months.
</p><p>
The current plan is to start
with a basic explanation of
how search engines rank pages, as far as we
can tell, referring to
<a href="http://www.sirgroane.net/google-page-rank/">PageRank Explained Correctly with Examples, by Ian Rogers</a>
as well as the shorter official summaries
from the dominant search sites at
<a href="http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/search/ranking/">Yahoo,</a>
<a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/webmaster/archive/2008/01/11/i-m-not-ranking-in-live-search-what-can-i-do.aspx">Microsoft</a>
and
<a href="http://www.google.com/technology/index.html">Google.</a>
</p><p>
Then I go through a quick evaluation
of the site against the basics of validation,
accessibility and robot-friendliness,
followed by a couple of SEO-style checks of
its current rankings and inbound links.
</p><p>
Next is a bit different because I have access
to some of their web access stats: I summarise
what we know and suggest some other stats
they've probably not considered
and why they're useful, along the lines of
<a href="http://davepress.net/2008/04/17/how-do-you-measure-blog-success/">Dave Briggs's measures of blog success.</a>
</p><p>
Finally, I suggest ways to improve the
site.  The top tip will be to take control
of the site hosting and stop using the
cheap and cheerful donated server that makes
all links except the front page point
to another domain.  I'll probably suggest
a mix of free and open source software
tools to power it.
If they don't want to move it all yet,
I'll suggest running a second site for
member participation, using tools like
Wordpress, NoseRub and so on.
</p><p>
What do you think?  Plan for success, am
I missing some tricks, or am I setting myself
up for
<a href="http://www.asktog.com/columns/047HowToWriteAReport.html">a lynching?</a>
Let me know with a comment or email, please.
</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:date>2008-04-18T12:32:33+00:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item rdf:about="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/UK_mobile_micropublishing_choices_.html">
		<title>UK mobile micropublishing choices?</title>
		<link>http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/UK_mobile_micropublishing_choices_.html</link>
		<description>
&lt;p class=&quot;leadimg&quot;&gt;
&lt;img src=&quot;http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/attachments/mopho.jpg&quot; width=&quot;120&quot; height=&quot;120&quot; alt=&quot;[Photo of Phone]&quot; title=&quot;Phone from gallery.hd.com&quot; /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
My communications connection
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I&#39;m going travelling this summer.
I don&#39;t know what internet connection I&#39;ll
have (if any) but I&#39;m pretty sure I&#39;ll have
fairly cheap SMS access from my phone.
Maybe even MMS.
So, I want to use one of the
mobile micropublishers to try to avoid
sending international SMSes to
lots of people.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.facebook.com&quot;&gt;Facebook&lt;/a&gt;
doesn&#39;t look good - it gives a shortcode
(which would cost me extra to use and I
don&#39;t know whether it works while roaming),
has no number for SMS that I found and
it looks like O2 is the only UK carrier it
knows - bizarre.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.livejournal.org&quot;&gt;LiveJournal&lt;/a&gt;
has mobile access but
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.livejournal.com/support/faqbrowse.bml?faqcat=mobile&quot;&gt;the FAQ&lt;/a&gt;
makes it look like it&#39;s only for paying users.
If I was sure it was going to work, I might
pay and support the GPL&#39;d codebase.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jaiku.com/&quot;&gt;Jaiku&lt;/a&gt;
is cost-free and gives an SMS number,
but is joining the
&lt;a href=&quot;http://tom.acrewoods.net/blog/2006/sep/green-party-motion-boycott-google-yahoo-and-micros&quot;&gt;Goolag&lt;/a&gt;
and I don&#39;t
see how to download their Java applet.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.twitter.com&quot;&gt;Twitter&lt;/a&gt;
is cost-free, gives an SMS number
and looks like it plays nice with Jabber
(which is already on my phone),
so that looks good but I found
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vitalist.com/neteffect/archives/sms-and-im-actions-to-your-inbox-with-twitter-and-vitalist/#comment-10897&quot;&gt;some complaints about whether SMSes get through.&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.20six.co.uk/&quot;&gt;20six&lt;/a&gt;
is a German-based cost-free service which
takes SMS and email (which is also on
my phone), so that also looks good,
but there are some old doubts about whether
it will stay cost-free.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Is there a service you&#39;d recommend?
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p class="leadimg">
<img src="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/attachments/mopho.jpg" width="120" height="120" alt="[Photo of Phone]" title="Phone from gallery.hd.com" /><br />
My communications connection
</p>
<p>
I'm going travelling this summer.
I don't know what internet connection I'll
have (if any) but I'm pretty sure I'll have
fairly cheap SMS access from my phone.
Maybe even MMS.
So, I want to use one of the
mobile micropublishers to try to avoid
sending international SMSes to
lots of people.
</p><p>
<a href="http://www.facebook.com">Facebook</a>
doesn't look good - it gives a shortcode
(which would cost me extra to use and I
don't know whether it works while roaming),
has no number for SMS that I found and
it looks like O2 is the only UK carrier it
knows - bizarre.
</p><p>
<a href="http://www.livejournal.org">LiveJournal</a>
has mobile access but
<a href="http://www.livejournal.com/support/faqbrowse.bml?faqcat=mobile">the FAQ</a>
makes it look like it's only for paying users.
If I was sure it was going to work, I might
pay and support the GPL'd codebase.
</p><p>
<a href="http://www.jaiku.com/">Jaiku</a>
is cost-free and gives an SMS number,
but is joining the
<a href="http://tom.acrewoods.net/blog/2006/sep/green-party-motion-boycott-google-yahoo-and-micros">Goolag</a>
and I don't
see how to download their Java applet.
</p><p>
<a href="http://www.twitter.com">Twitter</a>
is cost-free, gives an SMS number
and looks like it plays nice with Jabber
(which is already on my phone),
so that looks good but I found
<a href="http://www.vitalist.com/neteffect/archives/sms-and-im-actions-to-your-inbox-with-twitter-and-vitalist/#comment-10897">some complaints about whether SMSes get through.</a>
</p><p>
<a href="http://www.20six.co.uk/">20six</a>
is a German-based cost-free service which
takes SMS and email (which is also on
my phone), so that also looks good,
but there are some old doubts about whether
it will stay cost-free.
</p><p>
Is there a service you'd recommend?
</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:date>2008-04-26T01:08:35+00:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item rdf:about="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Updated_GnuPG_Key_Expiry.html">
		<title>Updated GnuPG Key Expiry</title>
		<link>http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Updated_GnuPG_Key_Expiry.html</link>
		<description>
&lt;p&gt;
I&#39;m still alive, so it&#39;s past time to
update the signature on
&lt;a href=&quot;http://mjr.towers.org.uk/comp/gpgpubkey.txt&quot;&gt;my gpg key&lt;/a&gt;
into next year.
The key phrase in
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gnupg.org/gph/en/manual.html#AEN329&quot;&gt;the handbook&lt;/a&gt;
is:
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;The expiration time is updated by
&lt;strong&gt;deleting&lt;/strong&gt;
the old self-signature and adding a new self-signature.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;
but somehow I always have to look it up,
so I thought I&#39;d make a note of it here.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
It looks like
&lt;a href=&quot;http://keyring.debian.org/replacing_keys.html&quot;&gt;debian-keyring should update&lt;/a&gt;
now I did --send-key to it,
but I guess I&#39;ll find out in a few weeks.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p>
I'm still alive, so it's past time to
update the signature on
<a href="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/comp/gpgpubkey.txt">my gpg key</a>
into next year.
The key phrase in
<a href="http://www.gnupg.org/gph/en/manual.html#AEN329">the handbook</a>
is:
</p><blockquote><p>"The expiration time is updated by
<strong>deleting</strong>
the old self-signature and adding a new self-signature."</p></blockquote><p>
but somehow I always have to look it up,
so I thought I'd make a note of it here.
</p><p>
It looks like
<a href="http://keyring.debian.org/replacing_keys.html">debian-keyring should update</a>
now I did --send-key to it,
but I guess I'll find out in a few weeks.
</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:date>2008-04-28T12:42:37+00:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item rdf:about="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Posting_Ahead.html">
		<title>Posting Ahead</title>
		<link>http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Posting_Ahead.html</link>
		<description>
&lt;p&gt;
I&#39;m convinced by
&lt;a href=&quot;http://networkbloggingtips.com/the-argument-for-posting-ahead/&quot;&gt;The Argument for Posting Ahead [Network Blogging]&lt;/a&gt;
so why didn&#39;t I set it up for
&lt;a href=&quot;http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Back_from_Cuba.html&quot;&gt;my recent trip?&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Well, a while ago, I had a bit of an email discussion with
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.steve.org.uk/&quot;&gt;Steve&lt;/a&gt;
about delayed posting features for
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.steve.org.uk/Software/chronicle/&quot;&gt;Chronicle&lt;/a&gt;
which I think ended with the addition of chronicle-spooler
to the released files.
I initially suggested ignoring a post when its Date
is in the future, like
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wordpress.org/&quot;&gt;Wordpress&lt;/a&gt;
does, but I think that wouldn&#39;t be backwards-compatible
and isn&#39;t as flexibile as it could be.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
chronicle-spooler works by moving files from a spool dir
into a live dir.  I&#39;d forgotten how much it confuses me
when files on a &quot;static&quot; site start moving themselves
around.  It means I have to merge before upload, which
isn&#39;t a big change, but still annoying.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
So, I&#39;ve added the following lines to chronicle to
skip entries with a Publish header in the future:-
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;pre&gt;
--- chronicle-2.7/bin/chronicle.orig	2008-05-15 10:13:55.000000000 +0100
+++ chronicle-2.7/bin/chronicle	2008-05-15 10:13:43.000000000 +0100
@@ -607,7 +607,8 @@
         #  Read the entry and store all the data away as a
         # hash element keyed upon the (unique) filename.
         #
-        $results{ $file } = readBlogEntry($file);
+        my $result =  readBlogEntry($file);
+        if ($result) { $results{ $file } = $result; }
     }
 
     #
@@ -1479,7 +1480,7 @@
     my $tags    = &quot;&quot;;    # entry tags.
     my $body    = &quot;&quot;;    # entry body.
     my $date    = &quot;&quot;;    # entry date
-    my $publish = &quot;&quot;;    # entry publish date - *ignored*

+    my $publish = &quot;&quot;;    # entry publish date
 
     open( ENTRY, &quot;&amp;lt;&quot;, $filename ) or die &quot;Failed to read $filename $!&quot;;
     while ( my $line = &amp;lt;ENTRY&amp;gt; )
@@ -1527,6 +1528,14 @@
     }
     close(ENTRY);
 
+    # MJR - embargo stuff until its publish date.
+    # Steve recommends using chronicle-spooler,
+    # but I want uploaded files to stay where I put them,
+    # else I get my local copy confused.
+    if (($publish ne &quot;&quot;) &amp;&amp; (str2time($publish) &amp;gt; time())) {
+    	return 0;
+    }
+
     #
     #  Determine the input format to use.
     #
&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;p&gt;
I think that&#39;s compatible with chronicle-spooler, too...
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p>
I'm convinced by
<a href="http://networkbloggingtips.com/the-argument-for-posting-ahead/">The Argument for Posting Ahead [Network Blogging]</a>
so why didn't I set it up for
<a href="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Back_from_Cuba.html">my recent trip?</a>
</p><p>
Well, a while ago, I had a bit of an email discussion with
<a href="http://www.steve.org.uk/">Steve</a>
about delayed posting features for
<a href="http://www.steve.org.uk/Software/chronicle/">Chronicle</a>
which I think ended with the addition of chronicle-spooler
to the released files.
I initially suggested ignoring a post when its Date
is in the future, like
<a href="http://www.wordpress.org/">Wordpress</a>
does, but I think that wouldn't be backwards-compatible
and isn't as flexibile as it could be.
</p><p>
chronicle-spooler works by moving files from a spool dir
into a live dir.  I'd forgotten how much it confuses me
when files on a "static" site start moving themselves
around.  It means I have to merge before upload, which
isn't a big change, but still annoying.
</p><p>
So, I've added the following lines to chronicle to
skip entries with a Publish header in the future:-
</p><pre>
--- chronicle-2.7/bin/chronicle.orig	2008-05-15 10:13:55.000000000 +0100
+++ chronicle-2.7/bin/chronicle	2008-05-15 10:13:43.000000000 +0100
@@ -607,7 +607,8 @@
         #  Read the entry and store all the data away as a
         # hash element keyed upon the (unique) filename.
         #
-        $results{ $file } = readBlogEntry($file);
+        my $result =  readBlogEntry($file);
+        if ($result) { $results{ $file } = $result; }
     }
 
     #
@@ -1479,7 +1480,7 @@
     my $tags    = "";    # entry tags.
     my $body    = "";    # entry body.
     my $date    = "";    # entry date
-    my $publish = "";    # entry publish date - *ignored*

+    my $publish = "";    # entry publish date
 
     open( ENTRY, "&lt;", $filename ) or die "Failed to read $filename $!";
     while ( my $line = &lt;ENTRY&gt; )
@@ -1527,6 +1528,14 @@
     }
     close(ENTRY);
 
+    # MJR - embargo stuff until its publish date.
+    # Steve recommends using chronicle-spooler,
+    # but I want uploaded files to stay where I put them,
+    # else I get my local copy confused.
+    if (($publish ne "") && (str2time($publish) &gt; time())) {
+    	return 0;
+    }
+
     #
     #  Determine the input format to use.
     #
</pre><p>
I think that's compatible with chronicle-spooler, too...
</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:date>2008-05-15T09:52:52+00:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item rdf:about="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/No_Battles___Just_Stand_Firm_On_Best_Practice.html">
		<title>No Battles - Just Stand Firm On Best Practice</title>
		<link>http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/No_Battles___Just_Stand_Firm_On_Best_Practice.html</link>
		<description>
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;Here are three examples of rules that I think it&#39;s time to abandon. These particular examples are all about email.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html#quoting&quot;&gt;1/ Top Posting&lt;/a&gt;
[...]
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html#attachments&quot;&gt;2/ HTML Email&lt;/a&gt;
[...]
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://mjr.towers.org.uk/comp/list-mua.html&quot;&gt;3/ Reply-To On Mailing Lists&lt;/a&gt;
[...]
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
So, yes, the barbarians are at the gate. The lunatics have taken over the asylum. Good ideas have been crushed by the number of people who don&#39;t understand them. But there&#39;s no point in complaining about it. You just have to accept it and move on.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.dave.org.uk/2008/05/pointless-battles-for-geeks.html&quot;&gt;-- Pointless Battles For Geeks, By Dave Cross&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Unsurprisingly,
given the above links to my site,
I disagree with Dave Cross&#39;s conclusion,
but I do agree with two aspects: battling is
generally pointless and using hard rules
about these things is unnecessary.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
I have those pages on my website so that I can
point to them when their broken emails aren&#39;t
handled as expected.  I use some aspects of
them as scoring inputs in my mail filters.
I don&#39;t use them as rules and I try not to
complain about them too often.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Nevertheless, I still believe
sending properly-trimmed plain text emails
from a list-friendly email client is clearly
best practice, to be recommended when someone
asks why their email bad habits are causing
them problems.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<blockquote><p>"Here are three examples of rules that I think it's time to abandon. These particular examples are all about email.
</p><p>
<a href="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html#quoting">1/ Top Posting</a>
[...]
</p><p>
<a href="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html#attachments">2/ HTML Email</a>
[...]
</p><p>
<a href="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/comp/list-mua.html">3/ Reply-To On Mailing Lists</a>
[...]
</p><p>
So, yes, the barbarians are at the gate. The lunatics have taken over the asylum. Good ideas have been crushed by the number of people who don't understand them. But there's no point in complaining about it. You just have to accept it and move on."</p></blockquote><p>
<a href="http://blog.dave.org.uk/2008/05/pointless-battles-for-geeks.html">-- Pointless Battles For Geeks, By Dave Cross</a>
</p><p>
Unsurprisingly,
given the above links to my site,
I disagree with Dave Cross's conclusion,
but I do agree with two aspects: battling is
generally pointless and using hard rules
about these things is unnecessary.
</p><p>
I have those pages on my website so that I can
point to them when their broken emails aren't
handled as expected.  I use some aspects of
them as scoring inputs in my mail filters.
I don't use them as rules and I try not to
complain about them too often.
</p><p>
Nevertheless, I still believe
sending properly-trimmed plain text emails
from a list-friendly email client is clearly
best practice, to be recommended when someone
asks why their email bad habits are causing
them problems.
</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:date>2008-05-16T08:52:52+00:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item rdf:about="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/BBC_TV__Click__Free_beer_and_facebook_flaming.html">
		<title>BBC TV: Click: Free=beer and facebook-flaming</title>
		<link>http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/BBC_TV__Click__Free_beer_and_facebook_flaming.html</link>
		<description>
&lt;p&gt;
Free software finally gets significant coverage on BBC TV&#39;s Click show
this week, but I think it&#39;s very much Linux rather than GNU/Linux and
free cost rather than freedom.  They mentioned free security software
and even raised the possibility of trojans, but didn&#39;t mention how
free (as in freedom) software allows any random end-user to check or
have it checked.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Quite a missed opportunity!  However, Click has a regular letters
section, so watch it (times below), email click@bbc.co.uk
and see if we can get the free software view across.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
The letters section this week seemed to be flaming proprietary SaaS
social network site facebook for their pathetic default-permit
approach to security of user details.  I really think there&#39;s a role
for something like
&lt;a href=&quot;http://noserub.com&quot;&gt;noserub&lt;/a&gt;
in free software social networking.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/click&quot;&gt;Click-UK&lt;/a&gt;
 is shown on BBC News Channel Saturday 1130, Sunday
0430 and 1130, Monday 0030 and Sunday 0430 on BBC-1 (times BST)
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbcworld.com/click&quot;&gt;Click-World&lt;/a&gt;
is shown Thursday 19:30 GMT, Repeated Friday 09:30
and 12:30 (Asia Pacific only), Saturdays 06:30, Mondays 15:30,
Tuesdays 01:30 (not Asia Pacific, Middle East or South Asia) and 07:30 GMT
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Anyone else see this?
&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p>
Free software finally gets significant coverage on BBC TV's Click show
this week, but I think it's very much Linux rather than GNU/Linux and
free cost rather than freedom.  They mentioned free security software
and even raised the possibility of trojans, but didn't mention how
free (as in freedom) software allows any random end-user to check or
have it checked.
</p><p>
Quite a missed opportunity!  However, Click has a regular letters
section, so watch it (times below), email click@bbc.co.uk
and see if we can get the free software view across.
</p><p>
The letters section this week seemed to be flaming proprietary SaaS
social network site facebook for their pathetic default-permit
approach to security of user details.  I really think there's a role
for something like
<a href="http://noserub.com">noserub</a>
in free software social networking.
</p><p>
<a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/click">Click-UK</a>
 is shown on BBC News Channel Saturday 1130, Sunday
0430 and 1130, Monday 0030 and Sunday 0430 on BBC-1 (times BST)
</p><p>
<a href="http://www.bbcworld.com/click">Click-World</a>
is shown Thursday 19:30 GMT, Repeated Friday 09:30
and 12:30 (Asia Pacific only), Saturdays 06:30, Mondays 15:30,
Tuesdays 01:30 (not Asia Pacific, Middle East or South Asia) and 07:30 GMT
</p><p>
Anyone else see this?
</p>

 ]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:date>2008-05-16T17:15:36+00:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item rdf:about="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Updating_the_Accounts.html">
		<title>Updating the Accounts</title>
		<link>http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Updating_the_Accounts.html</link>
		<description>
&lt;p&gt;
I finally closed
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ttllp.co.uk/&quot;&gt;my cooperative&#39;s&lt;/a&gt;
annual accounts for the year to 5 April 2008
yesterday.
We wrote off one project (not bad for a year)
and now we can start on the annual reports.
For day-to-day entries, we&#39;re still using my simple scheme/web app called 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://mjr.towers.org.uk/comp/sqljournal/&quot;&gt;SQL-Journal&lt;/a&gt;
and I should make a new release
real soon now.  I&#39;ve added some features since 1.3 and there&#39;s a few more I want to add,
but I&#39;m no accountant, so it will remain simple
and stupid, but good enough for me.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bristolwireless.net/news/?p=385&quot;&gt;Bristol Wireless&#39;s accountant has written some comments on GNUcash&lt;/a&gt;
which is an interesting view: &quot;not quite there yet&quot; which could help finance software
developers.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Better searching is one thing I will add
to SQL-Journal some time,
but
it will probably never have features like
reporting (I either use an SQL-based
report package or export to a spreadsheet)
and I know it&#39;s no better at
handling VAT, mainly because TTLLP isn&#39;t
VAT-registered yet.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
I also spotted
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/serendipity/index.php?/archives/116-Finance-software-in-Emdebian.html&quot;&gt;Finance software in Emdebian, by Neil Williams&lt;/a&gt;
recently.  I wonder if the bursts of
accounting interest are connected to the
end of the financial year?
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p>
I finally closed
<a href="http://www.ttllp.co.uk/">my cooperative's</a>
annual accounts for the year to 5 April 2008
yesterday.
We wrote off one project (not bad for a year)
and now we can start on the annual reports.
For day-to-day entries, we're still using my simple scheme/web app called 
<a href="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/comp/sqljournal/">SQL-Journal</a>
and I should make a new release
real soon now.  I've added some features since 1.3 and there's a few more I want to add,
but I'm no accountant, so it will remain simple
and stupid, but good enough for me.
</p><p>
<a href="http://www.bristolwireless.net/news/?p=385">Bristol Wireless's accountant has written some comments on GNUcash</a>
which is an interesting view: "not quite there yet" which could help finance software
developers.
</p><p>
Better searching is one thing I will add
to SQL-Journal some time,
but
it will probably never have features like
reporting (I either use an SQL-based
report package or export to a spreadsheet)
and I know it's no better at
handling VAT, mainly because TTLLP isn't
VAT-registered yet.
</p><p>
I also spotted
<a href="http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/serendipity/index.php?/archives/116-Finance-software-in-Emdebian.html">Finance software in Emdebian, by Neil Williams</a>
recently.  I wonder if the bursts of
accounting interest are connected to the
end of the financial year?
</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:date>2008-05-22T08:52:23+00:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item rdf:about="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Silver_Surfer_s_Day_2008.html">
		<title>Silver Surfer&#39;s Day 2008</title>
		<link>http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Silver_Surfer_s_Day_2008.html</link>
		<description>
&lt;p&gt;
Today is
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.digitalunite.net/ssd/&quot;&gt;Silver Surfer&#39;s Day 2008,&lt;/a&gt;
intended to give a taste of the internet to
some of the nearly 10 million over-50s who aren&#39;t yet online.
There&#39;s
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.digitalunite.net/ssd/?page=search&quot;&gt;an SSD event finder&lt;/a&gt;
on the site of organisers Digital Unite.
(Thanks to
&lt;a href=&quot;http://swict.wordpress.com/2008/05/19/silver-surfers%e2%80%99-day-this-friday/&quot;&gt;SW ICT Champion&lt;/a&gt;
for the tip.)
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
I also spotted
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ofcom.org.uk/media/news/2008/05/nr_20080522&quot;&gt;Rural broadband households overtake urban for the first time&lt;/a&gt;
from Ofcom,
but I wonder whether
the Ofcom definition of broadband
is as broken as
&lt;a href=&quot;http://mjr.towers.org.uk/blog/2004-8.html#ofcommadness1103&quot;&gt;the Ofcom definition of digital television.&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p>
Today is
<a href="http://www.digitalunite.net/ssd/">Silver Surfer's Day 2008,</a>
intended to give a taste of the internet to
some of the nearly 10 million over-50s who aren't yet online.
There's
<a href="http://www.digitalunite.net/ssd/?page=search">an SSD event finder</a>
on the site of organisers Digital Unite.
(Thanks to
<a href="http://swict.wordpress.com/2008/05/19/silver-surfers%e2%80%99-day-this-friday/">SW ICT Champion</a>
for the tip.)
</p><p>
I also spotted
<a href="http://www.ofcom.org.uk/media/news/2008/05/nr_20080522">Rural broadband households overtake urban for the first time</a>
from Ofcom,
but I wonder whether
the Ofcom definition of broadband
is as broken as
<a href="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/blog/2004-8.html#ofcommadness1103">the Ofcom definition of digital television.</a>
</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:date>2008-05-23T08:54:38+00:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item rdf:about="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Update__Experts_Say_Ofcom_Wrong_About_Rural_Broadband.html">
		<title>Update: Experts Say Ofcom Wrong About Rural Broadband</title>
		<link>http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Update__Experts_Say_Ofcom_Wrong_About_Rural_Broadband.html</link>
		<description>
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Silver_Surfer_s_Day_2008.html&quot;&gt;Last Friday, I mentioned&lt;/a&gt;
Ofcom announcing that
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ofcom.org.uk/media/news/2008/05/nr_20080522&quot;&gt;Rural broadband households overtake urban for the first time&lt;/a&gt;
and wondered whether
the Ofcom definition of broadband
is as broken as
&lt;a href=&quot;http://mjr.towers.org.uk/blog/2004-8.html#ofcommadness1103&quot;&gt;the Ofcom definition of digital television.&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Of course it is.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Apprently, it ignores download speed,
alternative access points and lots of
other aspects.  See
&lt;a href=&quot;http://simonberry.ruralnet.org.uk/2008/05/22/rural-broadband-%e2%80%93-lies-damn-lies-and-statistics/&quot;&gt;Rural broadband - lies, damn lies and statistics&lt;/a&gt;
(hey, don&#39;t blame the numbers - blame those
doing the interpretation!),
&lt;a href=&quot;http://lifetorque.blogspot.com/2008/05/ofcom-still-out-of-touch-on-broadband.html&quot;&gt;Lifetorque: Ofcom still out of touch on broadband&lt;/a&gt;
and
&lt;a href=&quot;http://swict.wordpress.com/2008/05/23/its-broadband-jim-but-not-as-we-know-it/&quot;&gt;It&#39;s Broadband Jim - but not as we know it!&lt;/a&gt;
for some of the points and links to more.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Can we ever trust any of Ofcom&#39;s statistics?
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p>
<a href="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Silver_Surfer_s_Day_2008.html">Last Friday, I mentioned</a>
Ofcom announcing that
<a href="http://www.ofcom.org.uk/media/news/2008/05/nr_20080522">Rural broadband households overtake urban for the first time</a>
and wondered whether
the Ofcom definition of broadband
is as broken as
<a href="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/blog/2004-8.html#ofcommadness1103">the Ofcom definition of digital television.</a>
</p><p>
Of course it is.
</p><p>
Apprently, it ignores download speed,
alternative access points and lots of
other aspects.  See
<a href="http://simonberry.ruralnet.org.uk/2008/05/22/rural-broadband-%e2%80%93-lies-damn-lies-and-statistics/">Rural broadband - lies, damn lies and statistics</a>
(hey, don't blame the numbers - blame those
doing the interpretation!),
<a href="http://lifetorque.blogspot.com/2008/05/ofcom-still-out-of-touch-on-broadband.html">Lifetorque: Ofcom still out of touch on broadband</a>
and
<a href="http://swict.wordpress.com/2008/05/23/its-broadband-jim-but-not-as-we-know-it/">It's Broadband Jim - but not as we know it!</a>
for some of the points and links to more.
</p><p>
Can we ever trust any of Ofcom's statistics?
</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:date>2008-05-26T17:24:34+00:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item rdf:about="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Quick_Question__opticaljungle_com___publicdomainregistry_com_.html">
		<title>Quick Question: opticaljungle.com = publicdomainregistry.com?</title>
		<link>http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Quick_Question__opticaljungle_com___publicdomainregistry_com_.html</link>
		<description>
&lt;p&gt;
Are
opticaljungle.com and publicdomainregistry.com
the same people?
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Their addresses look identical but
their phone numbers are different.
Both appear to have some connections to directi.com.
Is there any way to check if they are
the same people?
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
I don&#39;t know how to verify US companies when they
appear not to want to be verified...
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.domaindetectives.net/reports/directi/directis_domains.php&quot;&gt;Domain Detectives thinks they&#39;re both directi&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p>
Are
opticaljungle.com and publicdomainregistry.com
the same people?
</p><p>
Their addresses look identical but
their phone numbers are different.
Both appear to have some connections to directi.com.
Is there any way to check if they are
the same people?
</p><p>
I don't know how to verify US companies when they
appear not to want to be verified...
<a href="http://www.domaindetectives.net/reports/directi/directis_domains.php">Domain Detectives thinks they're both directi</a>
</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:date>2008-05-28T12:21:26+00:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item rdf:about="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Told_You_So__Exhibitions_and_Spammer_Registrars.html">
		<title>Told You So: Exhibitions and Spammer Registrars</title>
		<link>http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Told_You_So__Exhibitions_and_Spammer_Registrars.html</link>
		<description>
&lt;p&gt;
I used to help staff more exhibition stands
than I do now.
Part of the reason I stopped was that few
free software people seem to appreciate the
basics of running a good exhibition stand
and I got bored of arguing that we should
give people space, avoid putting a counter
across the stand, keep notes of contacts made
and basic stuff like that.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
So, it was good to read
&lt;a href=&quot;http://networkingandreferrals.blogspot.com/2008/05/making-exhibition-of-yourself-exhibitor.html&quot;&gt;Connecting People: Making an exhibition of yourself - the exhibitor&lt;/a&gt;
and the linked
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ecademy.com/node.php?id=103601&quot;&gt;Business Startup Coach shares Exhibition &amp;amp; Trade show secrets&lt;/a&gt;
which repeat many points I&#39;ve made before.
Don&#39;t want to listen to me?  Listen to the
marketing experts.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Some time after noticing
&lt;a href=&quot;http://wdprs.internic.net/&quot;&gt;WDPRS&lt;/a&gt;,
I tried reporting
as much spam as possible for a while, to hosters
and registrars based on WHOIS details.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Some hosts and registrars were good at dealing with spam
(Yahoo and walla.net.il were exceptionally good)
many were bad (bresnan.net, registrationtek.com, publicdomainregistry.com (PDR), ait.com, omantel.co.om, ttnet.net.tr)
and some were ugly (Tucows/OpenSRS wrote back to say
they don&#39;t do anything about domains they register,
while ENom and Moniker never sent human answers).
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
So it&#39;s no surprise to see ENom, Moniker, PDR and AIT on
the list of
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.schwimmerlegal.com/2008/05/top_ten_worst_s.html&quot;&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;Top Ten Worst Spam Registrars Notified By ICANN&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
ultimately taken from
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.knujon.com/registrars/&quot;&gt;this report.&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p>
I used to help staff more exhibition stands
than I do now.
Part of the reason I stopped was that few
free software people seem to appreciate the
basics of running a good exhibition stand
and I got bored of arguing that we should
give people space, avoid putting a counter
across the stand, keep notes of contacts made
and basic stuff like that.
</p><p>
So, it was good to read
<a href="http://networkingandreferrals.blogspot.com/2008/05/making-exhibition-of-yourself-exhibitor.html">Connecting People: Making an exhibition of yourself - the exhibitor</a>
and the linked
<a href="http://www.ecademy.com/node.php?id=103601">Business Startup Coach shares Exhibition &amp; Trade show secrets</a>
which repeat many points I've made before.
Don't want to listen to me?  Listen to the
marketing experts.
</p><p>
Some time after noticing
<a href="http://wdprs.internic.net/">WDPRS</a>,
I tried reporting
as much spam as possible for a while, to hosters
and registrars based on WHOIS details.
</p><p>
Some hosts and registrars were good at dealing with spam
(Yahoo and walla.net.il were exceptionally good)
many were bad (bresnan.net, registrationtek.com, publicdomainregistry.com (PDR), ait.com, omantel.co.om, ttnet.net.tr)
and some were ugly (Tucows/OpenSRS wrote back to say
they don't do anything about domains they register,
while ENom and Moniker never sent human answers).
</p><p>
So it's no surprise to see ENom, Moniker, PDR and AIT on
the list of
<a href="http://www.schwimmerlegal.com/2008/05/top_ten_worst_s.html"></p><blockquote><p>"Top Ten Worst Spam Registrars Notified By ICANN"</a>
ultimately taken from
<a href="http://www.knujon.com/registrars/">this report.</a>
</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:date>2008-05-30T08:54:13+00:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item rdf:about="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Please_Tell_Me_How_To_Do_It.html">
		<title>Please Tell Me How To Do It</title>
		<link>http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Please_Tell_Me_How_To_Do_It.html</link>
		<description>
&lt;p class=&quot;leadimg&quot;&gt;
&lt;img src=&quot;http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/attachments/platform_empty.jpg&quot; width=&quot;120&quot; height=&quot;120&quot; alt=&quot;[Meeting Room]&quot; title=&quot;Empty Meeting Platform&quot; /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
(Guess I arrived early.)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Dear Reader,
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
I&#39;d like to read any opinions on these three:-
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
1. when I get new information about a story
I&#39;ve already written about, should I make it
a new blog post and/or add it to the old
post or something else?
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
For example, I&#39;ve got new links about the
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.informationweek.com/news/internet/security/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=208400289&quot;&gt;Yahoo&#39;s good anti-spam actions&lt;/a&gt;
which is sort-of linked to last week&#39;s
&lt;a href=&quot;http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Told_You_So__Exhibitions_and_Spammer_Registrars.html&quot;&gt;spammer registrar post.&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
2. what should I do with links to sites where
I&#39;ve commented?  Should I make a new feed like
&lt;a href=&quot;http://mjr.towers.org.uk/blog/bookmarks.html&quot;&gt;my bookmarks feed,&lt;/a&gt;
silently ignore them, or something else?
&lt;a href=&quot;http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/21_today__MJR_around_the_web___.html&quot;&gt;Last time I did a link post,&lt;/a&gt;
mildly irritated comments followed on
&lt;a href=&quot;http://planet.debian.net/&quot;&gt;one of the planets.&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
3. Tonight is my first full
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kewstoke.org/parish.htm&quot;&gt;Kewstoke village council&lt;/a&gt;
meeting.
Main (non-routine) topics include
Sand Road Lay-by, Crookes Lane Memorial Seat,
the newsletter,
replacing the gazebo on the village green,
coopting more councillors,
completing the Crookes Lane Footpath,
the 2007-08 accounts
and reviewing the Sand Bay Management Plan.
Any comments on any of those?
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p class="leadimg">
<img src="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/attachments/platform_empty.jpg" width="120" height="120" alt="[Meeting Room]" title="Empty Meeting Platform" /><br />
(Guess I arrived early.)
</p>
<p>
Dear Reader,
</p><p>
I'd like to read any opinions on these three:-
</p><p>
1. when I get new information about a story
I've already written about, should I make it
a new blog post and/or add it to the old
post or something else?
</p><p>
For example, I've got new links about the
<a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/internet/security/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=208400289">Yahoo's good anti-spam actions</a>
which is sort-of linked to last week's
<a href="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Told_You_So__Exhibitions_and_Spammer_Registrars.html">spammer registrar post.</a>
</p><p>
2. what should I do with links to sites where
I've commented?  Should I make a new feed like
<a href="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/blog/bookmarks.html">my bookmarks feed,</a>
silently ignore them, or something else?
<a href="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/21_today__MJR_around_the_web___.html">Last time I did a link post,</a>
mildly irritated comments followed on
<a href="http://planet.debian.net/">one of the planets.</a>
</p><p>
3. Tonight is my first full
<a href="http://www.kewstoke.org/parish.htm">Kewstoke village council</a>
meeting.
Main (non-routine) topics include
Sand Road Lay-by, Crookes Lane Memorial Seat,
the newsletter,
replacing the gazebo on the village green,
coopting more councillors,
completing the Crookes Lane Footpath,
the 2007-08 accounts
and reviewing the Sand Bay Management Plan.
Any comments on any of those?
</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:date>2008-06-02T10:47:09+00:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item rdf:about="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/BBC_website__TV_and_Technology.html">
		<title>BBC website, TV and Technology</title>
		<link>http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/BBC_website__TV_and_Technology.html</link>
		<description>
&lt;p class=&quot;leadimg&quot;&gt;
&lt;img src=&quot;http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/attachments/satdish_sm.jpg&quot; width=&quot;120&quot; height=&quot;120&quot; alt=&quot;[Dish]&quot; title=&quot;Dish&quot; /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
(How I get TV)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The British Broadcasting Corporation,
the largest UK public service broadcaster,
is seen as a slow lumbering beast and a bit
clueless about technology,
as you can see from
&lt;a href=&quot;http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/BBC_TV__Click__Free_beer_and_facebook_flaming.html#c&quot;&gt;the comment when I wrote about Click: Free=beer and facebook-flaming&lt;/a&gt;
recently.  I think that&#39;s a pretty typical
view.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
For example,
the BBC has recently helped to launch
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.freesat.co.uk/&quot;&gt;Freesat&lt;/a&gt;
which is good in some ways (free-to-air and
maybe more standards-based than Sky) but
still publishes half-truths like
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;Installing a satellite dish is a job for professionals&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;
(On balance, it&#39;s no harder than installing
most TV aerials, in my opinion, but
remember you get no warranty on DIY.)
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
It&#39;s pretty much the same situation online,
which is why stories like
&lt;a href=&quot;http://davepress.net/2008/06/02/the-bbc-and-innovation/&quot;&gt;The BBC and innovation [DavePress]&lt;/a&gt;
and
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/good-news-for-websites-bbc-told-to-link-out-more/&quot;&gt;Good news for websites - BBC told to link out more!&lt;/a&gt;
continue to be news, nearly 12 years after
the BBC&#39;s website launched.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://web.archive.org/web/19961029213728/http://www.bbcnc.org.uk/&quot;&gt;(Source)&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
One of the few areas where BBC triumphs
is probably news-gathering, picking up
stories that are unpopular
with both business and government, like
&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7431336.stm&quot;&gt;BBC NEWS: Towns triumph in broadband tests&lt;/a&gt;
which follows the
&lt;a href=&quot;http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Update__Experts_Say_Ofcom_Wrong_About_Rural_Broadband.html&quot;&gt;Experts Say Ofcom Wrong About Rural Broadband&lt;/a&gt;
storm online.  I recently helped
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.doonofmay.org/blog/?p=21&quot;&gt;The Doon of May team look into internet connectivity&lt;/a&gt;
and I was surprised how bad it was in their
location: a bit
of attention from BBC News is most welcome.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
If you&#39;d like to try receiving the BBC - or
some other national broadcasters in Europe -
by satellite, I&#39;m currently taking
&lt;a href=&quot;http://cyclingfans.net/satellite/2008/questions-about-cycling-on-satellite&quot;&gt;Questions About Cycling on Satellite&lt;/a&gt;
over on my Cycling Fans blog.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p class="leadimg">
<img src="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/attachments/satdish_sm.jpg" width="120" height="120" alt="[Dish]" title="Dish" /><br />
(How I get TV)
</p>
<p>
The British Broadcasting Corporation,
the largest UK public service broadcaster,
is seen as a slow lumbering beast and a bit
clueless about technology,
as you can see from
<a href="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/BBC_TV__Click__Free_beer_and_facebook_flaming.html#c">the comment when I wrote about Click: Free=beer and facebook-flaming</a>
recently.  I think that's a pretty typical
view.
</p><p>
For example,
the BBC has recently helped to launch
<a href="http://www.freesat.co.uk/">Freesat</a>
which is good in some ways (free-to-air and
maybe more standards-based than Sky) but
still publishes half-truths like
</p><blockquote><p>"Installing a satellite dish is a job for professionals"</p></blockquote><p>
(On balance, it's no harder than installing
most TV aerials, in my opinion, but
remember you get no warranty on DIY.)
</p><p>
It's pretty much the same situation online,
which is why stories like
<a href="http://davepress.net/2008/06/02/the-bbc-and-innovation/">The BBC and innovation [DavePress]</a>
and
<a href="http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/good-news-for-websites-bbc-told-to-link-out-more/">Good news for websites - BBC told to link out more!</a>
continue to be news, nearly 12 years after
the BBC's website launched.
<a href="http://web.archive.org/web/19961029213728/http://www.bbcnc.org.uk/">(Source)</a>
</p><p>
One of the few areas where BBC triumphs
is probably news-gathering, picking up
stories that are unpopular
with both business and government, like
<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7431336.stm">BBC NEWS: Towns triumph in broadband tests</a>
which follows the
<a href="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Update__Experts_Say_Ofcom_Wrong_About_Rural_Broadband.html">Experts Say Ofcom Wrong About Rural Broadband</a>
storm online.  I recently helped
<a href="http://www.doonofmay.org/blog/?p=21">The Doon of May team look into internet connectivity</a>
and I was surprised how bad it was in their
location: a bit
of attention from BBC News is most welcome.
</p><p>
If you'd like to try receiving the BBC - or
some other national broadcasters in Europe -
by satellite, I'm currently taking
<a href="http://cyclingfans.net/satellite/2008/questions-about-cycling-on-satellite">Questions About Cycling on Satellite</a>
over on my Cycling Fans blog.
</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:date>2008-06-03T10:43:29+00:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item rdf:about="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Hosting_Blogs_on_Multiple_Servers.html">
		<title>Hosting Blogs on Multiple Servers</title>
		<link>http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Hosting_Blogs_on_Multiple_Servers.html</link>
		<description>
&lt;p class=&quot;leadimg&quot;&gt;
&lt;img src=&quot;http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/attachments/mastsm.jpg&quot; width=&quot;120&quot; height=&quot;120&quot; alt=&quot;[Mast]&quot; title=&quot;Mast&quot; /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
(Is this a network?)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.buzzinfly.co.uk/&quot;&gt;Terry Lane&lt;/a&gt;
asked:
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;Do you know of any reason why someone would suggest we consider placing blogs on
more than one server?
I think his main concern would be related to SEO and -
I&#39;m assuming here - Google.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;
There are some small reasons, mainly about
various sorts of reliability: what if the server catches
fire, what if
someone filters out adverts from the server, what if the server gets
labelled as a spammer or splogger, and so on...
but I believe they&#39;re outweighed by ease of management and
having all your site on one server.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
If the search engines label your IP address as a
spammer, you can get another IP address as a short-term fix, but in
general, the search engines are always a major threat to a blog-based business.
If they label one server as a spammer, I think it would
take the guys at google or whatever
about 0.1 seconds to spot the link to another
server.
The best tactic is to avoid looking like a spam
source in the first place...
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
I guess if you&#39;re hosting several blogs
on shared servers, like I do,
splitting your blogs across several servers is a good idea for those reasons, which is part of why I do it...
In any case,
make sure you download backups in case your hosting goes like this:-
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.webmasterworld.com/webmaster/3663978.htm&quot;&gt;The Planet (EV1) Data Center Catches Fire - 9000 Servers Offline&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
If a blog becomes really popular,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dmoz.org/Computers/Software/Internet/Site_Management/&quot;&gt;the usual tactics of mirroring and distributed load-balanced hosting&lt;/a&gt;
can be used, but I don&#39;t think that was the question here.
Even after all those,
I can&#39;t think of any real killer reasons to split a blog
across multiple servers
if you&#39;re on your own dedicated server already.
Have I missed a reason?
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p class="leadimg">
<img src="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/attachments/mastsm.jpg" width="120" height="120" alt="[Mast]" title="Mast" /><br />
(Is this a network?)
</p>
<p>
<a href="http://www.buzzinfly.co.uk/">Terry Lane</a>
asked:
</p><blockquote><p>"Do you know of any reason why someone would suggest we consider placing blogs on
more than one server?
I think his main concern would be related to SEO and -
I'm assuming here - Google."</p></blockquote><p>
There are some small reasons, mainly about
various sorts of reliability: what if the server catches
fire, what if
someone filters out adverts from the server, what if the server gets
labelled as a spammer or splogger, and so on...
but I believe they're outweighed by ease of management and
having all your site on one server.
</p><p>
If the search engines label your IP address as a
spammer, you can get another IP address as a short-term fix, but in
general, the search engines are always a major threat to a blog-based business.
If they label one server as a spammer, I think it would
take the guys at google or whatever
about 0.1 seconds to spot the link to another
server.
The best tactic is to avoid looking like a spam
source in the first place...
</p><p>
I guess if you're hosting several blogs
on shared servers, like I do,
splitting your blogs across several servers is a good idea for those reasons, which is part of why I do it...
In any case,
make sure you download backups in case your hosting goes like this:-
<a href="http://www.webmasterworld.com/webmaster/3663978.htm">The Planet (EV1) Data Center Catches Fire - 9000 Servers Offline</a>
</p><p>
If a blog becomes really popular,
<a href="http://www.dmoz.org/Computers/Software/Internet/Site_Management/">the usual tactics of mirroring and distributed load-balanced hosting</a>
can be used, but I don't think that was the question here.
Even after all those,
I can't think of any real killer reasons to split a blog
across multiple servers
if you're on your own dedicated server already.
Have I missed a reason?
</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:date>2008-06-04T15:09:03+00:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item rdf:about="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Bridgwater_College_Computing_Advisory_Panel.html">
		<title>Bridgwater College Computing Advisory Panel</title>
		<link>http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Bridgwater_College_Computing_Advisory_Panel.html</link>
		<description>
&lt;p&gt;
Probably due to some mistake or just an
excess of randomness in the world,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ttllp.co.uk&quot;&gt;our webmaster cooperative&lt;/a&gt;
has been invited to
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bridgwater.ac.uk/&quot;&gt;Bridgwater College&#39;s&lt;/a&gt;
Computing Advisory Panel meeting next week
and it looks like I&#39;m going.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
The interesting agenda items are:-
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
5. Current Curriculum offer
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
6. Computing and ICT Sector Developments - Education and Training
- ICT Diplomas
- Distance Learning
- Specialist training / apprenticeships
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
7. Meeting Employer Needs
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
I&#39;ve asked some
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.software.coop/info/other.html&quot;&gt;nearby cooperatives and social enterprises&lt;/a&gt;
for comments and I&#39;ll probably highlight things like
&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.zdnet.co.uk/software/0,1000000121,39419829,00.htm&quot;&gt;Linux opens London&#39;s Oyster&lt;/a&gt;
and
&lt;a href=&quot;http://resources.zdnet.co.uk/articles/casestudy/0,1000001994,39303425,00.htm&quot;&gt;Specsavers sees clear benefits in open source&lt;/a&gt;
when arguing for more free software use
and emphasising &quot;worker needs&quot; rather than
&quot;employer needs&quot;,
but please send me any other suggestions
in a comment on this blog post or an email.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p>
Probably due to some mistake or just an
excess of randomness in the world,
<a href="http://www.ttllp.co.uk">our webmaster cooperative</a>
has been invited to
<a href="http://www.bridgwater.ac.uk/">Bridgwater College's</a>
Computing Advisory Panel meeting next week
and it looks like I'm going.
</p><p>
The interesting agenda items are:-
</p><p>
5. Current Curriculum offer
</p><p>
6. Computing and ICT Sector Developments - Education and Training
- ICT Diplomas
- Distance Learning
- Specialist training / apprenticeships
</p><p>
7. Meeting Employer Needs
</p><p>
I've asked some
<a href="http://www.software.coop/info/other.html">nearby cooperatives and social enterprises</a>
for comments and I'll probably highlight things like
<a href="http://news.zdnet.co.uk/software/0,1000000121,39419829,00.htm">Linux opens London's Oyster</a>
and
<a href="http://resources.zdnet.co.uk/articles/casestudy/0,1000001994,39303425,00.htm">Specsavers sees clear benefits in open source</a>
when arguing for more free software use
and emphasising "worker needs" rather than
"employer needs",
but please send me any other suggestions
in a comment on this blog post or an email.
</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:date>2008-06-07T08:52:34+00:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item rdf:about="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Fixing_things_the_wrong_way.html">
		<title>Fixing things the wrong way</title>
		<link>http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Fixing_things_the_wrong_way.html</link>
		<description>
&lt;p&gt;
For some reason (maybe related to upgrading
openssl recently), my Jabber client became
unstable.  Instead of fixing it the right
way, I simply upgraded to Emacs 22.2 (which
also got me the emacsclient --eval option
mentioned on this blog previously).
It still wouldn&#39;t make SSL connections at
first, but a quick application of
&lt;a href=&quot;http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=87od88hl58.fsf%40blackbird.nest.zamazal.org&quot;&gt;[jabber.el] Anybody using emacs-jabber with Emacs 22.2?&lt;/a&gt;
fixed it.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
That&#39;s the wrong way to fix that bug, but
it&#39;s not quite as wrong as
misusing computers
to try to fix copyright infringement.
MediaDefender denial-of-service attacked
a TV production company, as described in
&lt;a href=&quot;http://revision3.com/blog/2008/05/29/inside-the-attack-that-crippled-revision3&quot;&gt;Inside the Attack that Crippled Revision3 on May 29th, 2008 at 07:49 am by Jim Louderback in Polemics&lt;/a&gt;
MediaDefender or MediaDestroyer?
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
That&#39;s the wrong way to fix that bug, but
it&#39;s not quite as wrong as
making treaties mostly in secret, under NDAs
to try to evade local copyright law-makers.
The US government, the European Commission, Japan, Switzerland, Australia and a handful of other countries are meeting in a secret negotiation on a new treaty
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;that undermines civil rights and privacy, and which many say will change the substantive rights the public has to use copyrighted works or inventions.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Read more at 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://actonacta.org/&quot;&gt;Act On ACTA&lt;/a&gt;
and then contact your law-making
representatives.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p>
For some reason (maybe related to upgrading
openssl recently), my Jabber client became
unstable.  Instead of fixing it the right
way, I simply upgraded to Emacs 22.2 (which
also got me the emacsclient --eval option
mentioned on this blog previously).
It still wouldn't make SSL connections at
first, but a quick application of
<a href="http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=87od88hl58.fsf%40blackbird.nest.zamazal.org">[jabber.el] Anybody using emacs-jabber with Emacs 22.2?</a>
fixed it.
</p><p>
That's the wrong way to fix that bug, but
it's not quite as wrong as
misusing computers
to try to fix copyright infringement.
MediaDefender denial-of-service attacked
a TV production company, as described in
<a href="http://revision3.com/blog/2008/05/29/inside-the-attack-that-crippled-revision3">Inside the Attack that Crippled Revision3 on May 29th, 2008 at 07:49 am by Jim Louderback in Polemics</a>
MediaDefender or MediaDestroyer?
</p><p>
That's the wrong way to fix that bug, but
it's not quite as wrong as
making treaties mostly in secret, under NDAs
to try to evade local copyright law-makers.
The US government, the European Commission, Japan, Switzerland, Australia and a handful of other countries are meeting in a secret negotiation on a new treaty
</p><blockquote><p>"that undermines civil rights and privacy, and which many say will change the substantive rights the public has to use copyrighted works or inventions."</p></blockquote><p>
Read more at 
<a href="http://actonacta.org/">Act On ACTA</a>
and then contact your law-making
representatives.
</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:date>2008-06-09T13:14:56+00:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item rdf:about="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Online_shopping.html">
		<title>Online shopping</title>
		<link>http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Online_shopping.html</link>
		<description>
&lt;p&gt;
I maintain a number of web shops for
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ttllp.co.uk/&quot;&gt;our webmaster cooperative&lt;/a&gt;
and one of our main challenges is to
encourage people who put things into
their basket/cart to actually buy them.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.grahamjones.co.uk/2008/06/how-to-avoid-shopping-cart-abandonment.htm&quot;&gt;How to avoid shopping cart abandonment by Graham Jones&lt;/a&gt;
makes some points that I&#39;ve identified as
possible reasons for people not buying
in the past: comparisons,
robots and not trusting the site enough to
give payment details.
There&#39;s not much we can do about robots or
people comparison-shopping at a technical
level, but
we try to build some trust by publishing
the shop owner&#39;s geographic address and
telephone number (which I think is required
by law in England for most web shops now),
making sure the SSL certificate and domain
registration details are correct,
using reputable payment
providers and being clear about
delivery charges and terms.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
The point about the
slickness of the checkout process is a good
one and one that we&#39;ve only recently started
to work on.  We&#39;ve had pretty good
results from making the checkout slicker
on one site.  It looks like two-thirds of
people who click the checkout button now
continue to buy, putting it comfortably ahead of
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.coremetrics.co.uk/solutions/benchmarking.php&quot;&gt;current UK averages&lt;/a&gt;
but I need to tweak our stats calculator to
make the report directly comparable.
Nevertheless, I think those improvements
will be added to our other shops as soon as
possible.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
I share Graham&#39;s low opinion of the oft-quoted
Amazon.
We&#39;ve also been looking at other web shop
software besides
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oscommerce.com/&quot;&gt;OSCommerce&lt;/a&gt;
for a new project, so now would be
a good time to change to something new if
it improves the checkout a lot.
We&#39;ve made OSCommerce&#39;s checkout a lot
smoother, but it&#39;s still essentially OSC.
Is there a good checkout which you&#39;d want
to use as an example?
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
The other challenge is getting visitors onto
the site in the first place.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/how-to-build-links/&quot;&gt;How To Build Links By Patrick Altoft&lt;/a&gt;
explains the basics as well as I&#39;ve seen
recently.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p>
I maintain a number of web shops for
<a href="http://www.ttllp.co.uk/">our webmaster cooperative</a>
and one of our main challenges is to
encourage people who put things into
their basket/cart to actually buy them.
</p><p>
<a href="http://www.grahamjones.co.uk/2008/06/how-to-avoid-shopping-cart-abandonment.htm">How to avoid shopping cart abandonment by Graham Jones</a>
makes some points that I've identified as
possible reasons for people not buying
in the past: comparisons,
robots and not trusting the site enough to
give payment details.
There's not much we can do about robots or
people comparison-shopping at a technical
level, but
we try to build some trust by publishing
the shop owner's geographic address and
telephone number (which I think is required
by law in England for most web shops now),
making sure the SSL certificate and domain
registration details are correct,
using reputable payment
providers and being clear about
delivery charges and terms.
</p><p>
The point about the
slickness of the checkout process is a good
one and one that we've only recently started
to work on.  We've had pretty good
results from making the checkout slicker
on one site.  It looks like two-thirds of
people who click the checkout button now
continue to buy, putting it comfortably ahead of
<a href="http://www.coremetrics.co.uk/solutions/benchmarking.php">current UK averages</a>
but I need to tweak our stats calculator to
make the report directly comparable.
Nevertheless, I think those improvements
will be added to our other shops as soon as
possible.
</p><p>
I share Graham's low opinion of the oft-quoted
Amazon.
We've also been looking at other web shop
software besides
<a href="http://www.oscommerce.com/">OSCommerce</a>
for a new project, so now would be
a good time to change to something new if
it improves the checkout a lot.
We've made OSCommerce's checkout a lot
smoother, but it's still essentially OSC.
Is there a good checkout which you'd want
to use as an example?
</p><p>
The other challenge is getting visitors onto
the site in the first place.
<a href="http://www.blogstorm.co.uk/how-to-build-links/">How To Build Links By Patrick Altoft</a>
explains the basics as well as I've seen
recently.
</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:date>2008-06-10T11:48:38+00:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item rdf:about="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Warning_for_Webmasters__Friday_13th_ahoy_.html">
		<title>Warning for Webmasters: Friday 13th ahoy!</title>
		<link>http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Warning_for_Webmasters__Friday_13th_ahoy_.html</link>
		<description>
&lt;p&gt;
Personally, I like Friday 13th.
It&#39;s usually been
pretty good for me.  But for this one,
I won&#39;t be surprised if computer abusers
are planning some big attack tomorrow.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
I&#39;ve just spent a big chunk of my day
upgrading and securing some of the websites
that
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ttllp.co.uk/&quot;&gt;our free software cooperative&lt;/a&gt;
supports for a customer.
The number of attacks in the access logs is
surprising - and I&#39;ve been fixing other
people&#39;s cracked servers for over a decade.
It makes me wonder if someone is finding and
recruiting exploitable systems for tomorrow.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
If you have a website, please check that
any web applications on it are installed
correctly and the latest secure versions.
I&#39;ve been seeing
a lot of attack attempts for
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.joomla.org/&quot;&gt;Joomla&lt;/a&gt;
and
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wordpress.org/&quot;&gt;WordPress&lt;/a&gt;
in particular, even on sites which don&#39;t
run them.  That says something bad about
either the success rate of attacks for them,
or the stupidity of their attackers.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
In our case today, the damage seems to have
been minimal (touch wood!),
with the customer merely being
banned from some networks for a while.
It could be so much worse, like this
BBC News report about Cotton Traders
&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7446871.stm&quot;&gt;Card details stolen in web hack&lt;/a&gt;
(which is part of why I suggest small online
shops avoid storing credit card details on
their site - leave it to the payment gateway).
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Finally, there are some new scams like
&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7448187.stm&quot;&gt;Conmen abuse web address checks&lt;/a&gt;
on the horizon for online shops, so make
sure you&#39;ve got your 3D-Secure rules set
correctly by now and be cautious about
sending goods before you&#39;re sure you&#39;ve got
the money.  I think all web card payment
systems are a risk, so please
try to limit your risk.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Update:&lt;/strong&gt;
If you do get attacked, try to help track
the attackers down so we can get other results
like the
&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7451268.stm&quot;&gt;Jail sentence for botnet creator.&lt;/a&gt;
I wish our governments would concentrate on
toughening up blatent computer misuse law
and stop
&lt;a href=&quot;http://actonacta.org/?p=9&quot;&gt;tightening copyright law in secret.&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p>
Personally, I like Friday 13th.
It's usually been
pretty good for me.  But for this one,
I won't be surprised if computer abusers
are planning some big attack tomorrow.
</p><p>
I've just spent a big chunk of my day
upgrading and securing some of the websites
that
<a href="http://www.ttllp.co.uk/">our free software cooperative</a>
supports for a customer.
The number of attacks in the access logs is
surprising - and I've been fixing other
people's cracked servers for over a decade.
It makes me wonder if someone is finding and
recruiting exploitable systems for tomorrow.
</p><p>
If you have a website, please check that
any web applications on it are installed
correctly and the latest secure versions.
I've been seeing
a lot of attack attempts for
<a href="http://www.joomla.org/">Joomla</a>
and
<a href="http://www.wordpress.org/">WordPress</a>
in particular, even on sites which don't
run them.  That says something bad about
either the success rate of attacks for them,
or the stupidity of their attackers.
</p><p>
In our case today, the damage seems to have
been minimal (touch wood!),
with the customer merely being
banned from some networks for a while.
It could be so much worse, like this
BBC News report about Cotton Traders
<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7446871.stm">Card details stolen in web hack</a>
(which is part of why I suggest small online
shops avoid storing credit card details on
their site - leave it to the payment gateway).
</p><p>
Finally, there are some new scams like
<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7448187.stm">Conmen abuse web address checks</a>
on the horizon for online shops, so make
sure you've got your 3D-Secure rules set
correctly by now and be cautious about
sending goods before you're sure you've got
the money.  I think all web card payment
systems are a risk, so please
try to limit your risk.
</p><p>
<strong>Update:</strong>
If you do get attacked, try to help track
the attackers down so we can get other results
like the
<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7451268.stm">Jail sentence for botnet creator.</a>
I wish our governments would concentrate on
toughening up blatent computer misuse law
and stop
<a href="http://actonacta.org/?p=9">tightening copyright law in secret.</a>
</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:date>2008-06-12T16:18:11+00:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item rdf:about="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Forthcoming__and_past__Events_News__LUGoG__BikeWeek__HacktionLab__SPI.html">
		<title>Forthcoming (and past) Events News: LUGoG, BikeWeek, HacktionLab, SPI</title>
		<link>http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Forthcoming__and_past__Events_News__LUGoG__BikeWeek__HacktionLab__SPI.html</link>
		<description>
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lugog.org.uk/&quot;&gt;LUG of Glastonbury&lt;/a&gt;
meets at
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.torleisure.com/&quot;&gt;Tor Leisure&lt;/a&gt;
in Glastonbury at 7pm tonight (Monday).
It will be a general planning meeting, maybe with some GPG-key-signing
and other tasks.  If you want the LUG to show you something in
particular, this will be a good event to attend.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
This week is
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bikeweek.org.uk/&quot;&gt;BikeWeek 2008&lt;/a&gt;
and there&#39;s
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bikeweek.org.uk/event_search.php?pagemode=display&amp;amp;event_id=548&quot;&gt;a free cyclists breakfast&lt;/a&gt;
at the Victorian Cafe on the Weston-super-Mare seafront about 8am Wednesday morning.
For events in other areas,
stick a partial postcode into
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bikeweek.org.uk/event_search.php&quot;&gt;the BikeWeek event search.&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.doonofmay.org/blog/?p=24&quot;&gt;Someone from The Doon Of May was at Hacktionlab 2008 @ Highbury Farm&lt;/a&gt;
this last weekend, as were
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bristolwireless.net/news/?p=393&quot;&gt;Bristol Wireless, who were running the wifi.&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
I&#39;ve not seen an official announcement, but
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spi-inc.org/corporate/meetings&quot;&gt;SPI&#39;s board meeting&lt;/a&gt;
will be on Wednesday at 8pm UK time (1900 UTC),
according to
&lt;a href=&quot;http://lists.spi-inc.org/pipermail/spi-general/2008-May/002574.html&quot;&gt;my last meeting report.&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
I&#39;ve heard through
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bristol.lug.org.uk/&quot;&gt;BBLUG&lt;/a&gt;
that the notorious Shevek is co-organising an event called &quot;An Adventure in Technology&quot;
at Trinity Community Arts in Bristol on 28 June 2008.
It&#39;s a
follow-up event to the 2003 Bristol Linux
and will be an all-inclusive event where everybody is encouraged to
bring something along, talk about it, swap ideas, and build things on
site. It doesn&#39;t have to be Linux-based, but a lot of things will be.
The event web site is
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techadventure.org/&quot;&gt;http://www.techadventure.org/&lt;/a&gt;
and you should post there if you have an idea or want to run a
session. There will also be a list for people who decide on the day
that they want to give a talk.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p>
<a href="http://www.lugog.org.uk/">LUG of Glastonbury</a>
meets at
<a href="http://www.torleisure.com/">Tor Leisure</a>
in Glastonbury at 7pm tonight (Monday).
It will be a general planning meeting, maybe with some GPG-key-signing
and other tasks.  If you want the LUG to show you something in
particular, this will be a good event to attend.
</p><p>
This week is
<a href="http://www.bikeweek.org.uk/">BikeWeek 2008</a>
and there's
<a href="http://www.bikeweek.org.uk/event_search.php?pagemode=display&amp;event_id=548">a free cyclists breakfast</a>
at the Victorian Cafe on the Weston-super-Mare seafront about 8am Wednesday morning.
For events in other areas,
stick a partial postcode into
<a href="http://www.bikeweek.org.uk/event_search.php">the BikeWeek event search.</a>
</p><p>
<a href="http://www.doonofmay.org/blog/?p=24">Someone from The Doon Of May was at Hacktionlab 2008 @ Highbury Farm</a>
this last weekend, as were
<a href="http://www.bristolwireless.net/news/?p=393">Bristol Wireless, who were running the wifi.</a>
</p><p>
I've not seen an official announcement, but
<a href="http://www.spi-inc.org/corporate/meetings">SPI's board meeting</a>
will be on Wednesday at 8pm UK time (1900 UTC),
according to
<a href="http://lists.spi-inc.org/pipermail/spi-general/2008-May/002574.html">my last meeting report.</a>
</p><p>
I've heard through
<a href="http://www.bristol.lug.org.uk/">BBLUG</a>
that the notorious Shevek is co-organising an event called "An Adventure in Technology"
at Trinity Community Arts in Bristol on 28 June 2008.
It's a
follow-up event to the 2003 Bristol Linux
and will be an all-inclusive event where everybody is encouraged to
bring something along, talk about it, swap ideas, and build things on
site. It doesn't have to be Linux-based, but a lot of things will be.
The event web site is
<a href="http://www.techadventure.org/">http://www.techadventure.org/</a>
and you should post there if you have an idea or want to run a
session. There will also be a list for people who decide on the day
that they want to give a talk.
</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:date>2008-06-16T15:05:41+00:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item rdf:about="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/7_Reasons_Why_Firefox_3_Download_Day_Sucks.html">
		<title>7 Reasons Why Firefox 3 Download Day Sucks</title>
		<link>http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/7_Reasons_Why_Firefox_3_Download_Day_Sucks.html</link>
		<description>
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spreadfirefox.com/en-US/worldrecord&quot; &gt;&lt;img alt=&quot;Download Day 2008&quot; title=&quot;Download Day 2008&quot; src=&quot;http://www.spreadfirefox.com/sites/all/themes/spreadfirefox_RCS/images/download-day/buttons/en-US/180x150_02.png&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,91221-1319341,00.html&quot;&gt;It&#39;s&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7457503.stm&quot;&gt;every&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newsnow.co.uk/h/Breaking+News/Firefox+3.0+Launch&quot;&gt;where&lt;/a&gt;
on TV and in print, even
&lt;a href=&quot;http://raporto.info/node/4&quot;&gt;in Esperanto&lt;/a&gt;,
which
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all.html&quot;&gt;doesn&#39;t even have an official translation&lt;/a&gt;
- only
&lt;a href=&quot;http://tradukado.esperanto.org.uy/&quot;&gt;a third-party add-on Esperanto language pack&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;It was &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.web2learning.net/archives/1804&quot;&gt;late even for the US&lt;/a&gt;
and after most of Europe finished
work AFAIK.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;There&#39;s no official &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bittorrent.org/introduction.html&quot;&gt;bittorrent&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;There&#39;s no link to
&lt;a href=&quot;http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/3.0/source/&quot;&gt;the source code&lt;/a&gt;
from
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/?p=downloadday&quot;&gt;the main download page&lt;/a&gt;
as far as I can tell.
It may be mostly free software, but it feels
like MozCorp don&#39;t want pesky users
changing things.
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;It brings
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/wa-ffox3/?ca=dgr-lnxw04wa-ffox3&amp;amp;S_TACT=105AGX59&amp;amp;S_CMP=GRsitelnxw04&quot;&gt;more changes for webmasters&lt;/a&gt;
(which is another reason I code to standards whenever possible, but I bet some of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ttllp.co.uk/&quot;&gt;the free software web applications we use&lt;/a&gt; will need upgrades).&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;It might be the &lt;a href=&quot;http://np237.livejournal.com/18484.html&quot;&gt;&quot;most stupid world record ever&quot;&lt;/a&gt;
(or at least &lt;a href=&quot;http://glandium.org/blog/?p=198&quot;&gt;useless&lt;/a&gt;)
and comes just as some browsers move away
from the Gecko engine.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;...and all this irritation
came before I&#39;ve even built
and installed the damn thing!&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Seriously: the browser looks like
a big improvement from Firefox 2, but
there are so many niggles with
this download day idea...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p><a href="http://www.spreadfirefox.com/en-US/worldrecord" ><img alt="Download Day 2008" title="Download Day 2008" src="http://www.spreadfirefox.com/sites/all/themes/spreadfirefox_RCS/images/download-day/buttons/en-US/180x150_02.png" /></a></p>
<ol>
<li><a href="http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,91221-1319341,00.html">It's</a>
<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7457503.stm">every</a>
<a href="http://www.newsnow.co.uk/h/Breaking+News/Firefox+3.0+Launch">where</a>
on TV and in print, even
<a href="http://raporto.info/node/4">in Esperanto</a>,
which
<a href="http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all.html">doesn't even have an official translation</a>
- only
<a href="http://tradukado.esperanto.org.uy/">a third-party add-on Esperanto language pack</a>.
</li>
<li>It was <a href="http://www.web2learning.net/archives/1804">late even for the US</a>
and after most of Europe finished
work AFAIK.</li>
<li>There's no official <a href="http://www.bittorrent.org/introduction.html">bittorrent</a>.</li>
<li>There's no link to
<a href="http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/3.0/source/">the source code</a>
from
<a href="http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/?p=downloadday">the main download page</a>
as far as I can tell.
It may be mostly free software, but it feels
like MozCorp don't want pesky users
changing things.
</li>
<li>It brings
<a href="http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/wa-ffox3/?ca=dgr-lnxw04wa-ffox3&amp;S_TACT=105AGX59&amp;S_CMP=GRsitelnxw04">more changes for webmasters</a>
(which is another reason I code to standards whenever possible, but I bet some of <a href="http://www.ttllp.co.uk/">the free software web applications we use</a> will need upgrades).</li>
<li>It might be the <a href="http://np237.livejournal.com/18484.html">"most stupid world record ever"</a>
(or at least <a href="http://glandium.org/blog/?p=198">useless</a>)
and comes just as some browsers move away
from the Gecko engine.</li>
<li>...and all this irritation
came before I've even built
and installed the damn thing!</li>
</ol>
<p>Seriously: the browser looks like
a big improvement from Firefox 2, but
there are so many niggles with
this download day idea...</p> ]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:date>2008-06-18T14:06:57+00:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item rdf:about="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Firefox_3__day_3__first_impressions.html">
		<title>Firefox 3, day 3: first impressions</title>
		<link>http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Firefox_3__day_3__first_impressions.html</link>
		<description>
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/7_Reasons_Why_Firefox_3_Download_Day_Sucks.html&quot;&gt;Previously&lt;/a&gt;, I wrote:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Seriously: the browser looks like
a big improvement from Firefox 2, but
there are so many niggles with
this download day idea...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In reply to
&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.liblime.com/open-sesame/archives/93&quot;&gt;Open Sesame » Did you download Firefox 3?&lt;/a&gt;,
I answer &quot;Yes&quot;.
It was a major upgrade for me, requiring new versions
of Cairo and GTK+2, and installation of DBus-GLib
on my &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gobolinux.org/&quot;&gt;GoboLinux&lt;/a&gt;
computer, which brought in new versions of Xorg and so
required a recompile of my
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gnustep.org/&quot;&gt;GNUstep&lt;/a&gt;
desktop applications.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Once that was done, Firefox compiled unattended.
As noted by Adam Sampson in the
&lt;a href=&quot;http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/7_Reasons_Why_Firefox_3_Download_Day_Sucks.html#c&quot;&gt;comments on my last post,&lt;/a&gt;
even after building from source, you still get all the
obnoxious click-through EULA and when you type about:config
into the address bar, you get a &quot;no user-servicable parts&quot;
sort of notice, which really sucks.
I notice that MozCorp don&#39;t call it &quot;100% Open Source&quot;,
preferring instead
&lt;a href=&quot;http://en-us.www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/organic/&quot;&gt;Firefox: 100% Organic Software&lt;/a&gt;
(because we need another marketing campaign for free software,
right?),
so I expect I need to winkle out
the restrictively-licensed parts again -
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gnu.org/software/gnuzilla/&quot;&gt;GNUzilla&lt;/a&gt;,
there&#39;s still demand for your good work!
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;After day 3 with Firefox 3, what do I think of it?
Well, it seems a lot faster and a lot less RAM-hungry,
and I&#39;m quite impressed that all of the fancier bits of
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.koha.org/&quot;&gt;Koha&lt;/a&gt; and
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wordpress.org/&quot;&gt;Wordpress&lt;/a&gt;
seem to be working nicely
but while I&#39;m not annoyed enough to switch browsers yet (unlike
&lt;a href=&quot;http://wooga.drbacchus.com/ff3-and-safari&quot;&gt;FF3 and Safari - DrBacchus&#39; Journal&lt;/a&gt;),
there are still a hell of a lot of niggles and interface bugs.
Some of the problems may have been introduced in Firefox 2,
but I didn&#39;t actually use that enough to notice.
My day-to-day browsing for the last year or so has been on
a customised Firefox 1.5.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
The FF3 user interface has some big steps backwards from
FF1.5: in
particular, I&#39;ve lost the &quot;force pages that try to open new windows into the same window&quot; option
(or whatever it was called... I can&#39;t find the FF1.5 manual
online anymore);
some keyboard shortcuts have changed - for no good reason
that I can see (JavaScript has switched from Alt-E n Alt-S to
Alt-E n Alt-J, for example);
what on earth is the history drop down doing next to the
&quot;Go Forward&quot; arrow?;
and
the button to close a tab is on each tab, so I need to be
careful to miss it when trying to switch to a tab and
my pointer makes a pointless detour to the top-right when
I want to close a tab.
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#39;s not all bad on the interface.  The new RSS feed
and bookmark links in the location bar are much better
than in previous versions.  The bookmark tagging and
auto-generated folders could be a great idea once I&#39;ve
used it for a while.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#39;m pretty annoyed that Firefox 3 seems to come with
some spyware enabled as default.  I usually have cookies
either switched off or set to &quot;ask me every time&quot; so I
was surprised to be offered a cookie from
safebrowsing.google.com!
I know it&#39;s for a noble goal, but what&#39;s this doing
enabled without asking first?  Untick
the &quot;tell me if the site I&#39;m visiting is ...&quot; options in
Edit: Preferences: Security if you don&#39;t want details
of your browsing to be sent to the USA.
Another thing which really annoys me is that the
&lt;a href=&quot;http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/&quot;&gt;Firefox support site&lt;/a&gt;
requires javascript and seems unhappy with my cookie settings.
Not cool.
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Other than that, the main problems with Firefox 3
are omissions rather than bugs.  For example,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2006/12/11/microformats-part-0-introduction/&quot;&gt;Microformats [Alex Faaborg]&lt;/a&gt;
support was one of the long-trumpeted new features in Firefox 3,
but they&#39;re really not obviously included, as noted by others
in posts like
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ampedwebstandards.com/2008/06/13/firefox-3-is-here-wheres-the-microformats-support/&quot;&gt;Firefox 3 is here - where&#39;s the microformats?&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And finally,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://en-us.www.mozilla.com/en-US/search/?query=firefox&amp;amp;hits_per_page=10&amp;amp;hits_per_site=0&quot;&gt;searching mozilla.com for firefox&lt;/a&gt; returns 0 hits, which is a bit strange...
are they ashamed of it?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p><a href="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/7_Reasons_Why_Firefox_3_Download_Day_Sucks.html">Previously</a>, I wrote:</p>
<blockquote><p>Seriously: the browser looks like
a big improvement from Firefox 2, but
there are so many niggles with
this download day idea...</p></blockquote>

<p>In reply to
<a href="http://blogs.liblime.com/open-sesame/archives/93">Open Sesame » Did you download Firefox 3?</a>,
I answer "Yes".
It was a major upgrade for me, requiring new versions
of Cairo and GTK+2, and installation of DBus-GLib
on my <a href="http://www.gobolinux.org/">GoboLinux</a>
computer, which brought in new versions of Xorg and so
required a recompile of my
<a href="http://www.gnustep.org/">GNUstep</a>
desktop applications.
</p>
<p>Once that was done, Firefox compiled unattended.
As noted by Adam Sampson in the
<a href="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/7_Reasons_Why_Firefox_3_Download_Day_Sucks.html#c">comments on my last post,</a>
even after building from source, you still get all the
obnoxious click-through EULA and when you type about:config
into the address bar, you get a "no user-servicable parts"
sort of notice, which really sucks.
I notice that MozCorp don't call it "100% Open Source",
preferring instead
<a href="http://en-us.www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/organic/">Firefox: 100% Organic Software</a>
(because we need another marketing campaign for free software,
right?),
so I expect I need to winkle out
the restrictively-licensed parts again -
<a href="http://www.gnu.org/software/gnuzilla/">GNUzilla</a>,
there's still demand for your good work!
</p>

<p>After day 3 with Firefox 3, what do I think of it?
Well, it seems a lot faster and a lot less RAM-hungry,
and I'm quite impressed that all of the fancier bits of
<a href="http://www.koha.org/">Koha</a> and
<a href="http://www.wordpress.org/">Wordpress</a>
seem to be working nicely
but while I'm not annoyed enough to switch browsers yet (unlike
<a href="http://wooga.drbacchus.com/ff3-and-safari">FF3 and Safari - DrBacchus' Journal</a>),
there are still a hell of a lot of niggles and interface bugs.
Some of the problems may have been introduced in Firefox 2,
but I didn't actually use that enough to notice.
My day-to-day browsing for the last year or so has been on
a customised Firefox 1.5.
</p><p>
The FF3 user interface has some big steps backwards from
FF1.5: in
particular, I've lost the "force pages that try to open new windows into the same window" option
(or whatever it was called... I can't find the FF1.5 manual
online anymore);
some keyboard shortcuts have changed - for no good reason
that I can see (JavaScript has switched from Alt-E n Alt-S to
Alt-E n Alt-J, for example);
what on earth is the history drop down doing next to the
"Go Forward" arrow?;
and
the button to close a tab is on each tab, so I need to be
careful to miss it when trying to switch to a tab and
my pointer makes a pointless detour to the top-right when
I want to close a tab.
</p>

<p>It's not all bad on the interface.  The new RSS feed
and bookmark links in the location bar are much better
than in previous versions.  The bookmark tagging and
auto-generated folders could be a great idea once I've
used it for a while.</p>

<p>I'm pretty annoyed that Firefox 3 seems to come with
some spyware enabled as default.  I usually have cookies
either switched off or set to "ask me every time" so I
was surprised to be offered a cookie from
safebrowsing.google.com!
I know it's for a noble goal, but what's this doing
enabled without asking first?  Untick
the "tell me if the site I'm visiting is ..." options in
Edit: Preferences: Security if you don't want details
of your browsing to be sent to the USA.
Another thing which really annoys me is that the
<a href="http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/">Firefox support site</a>
requires javascript and seems unhappy with my cookie settings.
Not cool.
</p>

<p>Other than that, the main problems with Firefox 3
are omissions rather than bugs.  For example,
<a href="http://blog.mozilla.com/faaborg/2006/12/11/microformats-part-0-introduction/">Microformats [Alex Faaborg]</a>
support was one of the long-trumpeted new features in Firefox 3,
but they're really not obviously included, as noted by others
in posts like
<a href="http://www.ampedwebstandards.com/2008/06/13/firefox-3-is-here-wheres-the-microformats-support/">Firefox 3 is here - where's the microformats?</a>
</p>

<p>And finally,
<a href="http://en-us.www.mozilla.com/en-US/search/?query=firefox&amp;hits_per_page=10&amp;hits_per_site=0">searching mozilla.com for firefox</a> returns 0 hits, which is a bit strange...
are they ashamed of it?</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:date>2008-06-20T14:24:30+00:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item rdf:about="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Firefox_3__day_6__security_flaw_and_banks.html">
		<title>Firefox 3, day 6: security flaw and banks</title>
		<link>http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Firefox_3__day_6__security_flaw_and_banks.html</link>
		<description>
&lt;p&gt;
I didn&#39;t spot this when I wrote my last post,
but it seems there&#39;s a security alert for FF3
already - 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://hackademix.net/2008/06/19/firefox-3-untimely-security-advisory/&quot;&gt;hackademix.net: Firefox 3 Untimely Security Advisory&lt;/a&gt;
- but it also affects FF2 and probably my
cautious Javascript settings are enough to stop
it anyway, looking at that report.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
I&#39;ve also been sent another update to the page on
&lt;a href=&quot;http://mjr.towers.org.uk/blog/2007/banking#list&quot;&gt;Online Banking with GNU/Linux, Firefox-based browsers or Free Software&lt;/a&gt;
(first direct plus using ActiveX)
- I wonder if any bankers will be
noticeably slow to allow FF3 and will
any of them cite this security flaw?
I hope not - UK online banking security is
hardly in a good place to throw stones.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
I was mildly surprised that the list was linked from
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/bbcinternet/2008/06/linux_ubuntu_blog.html&quot;&gt;Ashley Highfield&#39;s BBC blog on Testing Linux Ubuntu&lt;/a&gt;
but I&#39;ve no idea why he doubts
the list&#39;s accuracy! It&#39;s as accurate as its
contributors - most of whom I name - and I&#39;m
willing to put my name to it too.
That&#39;s better than Wikipedia, which the BBC
uses far too much IMO.  Would he trust the list
more if it was anonymously-edited on a public
site?  Anyway, I guess I should
move that list to a more permanent location soon.
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Previous FF3 parts:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Firefox_3__day_3__first_impressions.html&quot;&gt;Firefox 3, day 3: first impressions&lt;/a&gt;
and &lt;a href=&quot;http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/7_Reasons_Why_Firefox_3_Download_Day_Sucks.html&quot;&gt;7 Reasons Why Firefox 3 Download Day Sucks&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p>
I didn't spot this when I wrote my last post,
but it seems there's a security alert for FF3
already - 
<a href="http://hackademix.net/2008/06/19/firefox-3-untimely-security-advisory/">hackademix.net: Firefox 3 Untimely Security Advisory</a>
- but it also affects FF2 and probably my
cautious Javascript settings are enough to stop
it anyway, looking at that report.
</p><p>
I've also been sent another update to the page on
<a href="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/blog/2007/banking#list">Online Banking with GNU/Linux, Firefox-based browsers or Free Software</a>
(first direct plus using ActiveX)
- I wonder if any bankers will be
noticeably slow to allow FF3 and will
any of them cite this security flaw?
I hope not - UK online banking security is
hardly in a good place to throw stones.
</p><p>
I was mildly surprised that the list was linked from
<a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/bbcinternet/2008/06/linux_ubuntu_blog.html">Ashley Highfield's BBC blog on Testing Linux Ubuntu</a>
but I've no idea why he doubts
the list's accuracy! It's as accurate as its
contributors - most of whom I name - and I'm
willing to put my name to it too.
That's better than Wikipedia, which the BBC
uses far too much IMO.  Would he trust the list
more if it was anonymously-edited on a public
site?  Anyway, I guess I should
move that list to a more permanent location soon.
</p>

<p>Previous FF3 parts:
<a href="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Firefox_3__day_3__first_impressions.html">Firefox 3, day 3: first impressions</a>
and <a href="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/7_Reasons_Why_Firefox_3_Download_Day_Sucks.html">7 Reasons Why Firefox 3 Download Day Sucks</a></p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:date>2008-06-23T11:23:01+00:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item rdf:about="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Firefox_3__day_10__security_flaw_2__more_banks__looking_for_a_new_browser.html">
		<title>Firefox 3, day 10: security flaw 2, more banks, looking for a new browser</title>
		<link>http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/Firefox_3__day_10__security_flaw_2__more_banks__looking_for_a_new_browser.html</link>
		<description>
&lt;p&gt;
Well, I was hoping to get Yet Another Blog Reorg
done before posting this, but it just hasn&#39;t
happened, so here are a few more thoughts on
Firefox 3 on this ol&#39; blog.
In fact, I&#39;ll probably finish the FF3 series here
before I switch over.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
I was in central London on Tuesday and suffered both
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.drake.org.uk/2008/06/more-london-fun.html&quot;&gt;the rudeness&lt;/a&gt;
and
&lt;a href=&quot;http://she.geek.nz/archives/502-london-so-far.html&quot;&gt;the black snot&lt;/a&gt;
(which no-one else I know seems to suffer)
so maybe that&#39;s why I&#39;ve been underachieving
this week.  I&#39;ve had London lethargy.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
I had a report about online banking that doesn&#39;t
work with FF3.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.npbs.co.uk/&quot;&gt;NPBS&lt;/a&gt;
will move into the hall of shame, sadly.
I&#39;m almost certain I warned them months ago that
their online banking was doing Javascript
stunts that aren&#39;t going to work forever.
I emailed them and haven&#39;t heard back since.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Back to the browser:
I share the contempt for the 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.madism.org/index.php/2008/06/26/177-firefox3-and-ssl&quot;&gt;Firefox 3 and SSL&lt;/a&gt;
problems
and I
&lt;a href=&quot;http://upsilon.cc/~zack/blog/posts/2008/06/firefox_3_un-ranting/&quot;&gt;like the new URL bar too.&lt;/a&gt;
However, I am finding the FF3 seems to use more
CPU (and so power) than FF1.5 and there seems to
be some frustrating delays in FF-clipboard
communications,
so I&#39;m looking at other browsers.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://conkeror.org/&quot;&gt;Conkeror&lt;/a&gt;
looks interesting.  Still Gecko (useful for work)
but stripped down.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
I spotted another post about microformats,
which I mentioned in my last post,
&lt;a href=&quot;http://ejohn.org/blog/bbc-removing-microformat-support/&quot;&gt;about the BBC dropping support for microformats [John Resig]&lt;/a&gt;
and I also noticed
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.intertwingly.net/blog/2008/06/24/Minimalist-Markup&quot;&gt;just how good SVG and Minimalist Markup looks in FF3 [Sam Ruby]&lt;/a&gt;
- I&#39;d love to try it, but my IE-using clients
probably wouldn&#39;t understand and I hate making
single-browser special editions.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p>
Well, I was hoping to get Yet Another Blog Reorg
done before posting this, but it just hasn't
happened, so here are a few more thoughts on
Firefox 3 on this ol' blog.
In fact, I'll probably finish the FF3 series here
before I switch over.
</p><p>
I was in central London on Tuesday and suffered both
<a href="http://www.drake.org.uk/2008/06/more-london-fun.html">the rudeness</a>
and
<a href="http://she.geek.nz/archives/502-london-so-far.html">the black snot</a>
(which no-one else I know seems to suffer)
so maybe that's why I've been underachieving
this week.  I've had London lethargy.
</p><p>
I had a report about online banking that doesn't
work with FF3.
<a href="http://www.npbs.co.uk/">NPBS</a>
will move into the hall of shame, sadly.
I'm almost certain I warned them months ago that
their online banking was doing Javascript
stunts that aren't going to work forever.
I emailed them and haven't heard back since.
</p><p>
Back to the browser:
I share the contempt for the 
<a href="http://blog.madism.org/index.php/2008/06/26/177-firefox3-and-ssl">Firefox 3 and SSL</a>
problems
and I
<a href="http://upsilon.cc/~zack/blog/posts/2008/06/firefox_3_un-ranting/">like the new URL bar too.</a>
However, I am finding the FF3 seems to use more
CPU (and so power) than FF1.5 and there seems to
be some frustrating delays in FF-clipboard
communications,
so I'm looking at other browsers.
<a href="http://conkeror.org/">Conkeror</a>
looks interesting.  Still Gecko (useful for work)
but stripped down.
</p><p>
I spotted another post about microformats,
which I mentioned in my last post,
<a href="http://ejohn.org/blog/bbc-removing-microformat-support/">about the BBC dropping support for microformats [John Resig]</a>
and I also noticed
<a href="http://www.intertwingly.net/blog/2008/06/24/Minimalist-Markup">just how good SVG and Minimalist Markup looks in FF3 [Sam Ruby]</a>
- I'd love to try it, but my IE-using clients
probably wouldn't understand and I hate making
single-browser special editions.
</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:date>2008-06-27T20:45:44+00:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item rdf:about="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/End_of_LugRadio_.html">
		<title>End of LugRadio!</title>
		<link>http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/End_of_LugRadio_.html</link>
		<description>
&lt;p&gt;
Just read on
&lt;a href=&quot;http://theangryangel.co.uk/index.php?/archives/262-Farewell-LUGRadio.html&quot;&gt;Farewell LUGRadio? [theangryangel]&lt;/a&gt;
and
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sungate.co.uk/?p=320&quot;&gt;Ashes to ashes, dust to dust... Lugradio is at an end [sungate]&lt;/a&gt;
that the most famous UK Free Software podcast
is ending at the end of this year.
I don&#39;t know the reasons yet, but it seems a
shame.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
I&#39;ve been listening again since they proved me
wrong and sorted out
the dumb licensing terms so it&#39;s clearly legal
to cut the shows up and only copy the bits that
interest me, and Season 5 seems more interesting
than previous ones.  Then again, I enjoyed
Red Dwarf VIII, so what do I know? (but VI and VII
did drag a lot)
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Maybe I will go to
&lt;a href=&quot;http://lugradio.org/live/UK2008/&quot;&gt;Lugradio Live 2008 in Wolverhampton on 19-20 July&lt;/a&gt;
now I know when it is! (Why
is the date only as a large slow graphic on the
event page? D&#39;oh! (Yeah I know I should have
emailed them, but I had
&lt;a href=&quot;http://mjr.towers.org.uk/blog/2007/#lr41645&quot;&gt;an unfun experience with the show&lt;a/&gt;,
so I&#39;d rather shout this in public.
Wow.  I guess I&#39;m still unhappy about them
regressing to school playground name-calling.))
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;
There are some suggested alternatives on
theangryangel, but most are more
Ubuntu-centric (which wasn&#39;t a good thing about LR),
non-Ogg and/or non-European,
so it looks like I&#39;ll give
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.linuxoutlaws.com/&quot;&gt;LinuxOutlaws&lt;/a&gt;
a try.  Any other recommendations?
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p>
Just read on
<a href="http://theangryangel.co.uk/index.php?/archives/262-Farewell-LUGRadio.html">Farewell LUGRadio? [theangryangel]</a>
and
<a href="http://www.sungate.co.uk/?p=320">Ashes to ashes, dust to dust... Lugradio is at an end [sungate]</a>
that the most famous UK Free Software podcast
is ending at the end of this year.
I don't know the reasons yet, but it seems a
shame.
</p><p>
I've been listening again since they proved me
wrong and sorted out
the dumb licensing terms so it's clearly legal
to cut the shows up and only copy the bits that
interest me, and Season 5 seems more interesting
than previous ones.  Then again, I enjoyed
Red Dwarf VIII, so what do I know? (but VI and VII
did drag a lot)
</p><p>
Maybe I will go to
<a href="http://lugradio.org/live/UK2008/">Lugradio Live 2008 in Wolverhampton on 19-20 July</a>
now I know when it is! (Why
is the date only as a large slow graphic on the
event page? D'oh! (Yeah I know I should have
emailed them, but I had
<a href="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/blog/2007/#lr41645">an unfun experience with the show<a/>,
so I'd rather shout this in public.
Wow.  I guess I'm still unhappy about them
regressing to school playground name-calling.))
</p><p>
There are some suggested alternatives on
theangryangel, but most are more
Ubuntu-centric (which wasn't a good thing about LR),
non-Ogg and/or non-European,
so it looks like I'll give
<a href="http://www.linuxoutlaws.com/">LinuxOutlaws</a>
a try.  Any other recommendations?
</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:date>2008-07-03T12:57:21+00:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
	<item rdf:about="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/End_of_this_blog_.html">
		<title>End of this blog!</title>
		<link>http://mjr.towers.org.uk/writing/reflections/End_of_this_blog_.html</link>
		<description>
&lt;p&gt;
This blog has moved on to
&lt;a href=&quot;http://mjr.towers.org.uk/blog/all.html&quot;&gt;software cooperative news&lt;/a&gt;
- please click through to continue reading.
&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
<p>
This blog has moved on to
<a href="http://mjr.towers.org.uk/blog/all.html">software cooperative news</a>
- please click through to continue reading.
</p>
 ]]></content:encoded>
                <dc:date>2008-07-14T11:02:09+00:00</dc:date>
	</item>
	
</rdf:RDF>
