- Met Calyx about Koha
- Bristol and Bath Perl Mongers
- Firefox 3, day 3: first impressions
Tue, 20 May 2008 12:22:23 +0100
It was nice to see them (first time I've met Bob) and have a bit of a chat about where we're each going with Koha. One interesting difference is that they have several private-sector clients, while I don't think my cooperative has yet done a private-sector Koha, but there seemed to be more similarities than differences, including adding more robust project management and ticketing as we deliver Koha 3 to people.
Tue, 27 May 2008 08:55:01 +0100
Despite their rules, I've already been well-flamed by one member, so it will be interesting to see what sort of group it becomes. Hopefully the flamers are nicer in real life.
[Firefox 3, day 3: first
Fri, 20 Jun 2008 14:24:30 +0100
Previously, I wrote:
Seriously: the browser looks like a big improvement from Firefox 2, but there are so many niggles with this download day idea...
In reply to Open Sesame » Did you download Firefox 3?, I answer "Yes". It was a major upgrade for me, requiring new versions of Cairo and GTK+2, and installation of DBus-GLib on my GoboLinux computer, which brought in new versions of Xorg and so required a recompile of my GNUstep desktop applications.
Once that was done, Firefox compiled unattended. As noted by Adam Sampson in the comments on my last post, even after building from source, you still get all the obnoxious click-through EULA and when you type about:config into the address bar, you get a "no user- servicable parts" sort of notice, which really sucks. I notice that MozCorp don't call it "100% Open Source", preferring instead Firefox: 100% Organic Software (because we need another marketing campaign for free software, right?), so I expect I need to winkle out the restrictively-licensed parts again - GNUzilla, there's still demand for your good work!
After day 3 with Firefox 3, what do I think of it? Well, it seems a lot faster and a lot less RAM-hungry, and I'm quite impressed that all of the fancier bits of Koha and Wordpress seem to be working nicely but while I'm not annoyed enough to switch browsers yet (unlike FF3 and Safari - DrBacchus' Journal), there are still a hell of a lot of niggles and interface bugs. Some of the problems may have been introduced in Firefox 2, but I didn't actually use that enough to notice. My day-to-day browsing for the last year or so has been on a customised Firefox 1.5.
It's not all bad on the interface. The new RSS feed and bookmark links in the location bar are much better than in previous versions. The bookmark tagging and auto-generated folders could be a great idea once I've used it for a while.
Other than that, the main problems with Firefox 3 are omissions rather than bugs. For example, Microformats [Alex Faaborg] support was one of the long-trumpeted new features in Firefox 3, but they're really not obviously included, as noted by others in posts like Firefox 3 is here - where's the microformats?
And finally, searching mozilla.com for firefox returns 0 hits, which is a bit strange... are they ashamed of it?
- banking (2)
- charities (3)
- cooperatives (19)
- cycling (5)
- debian (8)
- gobolinux (2)
- hardware (3)
- koha (3)
- life (31)
- links (1)
- phones (5)
- photos (1)
- satellite (3)
- software (28)
- spi (5)
- statistics (3)
- toll road (5)
- travel (6)
- web (26)
- wsm (12)
This is copyright 2008 MJ Ray. See fuller notice on front page.